Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:53:58.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of temperature on the activity and water use of farmed mink (Mustela vison)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C.P.B. Hansen  and
L.L. Jeppesen
C.P.B. Hansen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Behaviour, Zoological Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
L.L. Jeppesen*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Behaviour, Zoological Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
*
†E-mail:lljeppesen@zi.ku.dk
Get access

Abstract

Submerging in water is used by many species as a behavioral mechanism to reduce body temperature, and farmed mink have been shown to increase their swimming activity during summer months. Therefore we investigated whether a maintained, seasonally independent, high ambient temperature would lead to more swimming in farmed mink. Twelve mink were housed in a temperature controlled room and subjected to two periods of four different temperatures (8, 16, 24 and 32 °C) with each temperature lasting 4 days. Although some types of activities changed with changes in temperature, the total level of activity was not affected. At high temperatures, the mink did not show any increase in either swimming or stereotyped behavior. It is concluded that within the limits of the experiment, mink will not use submerging in water as a thermoregulatory mechanism.

Keywords

behaviourminkthermoregulationwater use
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , February 2003 , pp. 111 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bildsøe, M., Heller, K.E. and Jeppesen, L.L. 1990a. Stereotypies in adult ranch mink. Scientifur 14: 169–177.Google Scholar
Bildsøe, M., Heller, K.E. and Jeppesen, L.L. 1990b. Stereotypies in female ranch mink: seasonal and diurnal variation. Scientifur 14: 243–247.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 1998. Recommendations concerning farm animals. Report of The Standing Committee of The European Convention for The Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes (T-AP).Google Scholar
Dawson, T.J. and Fanning, F.D. 1981. Thermal and energetic problems of semiaquatic mammals: a study of the Australian water rat including comparisons with the platypus. Physiological Zoology 54: 285–296.Google Scholar
Doncaster, C.P., Dumonteil, E., Barré, H. and Jouventin, P. 1990. Temperature regulation of young coypus (Myocastor coypus) in air and water. American Journal of Physiology 6: R1220–R1227.Google Scholar
Dunstone, N. 1978. The fish-catching behaviour of the mink (Mustela vison): time-budgeting of hunting effort? Behaviour 67: 157–177.Google Scholar
Dunstone, N. 1993. The mink. T. and A. D.Poyser Ltd, London.Google Scholar
Dunstone, N. and Birks, J.D.S. 1987. The feeding ecology of mink (Mustela vison) in a coastal habitat. Journal of Zoology (London) 212: 69–83.Google Scholar
Estes, J.A. 1989. Adaptations for aquatic living by carnivores. In Carnivore behavior, ecology and evolution (ed. Gittleman, J.L.), pp. 242–244. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerell, R. 1967. Dispersal and acclimatisation of the mink (Mustela vison) in Sweden. Viltrevy 4: 1–38.Google Scholar
Hansen, C.P.B. and Jeppesen, L.L. 2001a. Swimming activity of farm mink (Mustela vison) and its relation to stereotypies. Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 50: 71–76.Google Scholar
Hansen, C.P.B. and Jeppesen, L.L. 2001b. Use of water for swimming and its relationship with temperature and other factors in farm mink (Mustela vison). Acta Agriculturæ Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 50: 89–93.Google Scholar
Hissink, H.H.A.L., Verstegen, M.V.A. and Jonge, G. de. 1996. The effect of ambient temperature on energy metabolism and activity in adult male mink (Mustela vison). Animal Production Review 29: 183–190.Google Scholar
Ireland, M.C. 1990. The behaviour and ecology of the American mink (Mustela vison Schreber) in a coastal habitat. Ph. D. thesis, Durham University, UK.Google Scholar
Korhonen, H.T. and Niemelä, P. 2002. Water absorption and the drying and cooling rates in mink (Mustela vison) following simulated diving. Animal Science 74: 277–283.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H., Balharry, E. and Taylor, P. T. 1994. Oxygen consumption of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in relation to water temperature. Physiological Zoology 67: 1174–1185.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. A. 1979. Seasonal patterns of body temperature and activity in free-ranging muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 57: 25–33.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.A. and Dyck, A.P. 1990. Aquatic thermoregulation of captive and free-ranging beavers (Castor canadensis). Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 2409–2416.Google Scholar
Mason, G., Clareborough, C. and Cooper, J. 1999. Drink or swim? Using substitutability and physiological responses to frustration to assess the importance of swimming-water for mink. Proceedings of the 33rd international congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 17-21 August 1999, Lillehammer, Norway, p. 83 (abstr. ).Google Scholar
Maurel, D., Coutant, C., Boissin-Agasse, L. and Boissin, J. 1986. Seasonal moulting patterns in three fur bearing mammals: the European badger (Meles meles L. ), the red fox (Vulpes vulpes L. ) and the mink (Mustela vison). A morphological and histological study. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64: 1757–1764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moller, S. 1991. Drinking behavior of mink in relation to watering system and water temperature. Nordic Agricultural Scientist (NJF) seminar 192, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Ödberg, F.O. 1978. Animal behaviors: stereotypies. Proceedings of the first world congress on ethology applied to zootechnics, Madrid, p. 475–480.Google Scholar
Seebacher, F., Grigg, G.C. and Beard, L.A. 1999. Crocodiles as dinosaurs: behavioral thermoregulation in very large ectotherms lead to high and stable body temperatures. Journal of Experimental Biology 202: 77–86.Google Scholar
Sherer, J. and Wunder, B.A. 1979. Thermoregulation of a semi-aquatic mammal, the muskrat, in air and water. Acta Theriologica 24: 249–256.Google Scholar
Simpson, M.J.A. and Simpson, A.E. 1977. One-zero and scan methods for sampling behaviour. Animal Behaviour 25: 726–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R.K. and Chowdhury, S. 1999. Effect of mine discharge on the pattern of riverine habitat use of elephants Elephas maximus and other mammals in Singhbhum forests, Bihar, India. Journal of Environmental Management 57: 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1994. SAS/STAT user’s guide, release 6·12 edition. SAS Institute, Cary NC.Google Scholar
Williams, T.M. 1986. Thermoregulation of the North American mink (Mustela vison) during rest and activity in the aquatic environment. Physiological Zoology 59: 293–305.Google Scholar