Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T15:09:10.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Piglet use of the creep area and piglet mortality – effects of closing the piglets inside the creep area during sow feeding time in pens for individually loose-housed sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. Berg ,
I. L. Andersen ,
G. M. Tajet ,
I. A. Haukvik ,
S. Kongsrud  and
K. E. Bøe
S. Berg*
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432Ås, Norway
I. L. Andersen
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432Ås, Norway
G. M. Tajet
Affiliation:
Norsvin, PO Box 504, N-2304, Hamar, Norway
I. A. Haukvik
Affiliation:
Norwegian Pig Health Service, Gilde Fellesslakterier BA, Norway
S. Kongsrud
Affiliation:
Norsvin, PO Box 504, N-2304, Hamar, Norway
K. E. Bøe
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, PO Box 5003, N-1432Ås, Norway
*
†E-mail: synne.berg@umb.no
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of closing the piglets inside the piglet creep area during the first two or four sow feedings on piglet mortality from birth until weaning and piglet use of the creep area within the first 3 days after farrowing. A total of 96 sows in individual loose-housing farrowing pens were randomly allotted to one out of three groups: C0 – control (piglets not closed inside the creep area during feeding), C2 – piglets closed inside the creep area during the first two sow feedings after farrowing, C4 – piglets closed inside the creep area during the first four sow feedings after farrowing. Production results were registered on all sows, and the behaviour of 33 of the sows and litters were recorded, using instantaneous sampling every 10 min for 6 h during day 1, 2 and 3 after farrowing (farrowing=day 0). There were no effects of closing the piglets inside the creep area during sow feeding on piglet mortality, piglet activity or location. However, to make this conclusion reliable, this should be tested for several herds and with different types of creep areas. The piglets were lying increasingly more in the creep area from day 1 to day 3 (P<0·001), and at the same time mean proportion of the litter observed lying in close proximity of the mother decreased (P<0·001). How much the piglets used the creep area differed strongly between sows (P<0·05).

Keywords

animal husbandrycreep feedingmortalitypigletssows

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , April 2006 , pp. 277 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andersen, I. L., Berg, S. and Bøe, K. E. 2005. Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa)–purely accidental or a poor mother? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J. L., Hems worth, P. H., Cronin, G. M., Jongman, E. C. and Hutson, G. D. 2001. A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, J. and Bourne, R. A. 1987. The effect of farrowing house temperature on piglet behaviour and creep use. Animal Production 44: 478 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Close, W. H. 1992. Thermoregulation in piglets: environmental and metabolic consequences. In Neonatal survival and growth (ed. Varley, M. A.Williams, P. E. V.Lawrence, T. L. J.), British Society of Animal Production, occasional publication no. 15. pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
Christison, G. I., Wenger, I. I. and Follensbee, M. E. 1997. Teat seeking success of newborn piglets after drying or warming. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77: 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G. M., Lefebure, B. and McClintock, S. 2000. A comparison of piglet production and survival in the Werribee Farrowing Pen and conventional farrowing crates at a commercial farm. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, G. M. and Smith, J. A. 1992. Effects of accomodation type and straw bedding around parturition and during lactation on the behaviour of primiparous sows and survival and growth of piglets to weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, G. W. and Swierstra, E. E. 1987. Causes of piglet death from birth to weaning. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 67: 543–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, P. R. and Morrison, V. 1984. Causes and prevention of piglet mortality. Pig News and Information 5: 369–376.Google Scholar
Hatcher, L. and Stepanski, E. J. 1994. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® system for univariate and multivariate statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Holyake, P. K., Dial, G. D., Trigg, T. and King, V. L. 1995. Reducing pig mortality through supervision during the perinatal period. Journal of Animal Science 73: 3543–3551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrupka, B. J., Leibbrandt, V. D., Crenshaw, T. P. and Benevenga, N. J. 1998. The effect of farrowing crate heat lamp location on sow and pig patterns of lying and pig survival. Journal of Animal Science 76: 2995–3002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, P. B. 1983. Heat seeking behaviour of newborn pigs as affected by house temperature and level of lighting. Animal Production 36: 531 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Marchant, J. N., Broom, D. M. and Corning, S. 2001. The influence of sow behaviour on piglet mortality due to crushing in an open farrowing system. Animal Science 72: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchant, J. N., Rudd, A. R., Mendl, M. T., Broom, D. M., Meredith, M. J., Corning, S. and Simmins, P. H. 2000. Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Veterinary Record 147: 209–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mount, L. E. 1963. Environmental temperatures preferred by the young pig. Nature 199: 1212–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norsvin. 2002. Annual report 2002. Norwegian Pig Breeding Association.Google Scholar
Pitts, A. D., Weary, D. M., Fraser, D., Pajor, E. A. and Kramer, D. L. 2002. Alternative housing for sows and litters Part 5. Individual differences in the maternal behaviour of sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 76: 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H. 1992. Abferkelbuchten: ein neues Konzept. Entwicklung und Anwendung. FAT-Berichte 417: 1–8.Google Scholar
Stangel, G. and Jensen, P. 1991. Behaviour of semi-naturally kept sows and piglets (except suckling) during 10 days postpartum. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1989. The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Animal Production 48: 419–425.Google Scholar
Straw, B. E., Dewey, C. E. and Bürgi, E. J. 1998. Patterns of crossfostering and piglet mortality on commercial U.S. and Canadian swine farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 33: 83–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajet, G. M., Haukvik, I. A. and Kongsrud, S. 2003. Effect of managemental factors on piglet mortality with focus on herds with loose-housed sows. Proceedings of the 54th annual meeting of the EAAP, Rome, 31 August to 3 September (abstr.).Google Scholar
Thodberg, K., Jensen, K. H. and Herskin, M. S. 2002. Nursing behaviour, postpartum activity and reactivity in sows: effects of farrowing environment, previous experience and temperament. Applied. Animal Behaviour Science 77: 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, R. and Schick, M. 1996. Neue abferkelbuchten ohne fixation der muttersau. Wenig höhere investitionen, praxisüblicher arbeitszeitbedarf. FAT-Berichte 481: 1–4.Google Scholar
Wechsler, B. and Hegglin, D. 1997. Individual differences in the behaviour of sows at the nest-site and the crushing of piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, A. R. 1986. Pathways for newborn piglets from sow to creep area. Farm Building Progress 85: 27–28.Google Scholar
White, K. R., Anderson, D. M. and Bate, L. A. 1996. Increasing piglet survival through an improved farrowing management protocol. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 76: 491–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. and Xin, H. 2001. Responses of piglets to creep heat type and location in farrowing crate. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 17: 515–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziron, M. and Hoy, S. 2003. Effect of a warm and flexible piglet nest heating system–the warm waterbed–on piglet behaviour, live weight management and skin lesions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80: 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar