Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-9rk55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-20T19:50:40.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the influence of ‘boar effect’ component stimuli on puberty attainment in the gilt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. N. Kirkwood  and
P. E. Hughes
R. N. Kirkwood
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
P. E. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT
Get access

Abstract

Forty Large White × (Landrace × Large White) gilts were allocated by litter to one of four treatments, such that one gilt from each of 10 litters was on each treatment. The treatments were: (i) 30-min daily boar exposure; (ii) 30-min daily pen change; (iii) 30-min daily pen change, plus exposure to boar urinary pheromone; and (iv) a control, subject to no stimulation.

The treatments commenced at a gilt age of 165 days and continued either until puberty was detected or a cutoff age of 250 days was reached. Analysis revealed no significant differences between any groups for age at puberty or ovulation rate (determined at slaughter following the second oestrus).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , October 1980 , pp. 209 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bourn, Phyllis, Kinsey, R., Carlson, R. and Zimmerman, D. R. 1975. Puberty in gilts as influenced by boar exposure and ‘transport phenomenon’. J. Anim. Sci. 41: 344 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1969. The effect of boar presence on the age at puberty of gilts. Rep. Sch. Agric. Univ. Nott., pp. 74–77.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1970. The effect of the presence of a boar on the attainment of puberty in gilts. J. Reprod. Pert. 23: 435–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, P. H., Pattinson, M. A. and Cole, D. J. A. 1969. Reproduction in the gilt. Rep. Sch. Agric. Univ. Nott., pp. 65–67.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N. and Hughes, P. E. 1979. The influence of age at first boar contact on puberty attainment in the gilt. Anim. Prod. 29: 231–238.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N. and Hughes, P. E. 1980. A note on the efficacy of continuous v. limited boar exposure on puberty attainment in the gilt. Anim. Prod. 31: 205–207.Google Scholar
Melrose, D. R., Reed, H. C. B. and Patterson, R. L. S. 1971. Androgen steroids associated with boar odour as an aid to the detection of oestrus in pig artificial insemination. Br. vet. J. 127: 497–502.Google Scholar
Signoret, J. P. 1970. Reproductive behaviour of pigs. J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl. 11, pp. 105–117.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. and Bossert, W. H. 1963. Chemical communication among animals. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 19: 673–710.Google Scholar