Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:33:03.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The production parameters influencing the composition and structure of pastoral cattle herds in a semi-arid area of Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. Roderick ,
P. Stevenson  and
J. Ndungu
S. Roderick
Affiliation:
Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics Research Unit, Department of Agriculture, Earley Gate, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6 AT
P. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS
J. Ndungu
Affiliation:
Kenya Trypanosomiasis Research Institute, Box 362, Kikuyu, Kenya
Get access

Abstract

The size and composition of three herds belonging to Maasai pastoralists were monitored for more than 5 years (1990 to 1996). Animals were categorized as either suckling calves, weaned heifers, weaned males or breeding females. The dates of entries and exits were used to estimate the total number of observed animal days for each category. Fertility rates of breeding females and mortality and disposal rates for each category were estimated using animal days as the denominator. Herd differences were tested using contingency tables. Age to first calving and calving intervals were estimated and examined using analysis of variance tests.

The patterns of births and deaths were seasonally influenced. The mean annual calving rate of all breeding females was 65·6% and for females excluding first calvers was 46·9%. No herd effects were observed. The mean observed interval between calvings was 609 days and the calving interval, calculated from the parturition rate, was 649 days with no herd differences. Mean age at first calving was approximately 4 years with no herd differences. Mean annual mortality rates were 8·9% for breeding cows, 7·8% for weaned males, 6·7% for weaned heifers and 22·1% for calves. The mean annual culling rate of cows was 10·8% and the sale rate of heifers and weaned males was 12·9% and 41·5% respectively. The mean age at disposal of heifers was 655 days and of steers was 801 days. Herd sizes were shown to fluctuate annually with no obvious trend between herds. The main determinants of production identified were the effect of seasonally poor nutrition on the rate of reproduction and the effect of season, herd mobility and disease on mortality.

The study describes production levels that can be used to predict future changes to the system. The results are discussed in terms of the factors influencing and their relevance to pastoral development. The findings are compared with those observed in other, similar areas.

Keywords

cattleKenyapastoralismproductionsemi-arid zones
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 66 , Issue 3 , June 1998 , pp. 585 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coppock, D. L. 1993. The Borana plateau of southern Ethiopia: synthesis of pastoral research, development and change, 1980–91. Executive Summary, ILCA Systems Study, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Dahl, G. and Hjort, A. 1976. Having herds: pastoral herd growth and household economy. Department of Social Anthropology 2. University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
International Livestock Centre for Africa. 1991. Maasai herding: an analysis of the livestock production system of Maasai pastoralists in eastern Kajiado district, Kenya (ed. Bekure, S., Leeuw, P. N. de, Grandin, B. E., Neate, P. J. H.). ILCA, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
James, A. D. J. 1990. LPEC: the livestock production efficiency calculator user guide. Pan Livestock Services, Department of Agriculture, Reading University.Google Scholar
Kerven, C. 1992. Customary commerce: a historical reassessment of pastoral livestock marketing in Africa. Occasional paper no. 15, Overseas Development Institute, London.Google Scholar
King, J. M., Sayers, A. R., Peacock, C. P. and Kontrohr, E. 1984. Maasai herd and flock structures in relation to livestock wealth, climate and development. Agricultural Systems 13: 21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kituyi, M. 1990. Becoming Kenyans: socio-economic transformation of the pastoral Maasai. ACTS Press, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Konandreas, P. A. and Anderson, F. M. 1982. Cattle herd dynamics: an integer and stochastic model for evaluating production alternatives. ILCA research report no. 2. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Mukasa-Mugerwa, E. 1989. A review of reproductive performance of female Bos indicus (zebu) cattle. ILCA monograph no. 6. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Oxby, C. 1982. Group ranches in Africa. World Animal Review, April–June, 1982, pp. 11–18.Google Scholar
Putt, S. N. H., Shaw, A. P. M., Woods, A. J., Tyler, L. and James, A. D. 1988. Veterinary epidemiology and economics in Africa: a manual for use in the design and appraisal of livestock health policy. ILCA manual no. 3. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Roderick, S. 1995. Pastoral cattle productivity in a tsetse infested area of south west Kenya. Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Semenye, P. P. 1987. Factors influencing Maasai cattle productivity and nutrition in Kajiado district, Kenya. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
Spencer, P. 1973. Nomads in alliance: symbiosis and growth among the Rendile and Samburu of Kenya. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
Upton, M. 1993. Livestock productivity assessment and modelling. Agricultural Systems 43: 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J. M. and Meadows, S. J. 1981. Evaluation of the contribution of group and individual ranches in Kajiado district, Kenya, to economic development and pastoral production strategies. Report to the Overseas Development Administration, London. Development, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar