Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:46:20.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on herbage intake by Greyface ewes on perennial ryegrass white clover swards in the autumn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. G. Gunn
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF
J. M. Doney
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF
W. F. Smith
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF
A. D. M. Smith
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF
D. A. Sim
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF
E. A. Hunter
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural Statistics Service, James Clark Maxwell Building, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JZ
Get access

Abstract

The effects on herbage intake of changes of herbage mass associated with different stocking rates were studied in Greyface (Border Leicester × Scottish Blackface) ewes in the autumn. Intake was measured in 5-day periods in late September (PI), late October (P2) and late November (P3) on two established, perennial ryegrass/white clover swards (SI and S2). Both swards had previously been variably stocked to produce areas with a range in herbage masses, some of which were grazed continuously (G) at stocking rates declining from 18 to 6 ewes per ha.

Intake was also measured in P2 and P3 on other areas of the swards which were ungrazed for 6 weeks in September and October (C) and then stocked at 18 ewes per ha. Intakes of dry matter, organic matter and digestible organic matter were 16 g, 10 g and 7·5 g/kg live weight, respectively. Organic matter digestibility was 075 in PI and P2 but declined in P3.

Differences in herbage intake and digestibility arose largely because of differences between the swards in herbage mass, sward height and sward density. Ewes in condition scores > 3·00 in early September had lower intakes at all times than did thinner ewes. Changes in sward management associated with different strategies of use had little long-term effect on herbage intake. Keywords: digestibility, herbage, sheep, stocking rate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, G. W. and Birrell, H. A. 1977. Food intake and grazing behaviour of sheep varying in body condition. Animal Production 24: 343353.Google Scholar
Barthram, G. T. 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. Hill Farming Research Organisation, Report 1984–85, pp. 2930.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M., Agnew, R. D. M., Smith, W. F. and Sim, D. A. 1990. The effect of different pasture management strategies during the weaning-to-mating period on reproductive performance of Greyface ewes. Animal Production 51: 163171.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Smith, W. F., Senior, A. J., Barthram, E., Sim, D. A. and Hunter, E. A. 1991. Pre-mating herbage intake and the reproductive performance of North Country Cheviot ewes in different levels of body condition. Animal Production 52: 149156.Google Scholar