Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:23:37.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reducing post-mixing aggression and skin lesions in weaned pigs by application of a synthetic maternal pheromone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

JH Guy ,
SE Burns ,
JM Barker  and
SA Edwards
JH Guy*
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
SE Burns
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
JM Barker
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
SA Edwards
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture Food and Rural Development, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: j.h.guy@ncl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In commercial pig production, piglets are often mixed after weaning which can result in severe aggression and lead to body damage, disruption of feeding behaviour and reduced growth. This experiment investigated whether application of a synthetic maternal pheromone to groups of weaned pigs in commercial housing would affect the level of aggression and skin lesions sustained after mixing. Two treatments (Pheromone and Control) were used with 16 replicate pens of pigs (20 pigs per pen). Treatments were applied on the day of weaning (average 28 days of age) on a per room basis in alternate weeks. In Pheromone pens, after routine washing and disinfection, the walls and feeders were treated one hour prior to occupation with a synthetic pheromone at a rate of 1.0 ml pig−1. Control pens were as for Pheromone except no product was applied. During the 24-h period, post mixing, pigs in pheromone-treated pens spent significantly less time fighting than those in control pens. This was reflected in reduced injury scores 24 h after mixing, with pigs in pheromone-treated pens having 39% fewer skin lesions on the front of the body compared to those in control pens. Treatment had no effect on growth rate or feed efficiency, although the feed intake for days 7–28 was significantly lower and feed efficiency tended to be lower in pheromone-treated pens. In conclusion, application of a synthetic maternal pheromone can be considered one of the arsenal of strategies to reduce aggression and safeguard the welfare of groups of weaned pigs where mixing is unavoidable.

Keywords

aggressionanimal welfarebehaviourpheromonepigweaning
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , August 2009 , pp. 249 - 255
Copyright
© 2009 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Andersen, IL, Andenæs, H, B⊘e, KE, Jensen, P and Bakken, M 2000 The effects of weight asymmetry and resource distribution on aggression in groups of unacquainted pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 68: 107–120Google ScholarPubMed
Azpiroz, A, Garmendia, L, Fano, E and Sanchez-Martin, JR 2003 Relations between aggressive behaviour, immune activity and disease susceptibility. Aggression and Violent Behaviour 8: 433–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breuer, K, Sutcliffe, MEM, Mercer, JT, Rance, KA, Beattie, VE, Sneddon, IA and Edwards, SA 2003 The effect of breed on the development of adverse social behaviours in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84: 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colson, V, Orgeur, P, Courboulay, V, Dantec, S, Foury, A and Mormede, P 2006 Grouping piglets by sex at weaning reduces aggressive behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 97: 152–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Eath, RB 2005 Socialising piglets before weaning improves social hierarchy formation when pigs are mixed post-weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, TM, Newberry, RC, Spinka, M and Cloutier, S 2002 Effects of early play experience on play behaviour of piglets after weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79: 221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudink, S, Simonse, H, Marks, I, de Jonge, FH and Spruijt, BM 2006 Announcing the arrival of enrichment increases play behaviour and reduces weaning stress-induced behaviour of piglets directly after weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 86–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EU 2001 Commission Directive 2001/93/EC of 9 November 2001 Amending Directive 91/630/EEC Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Pigs. European Commission: Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D, Milligan, B, Pajor, EA, Phillips, PA, Taylor, AA and Weary, DM 1998 Behavioural perspectives on weaning in domestic pigs. In: Wiseman, J, Varley, MA and Chadwick, JP (eds) Progress in Pig Science pp 121–140. Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Friend, TH, Knabe, DA and Tanksley, TD 1983 Behaviour and performance of pigs grouped by three different methods of weaning. Journal of Animal Science 57: 1046–1411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grandin, T and Bruning, J 1992 Boar presence reduces fighting in mixed slaughter-weight pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 273–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiraudie-Capraz, G, Slomianny, M-C, Pageat, P, Malosse, C, Cain, A-H, Orgeur, P and Nagnan-Le Meillour, P 2005 Biochemical and chemical supports for a transnatal olfactory continuity through sow maternal fluids. Chemical Senses 30: 241–251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchant-Forde, JN and Marchant-Forde, RM 2005 Minimising inter-pig aggression during mixing. Pig News and Information 26: 63–71Google Scholar
McGlone, JJ 1985 A quantitative ethogram of aggressive and submissive behaviours in recently regrouped pigs. Journal of Animal Science 61: 559–565CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, JJ and Anderson, DL 2002 Synthetic maternal pheromone stimulates feeding behaviour and weight gain in weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80: 3179–3183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, JJ and Curtis, SE 1985 Behaviour and performance of weanling pigs in pens equipped with hides. Journal of Animal Science 60: 20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, JJ and Morrow, JL 1988 Reduction of pig agonistic behaviour by androstenone. Journal of Animal Science 66: 880–884CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogunbameru, BO, Kornegay, ET and Wood, CM 1992 Effect of evening or morning weaning and immediate or delayed feeding on post weaning performance of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 70: 337–342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pageat, P and Teissier, Y 1998 Usefulness of a porcine pheromone analogue in the reduction of aggression between weaners on penning; behavioural study. Proceedings of 15th International Pig Veterinary Society pp 413. 5-9 July, 1998, Birmingham, UKGoogle Scholar
Pageat, P 2001 Pig Appeasing Pheromones to Decrease Stress, Anxiety and Aggressiveness. US Patent Number 6,169,113. http://www.patents.com/Pig-appeasing-pheromones-decrease-stress-anxiety-aggressiveness/U169113/en-US/Google Scholar
Pajor, EA, Fraser, D and Kramer, DL 1991 Consumption of solid food by suckling pigs: individual variation and relation to weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parratt, CA, Chapman, KJ, Turner, C, Jones, PH, Mendl, MT and Miller, BG 2006 The fighting behaviour of piglets mixed before and after weaning in the presence and absence of a sow. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, SP, Farnworth, NJ, White, IMS, Brotherstone, S, Mendl, M, Knap, P, Penny, P and Lawrence, AB 2006 The accumulation of skin lesions and their use as a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96: 245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waran, NK and Broom, DM 1993 The influence of a barrier on the behaviour and growth of early-weaned piglets. Animal Production 56: 115–119Google Scholar
Wattanakul, W, Stewart, AH, Edwards, SA and English, PR 1997 A study of the effects of grouping piglets and changing sow location on behaviour and performance of suckling piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar