Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:08:12.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annual intake trends of a large urban animal rehabilitation centre in South Africa: a case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

K Wimberger  and
CT Downs
K Wimberger
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P/Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa; email: Downs@ukzn.ac.za or kirstenwimberger@yahoo.com
CT Downs
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, P/Bag X01, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa; email: Downs@ukzn.ac.za or kirstenwimberger@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Each year, worldwide, large numbers of wild animals are taken to rehabilitation centres for treatment, care and release. Although analysis of intake records may provide valuable insight into the threats and impacts to wildlife, there are few such published reports. Four years of intake records from a large urban rehabilitation centre in South Africa were examined for trends. Animal intake rate was high (2,701 [± 94] per annum). Most of the intake (90%) was birds, with few mammals (8%) and reptiles (2%), and most of these were of locally common species (eg doves, pigeons). This reflects the findings of other studies, namely that species living in close association with humans are the most frequently admitted to rehabilitation centres. In total, most of the animals admitted (43%) were juveniles, which were assumed to be abandoned or orphaned. The implications of then rehabilitating these juveniles, which were largely uninjured, are three-fold: should humans be interfering with nature if the cause was not human-related, can each juvenile (especially in these large numbers) be adequately prepared to survive and thrive when released into the wild, and is there space in the environment for them, without causing harm to others already in the environment. This study suggests that the large numbers of animals currently being admitted to the centre may be reduced, possibly through increased public education; in particular to leave uninjured juveniles in the wild. Furthermore, improvements in the centre's recording system may allow for use in funding requests and various research opportunities.

Keywords

animal welfareintake recordsrehabilitationSouth Africatrendsurban
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , November 2010 , pp. 501 - 513
Copyright
© 2010 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Aitken, G 2004 A New Approach to Conservation: The Importance of the Individual through Wildlife Rehabilitation. Ashton Publishing: England, UKGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G and Marais, J 2007 A Guide to the Reptiles of Southern Africa. Struik Publishers: Cape Town, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Alt, GL and Beecham, JJ 1984 Reintroduction of orphaned black bear cubs into the wild. Wildlife Society Bulletin 12: 169–174Google Scholar
Anon 2008 Wildlife Rehabilitation in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources: Madison, USA. http://dnr.wi.gov/org/land/wildlife/whealth/rehab/RehabGuide.pdf (Accessed April 2008)Google Scholar
Anon 2009 BWRC-Wildlife Casualty Recording Scheme. British Wildlife Rehabilitation Council: UK. http://wildlife1.widllifeinformation.org/S/00Ref/miscellaneouscontents/BWRC-CasualtyRecordingScheme/Titlepage.htm (Accessed January 2009)Google Scholar
Azikuru, JA and Angubo, R 2007 Management of free-ranging birds rescued and admitted to Uganda Wildlife Education Centre: 2000-2004. African Journal of Ecology 46(3): 418–420Google Scholar
Barham, PJ, Crawford, RJM, Underhill, LG, Wolfhaardt, AC, Barham, BJ, Dyer, BM, Leshoro, TM, Meyer, MA, Navarro, RA, Oschadleus, D, Upfold, L, Whittington, PA and Williams, AJ 2006 Return to Robben Island of African Penguins that were rehabilitated, relocated or reared in captivity following the Treasure oil spill of 2000. Ostrich 77: 202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J and Westcott, S 2001 Distribution, demographics and survivorship of grey seal pups (Halichoerus grypus) rehabilitated in southwest England. Mammalia 65(3): 349–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J 1992 A glut of gibbons in Sarawak-is rehabilitation the answer? Oryx 26: 157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beringer, J, Mabry, P, Meyer, T, Wallendorf, M and Eddleman, WR 2004 Post-release survival of rehabilitated white-tailed deer fawns in Missouri. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 732–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boycott, RC and Bourquin, O 2000 The South African Tortoise Book-A Guide to South African Tortoises, Terrapins and Turtles, Second Edition. Bourquin: Hilton, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Caldecott, J and Kavanagh, M 1983 Can translocation help wild primates? Oryx 17: 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, HR 2003 Oil and California's seabirds: an overview. Marine Ornithology 31: 1–7Google Scholar
Clark, JE, Pelton, MR, Wear, BJ and Ratajczak, DR 2002 Survival of orphaned black bears released in the smoky mountains. Ursus 13: 269–273Google Scholar
Csermely, D 2000 Behaviour of hand-reared orphaned long-eared owls and tawny owls after release in the wild. Italian Journal of Zoology 67: 57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, O and Jenkins, A 2002 A delicate balance… raptor rehabilitation. Africa Birds and Birding Oct/Nov: 47–49Google Scholar
Deem, SL, Terrell, SP and Forrester, DJ 1998 A retrospective study of morbidity and mortality of raptors in Florida: 1988-1994. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 29(2): 160–164Google ScholarPubMed
Drake, A and Fraser, D 2008 Admission trends and mortality correlates for mallard ducklings at wildlife rehabilitation facilities. Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation 29(1): 4-14Google Scholar
Dubois, S 2003 A Survey of Wildlife Rehabilitation Goals, Impediments, Issues, and Success in British Columbia, Canada. MSc Thesis, University of British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Dubois, S and Fraser, D 2003 Defining and measuring success in wildlife rehabilitation. Wildlife Rehabilitation 20: 117–126Google Scholar
Du Toit, J 1999 A helping hand. Africa Birds and Birding 4(3): 60–63Google Scholar
Fajardo, I, Babiloni, G and Miranda, Y 2000 Rehabilitated and wild barn owls (Tyto alba): dispersal, life expectancy and mortality in Spain. Biological Conservation 94: 287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, AS and Barrows, SZ 1990 Raptors rehabilitated in Iowa during 1986 and 1987: a retrospective study. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 26(1): 18-21Google Scholar
Guyot, G and Clobert, J 1997 Conservation measures for a population of Hermann's tortoise Testudo hermanni in southern France bisected by a major highway. Biological Conservation 79: 251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harden, J, Dickerman, RW and Elliston, EP 2006 Collection, value, and use of wildlife rehabilitation data. Journal of Wildlife Rehabilitation 28(1): 10–28Google Scholar
Hartup, BK 1996 Rehabilitation of native reptiles and amphibians in DuPage County, Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 32: 109–112Google ScholarPubMed
Henzi, SP 1979 The vervet crisis. African Wildlife 33: 8–10Google Scholar
Hockey, PAR, Dean, WRJ and Ryan, PJ 2005 Roberts-Birds of Southern Africa, Seventh Edition. The Trustees of the John Voelcker Bird Book Fund: Cape Town, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, SK 1998 Healers of the Wild. Coyote Moon Press: Denver, USAGoogle Scholar
Kellert, SR 1991 Canadian perceptions of marine mammal conservation and management in the Northwest Atlantic. International Marine Mammal Association Inc Technical report no. 91-04. Guelph: Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A and Bland, M 2006 Admissions, diagnoses, and outcomes for Eurasian sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) brought to a wildlife rehabilitation centre in England. Journal of Raptor Research 40(3): 231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, A, Goodwin, S, Grogan, A and Mathews, F 2008 Postrelease survival of hand-reared pipistrelle bats (Pipistrellus spp). Animal Welfare 17: 375–382Google Scholar
Kelly, TR and Sleeman, JM 2003 Morbidity and mortality of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) admitted to the wildlife center of Virginia, 1993-2001. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 39(2): 467–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, JK 1992 Wild animal welfare. In: Ryder, RD (ed) Animal Welfare and the Environment pp 139–154. Gerald Duckworth: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, JK and Best, R 1998 Treatment and rehabilitation of wildlife casualties: legal and ethical aspects. In Practice 20: 214–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, K, Chilvers, D, Charles, A and Kelly, A 2008 Postrelease survival of hand-reared tawny owls (Strix aluco) based on radio-tracking and leg-band return data. Animal Welfare 17: 207–214Google Scholar
Macdonald, IAW, Richardson, DM and Powrie, FJ 1986 Range expansion of the hadeda ibis Bostrychia hagedash in southern Africa. South African Journal of Zoology 21: 331–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marais, J 2004 A Complete Guide to the Snakes of Southern Africa. Struik Publishers: Cape Town, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Measures, LN 2004 Marine mammals and ‘wildlife rehabilitation’ programs. Research document 2004/122. Fisheries and Oceans Canada: CanadaGoogle Scholar
Molony, SE, Baker, PJ, Garland, L, Cuthill, IC and Harris, S 2007 Factors that can be used to predict release rates for wildlife casualties. Animal Welfare 16: 361–367Google Scholar
MWAC (Minnesota Wildlife Assistance Cooperative) 2009 What is Wildlife Rehabilitation? http://www.tc.umn.edu/-devo0028/w_is_re.htm (Accessed January 2009)Google Scholar
Neese, MR, Seitz, J, Nuzzo, J and Horn, DJ 2008 Population trends of raptors admitted to the Illinois Raptor Center, 1995-2006. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 101: 217–224Google Scholar
Newman, K 2002 Newman's Birds of Southern Africa. Struik Publishers: Cape Town, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Newton, I 2003 The Speciation and Biogeography of Birds. Academic Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Parsons, NJ and Underhill, LG 2005 Oiled and injured African penguins Spheniscus demersus and other seabirds admitted for rehabilitation in the Western Cape, South Africa, 2001 and 2002. African Journal of Marine Science 27(1): 289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, NJ and Huijser, MP 1999 Mortality factors affecting wild hedgehogs: a study of records from wildlife rescue centers. Lutra 42: 6–24Google Scholar
Rowan, MK 1983 The Doves, Parrots, Louries and Cuckoos of Southern Africa. David Philip: Cape Town, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Skinner, JD and Chimimba, CT 2005 The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion, Third Edition. Cambridge University Press: Cape Town, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Sleeman, JM 2007 Keeping wildlife wild: how to prevent habituation and imprinting in rehabilitated wildlife. In: Proceedings of the North American Veterinary Conference pp 1708–1709. 8-12 January 2007, Florida, USA. Eastern States Veterinary Association Inc: Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
Spencer, KA, Harris, S, Baker, PJ and Cuthill, IC 2007 Song development in birds: the role of early experience and its potential effect on rehabilitation success. Animal Welfare 16: 1–13Google Scholar
Trendler, K 1995a Common causes of wildlife casualties. In: Penzhorn, BL (ed) Proceedings of the SASOL Symposium on Wildlife Rehabilitation pp 50–54. South African Veterinary Association Wildlife Group: Onderstepoort, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Trendler, K 1995b Minimum operating guidelines for rehabilitation centers. In: Penzhorn, BL (ed) Proceedings of the SASOL Symposium on Wildlife Rehabilitation pp 1–4. South African Veterinary Association Wildlife Group: Onderstepoort, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Visagie, R 2008 The rehabilitation of raptors in the eastern Nama Karoo during a two-year period. Gabar 19(2): 66–67Google Scholar
von Klemperer, M 2008 Leave it to the experts. The Witness, 3 July 2008. Media 24: Pietermaritzburg, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
Wimberger, K 2009 Wildlife rehabilitation in South Africa. PhD Thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South AfricaGoogle Scholar