Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T03:54:58.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the development of behaviour of intensively managed piglets in the humid tropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. D. Kabuga  and
S. Y. Annor
J. D. Kabuga
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
S. Y. Annor
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
Get access

Abstract

The behaviour development of intensively managed piglets, pre-weaning, in the hot humid tropics was studied with 18 litters of the Large White breed. The effect of age, sex and period of day (morning and afternoon) on the frequencies of some 14 behaviours from 1 day after birth until 34 days of age were examined using focal animal sampling on 36 piglets. Time spent lying and standing in contact declined. Time spent lying and standing alone, walking and the frequency of tail wagging, rubbing and scratching body parts, playing and fighting all significantly increased with age (P < 0·05). There was a significant (P < 0·05) linear trend, with age, in the eating of concentrates, which began at 2 weeks of age, and drinking water which occurred on the day after birth. Piglets were more active in the hot afternoons (12.00 to 16.00 h) than the cold mornings (08.00 to 12.00 h). There were no significant differences between males and females in any behavioural pattern (P < 0·05).

Keywords

behaviourhumid tropicspiglets
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 157 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buchenauer, D., Luft, C. and Grauvogl, A. 1982/1983. Investigations on the eliminative behaviour of piglets. Applied Animal Ethology 9:153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A. F. 1980. Farm animal behaviour. Bailliere Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1978. Observations on the behavioural development of suckling in early weaned piglets during the first six weeks after birth. Animal Behaviour 26: 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, H. B. 1984. Behavior and ecology of wild and feral swine (Sus scrofa). Journal of Animal Science 58:482–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. 1968. Adaptation of domestic animals. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, T. G. and Graves, H. B. 1976. Neonatal behavior and nutrition-related mortality in domestic swine. Journal of Animal Science 42: 235–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartsock, T. G., Graves, H. B. and Baumgardt, B. R. 1977. Agonistic behavior and the nursing order in suckling piglets: relationships with survival, growth and body composition. Journal of Animal Science 44: 320–330.Google Scholar
Hurnik, J. F. 1985. A review of periparturient behavior in swine. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65: 777–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P. and Bateson, P. 1986. Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Newberry, R. C. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1988. Development of some behaviour patterns in piglets under semi-natural conditions. Animal Production 46:103–109.Google Scholar
Randall, G. C. B. 1972. Observations on parturition in the sow. I. Factors associated with the delivery of the piglets and their subsequent behaviour. Veterinary Record 90: 178–182.Google Scholar
Signoret, J. P., Baldwin, B. A., Fraser, D. and Hafez, E. S. E. 1975. The behaviour of swine. In The behaviour of domestic animals. 3rd ed. (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.), pp. 295–329. Bailliére Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Whatson, T. S. and Bertram, J. M. 1982/1983. Some observations on mother-infant interaction in the pig (Sus scrofa). Applied Animal Ethology 9:253–261.Google Scholar