Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-n5rmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T14:18:53.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies in sow reproduction 1. The effect of nutrition between weaning and remating on the reproductive performance of primiparous sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. H. Brooks  and
D. J. A. Cole
P. H. Brooks
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics
D. J. A. Cole
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leics
Get access

Summary

Following weaning of their first litter at 42 days post partum, 36 Landrace × (Landrace × Large White) sows were fasted for 24 hr then allocated to one of three feed levels, 1·8, 2·7 and 3·6 kg food/day, until the day after mating. During pregnancy all the sows received 1·8 kg food/day.

The incidence of infertility and anoestrus was greatest for sows fed 1·8 kg/day and least for sows fed 3·6 kg·day. Sows fed 1·8 kg/day took significantly (P < 0·01) longer (21·6 + 3·0 days) to return to oestrus than sows fed 3·6 kg/day (9·2 ± 2·2 days). The mean litter size for sows fed 1·8, 2·7 and 3·6 kg food/day was 9·4 ± 0·9, 10·1 ± 0·8 and 11·5 ± 0·6 piglets respectively, but these differences were not significant.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , December 1972 , pp. 259 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, L. L. and Melampy, R. M. 1972. Factors affecting ovulation rate in the pig. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 329–366. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. 1970. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1971a. Effect of nutrition on reproductive performance in the pig. In Proceedings 5th Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers (ed. Swan, H. and Lewis, D.) pp. 21–40. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1971b. The effect of increasing feed intake for one day only during the oestrus period on the reproductive performance of sows. Anim. Prod. 13: 669–675.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cole, D. J. A. 1972. The effect on litter size of increased feed intake during the oestrus period in the sow. Anim. Prod. 14: 241–245.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. H. and Cooper, K. J. 1972. Short term nutrition and litter size. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 385–398. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Cooper, K. J., Brooks, P. H., Cole, D. J. A. and Haynes, N. B. 1972. The effect of feed level during the oestrous cycle on ovulation, embryo survival and anterior pituitary luteinising hormone potency in the gilt. (In press.)Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. and MacPherson, R. M. 1972. Protein and amino acid requirements in pregnancy and lactation. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 417–434. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Lodge, G. A. 1972. Quantitative aspects of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation. In Pig Production (ed. Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 399–416. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
MacLean, C. W. 1969. Observations on non-infectious infertility in sows. Vet. Rec. 85: 675–682.Google Scholar
Mulinos, M. G. and Pomerantz, L. 1940. Pseudo-hypophysectomy—a condition resembling hypophysectomy produced by malnutrition. J. Nutr. 19: 493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, H. 1968. Some results of Danish research into the nutrition of pregnant and lactating sows. In Technical and Economic Aspects of Pig Feeding. Int. Conv. Reggio. Emilia, Italy, 1967.Google Scholar
Rinaldini, L. M. 1949. Effect of chronic inanition on the gonadotrophic content of the pituitary gland. J. Endocr. 6: 54–62.Google Scholar