Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:31:40.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on relations between oral stereotypies in dairy cows and milk production, health and age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

I. Redbo
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kungsängens Research Station, S-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
K. G. Jacobsson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kungsängens Research Station, S-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
C. van Doorn
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Wageningen Agricultural University, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
G. Pettersson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kungsängens Research Station, S-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

The relationships of oral stereotypies to milk production and health were investigated in 95 dairy cows that had completed between one and five lactations. Forty cows in the herd performed stereotypies, mainly tongue-rolling and to a lesser extent bar-biting. A significant positive relation was found between the dependent variable milk production and stereotypies (P < 0·05) according to a GLM-model also containing lactation group (age; P < 0·01), sire (breeding value for milk yield; P < 0·01), and health I ailments (P > 0·05). There was no correlation between different phases in lactation and the frequency of stereotypies (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0·124; no. = 0·40; P > 0·05).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berglund, B. and Danell, B. 1987. Live weight changes, feed consumption, milk yield and energy balance in dairy cattle during the first period of lactation. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 37:495509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broom, D. M. 1983. Stereotypies as animal welfare indicators. In Indicators relevant to farm animal welfare (ed. Smidt, D.), pp. 8187. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G. M., Tartwijk, J. M. F. M. van, Hel, W. van der and Verstegen, M. W. A. 1986. The influence of degree of adaptation to tether-housing by sows in relation to behaviour and energy metabolism. Animal Production 42: 257268.Google Scholar
Redbo, I. 1990. Changes in duration and frequency of stereotypies and their adjoining behaviours in heifers, before, during and after the grazing period. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26:5767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics. Version 5 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Wiepkema, P. R. 1983. On the significance of ethological criteria for the assessment of animal welfare. In Indicators relevant to farm animal welfare (ed. Smidt, D.), pp. 7179. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar