Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:03:28.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism as influences in the quality of life of companion animals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

JWS Bradshaw  and
RA Casey
JWS Bradshaw*
Affiliation:
Anthrozoology Institute, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford BS40 5DU, UK
RA Casey
Affiliation:
Anthrozoology Institute, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford BS40 5DU, UK
*
* Correspondence: j.w.s.bradshaw@bristol.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since animal minds are private, so their perception of their own quality of life (QoL) must be also. Anthropocentrism, the interpretation of reality exclusively in terms of human values and experience, has to be guarded against in any assessment of animal welfare; for domestic pets, misapprehensions about their olfactory and cognitive abilities appear to present the greatest challenge to their welfare. Anthropomorphism, the attribution of human qualities to animals, presents a particular problem when considering companion animals, since most bonds between owners and their pets appear to be based upon a perception of the pet as almost human. Many owners report that their dogs, cats and horses are capable of feeling complex emotions, such as pride and guilt, that require a level of self-awareness that has been difficult to demonstrate even in chimpanzees. Such beliefs appear to contribute to the development of behavioural disorders in pets; for example, clinical experience suggests that the application of punishment by owners who attribute ‘guilt’ to their animals may unwittingly lead to compromised welfare. Anthropomorphic owners are also likely to be poor proxies for reporting their pets' QoL.

Keywords

animal welfareanthropocentrismanthropomorphismcatdogemotion
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue S1: Quality of Life: the heart of the matter: Proceedings of the UFAW/BVA Ethics Committee International Symposium, The Royal Society, London, 13-14 September 2006. , May 2007 , pp. 149 - 154
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Archer, J 2001 Why do people love their pets? Evolution and Human Behaviour 18: 237–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asa, CS, Peterson, EK, Mech, LD and Seal, US 1985 The deposition of anal sac secretions by captive wolves, Canis lupus. Journal of Mammalogy 66: 89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahlig-Pieren, Z and Turner, DC 1999 Anthropomorphic interpretations and ethological descriptions of dog and cat behaviour by lay people. Anthrozoös 12: 205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, CJ and Hurst, JL 1996 Welfare by design: the natural selection of welfare criteria. Animal Welfare 5: 405–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekoff, M 1994 Cognitive ethology and the treatment of non-human animals: how matters of mind inform matters of welfare. Animal Welfare 3: 75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonas, S, McNicholas, J and Collis, GM 2000 Pets in the network of family relationships: an empirical study. In: Podberscek, AL, Paul, E and Serpell, JA (eds) Companion Animals and Us pp 209–236. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Bowen, J and Heath, S 2005 Behaviour Problems in Small Animals: Practical Advice for the Veterinary Team. Elsevier Saunders: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, JWS 1992 Behavioural biology. In: Thorne, C (ed) The Waltham Book of Cat and Dog Behaviour pp 31–52. Pergamon Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, JWS and Lea, AM 1992 Dyadic interactions between domestic dogs. Anthrozoös 5: 245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, JWS, Natynczuk, SE and Macdonald, DW 1990 Potential for applications of anal sac volatiles from domestic dogs. In: Macdonald, DW, Müller-Schwarze, D and Natynczuk, SE (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 5 pp 640–644. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Brisbin, I, Lehr, JR and Austad, SN 1991 Testing the individual odour theory of canine olfaction. Animal Behaviour 42: 63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C, Jones, F and Braithwaite, V 2005 In situ examination of boldness–shyness traits in the tropical poeciliid, Brachyraphis episcopi. Animal Behaviour 70: 1003–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuthill, IC, Partridge, JC, Bennett, ATD, Church, SC, Hart, NS and Hunt, S 2000 Ultraviolet vision in birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior 29: 159–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F 2005 Suspicious minds. New Scientist 186(2502): 48Google Scholar
Diamond, J 1997 Guns, Germs and Steel: A Short History of Everybody for the Last 13,000 Years. Jonathan Cape: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fidler, M, Light, P and Costall, A 1996 Describing dog behaviour psychologically: pet owners versus non-owners. Anthrozoös 9: 196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, ML and Trowbridge, BJ 1989 The role of odor in the social lives of carnivores. In: Gittleman, JL (ed) Carnivore Behavior, Ecology and Evolution pp 57–88. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, SD and John, OP 1999 Personality dimensions in non-human animals: a cross-species review. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8: 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hare, B and Tomasello, M 2005 Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 439–444CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepper, PG and Wells, DL 2005 How many footsteps do dogs need to determine the direction of an odour trail? Chemical Senses 30: 291–298CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewson, CJ, Hiby, EF and Bradshaw, JWS 2007 Assessing quality of life in companion and kennelled dogs: a critical review. Animal Welfare 16(S): 89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, AM 1995 Empathy and belief in the mental experience of animals. Anthrozoös 8: 132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubrecht, R, Sales, G, Peyvandi, A, Milligan, S and Shield, B 1997 Noise in dog kennels, effects of design and husbandry. In: Van Zutphen LFM and Balls M (eds) Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics Series: Developments in Animal and Veterinary Sciences pp 215–221. Elsevier: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, JE 2000 Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23: 155–184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGregor, PK and Peake, TM 2000 Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour. Acta Ethologica 2: 71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millot, JL, Filiatre, JC, Eckerli, A, Gagno, AC and Montagner, H 1987 Olfactory cues in the relations between children and their pet dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 19: 189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, SD 2005 Anthropomorphism and cross-species modeling. In: Daston, L and Mitmann, G (eds) Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism pp 100–117. Columbia University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Mithen, S 1996 The Prehistory of the Mind: A Search for the Origins of Art, Religion and Science. Thames & Hudson: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Morris, PH, Doe, C and Godsell, E 2007 Secondary emotions in non-primate species? Behavioural reports and subjective claims by animal owners. Cognition & Emotion 21: in pressGoogle Scholar
Panksepp, J 2003 At the interface of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive neurosciences: decoding the emotional feelings of the brain. Brain and Cognition 52: 4–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panksepp, J 2005 Affective consciousness: core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and Cognition 14: 30–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinelli, DJ 2000 Folk Physics for Apes. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Prescott, MJ, Morton, DB, Anderson, D, Buckwell, A, Heath, S, Hubrecht, R, Jennings, M, Robb, D, Ruane, B, Swallow, J and Thompson, P 2004 Refining dog husbandry and care. Laboratory Animals 38 (Suppl 1): S1-S94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I 2005 Housing and welfare. In: Rochlitz, I (ed) The Welfare of Cats pp 177–203. Springer: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooney, NJ and Bradshaw, JWS 2006 Social cognition in the domestic dog: behaviour of spectators towards participants in interspecific games. Animal Behaviour 72: 343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sales, G, Hubrecht, R, Peyvandi, A, Milligan, S and Shield, B 1997 Noise in dog kennelling: is barking a welfare problem for dogs? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serpell, JA 2005 People in disguise: anthropomorphism and the human–pet relationship. In: Daston, L and Mitmann, G (eds) Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism pp 121–136. Columbia University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Snow, AI, Cook, KF, Lin, P-S, Morgan, RO and Magaziner, J 2005 Proxies and other external raters: methodological considerations. Health Sciences Review 40: 1676–1693Google Scholar
Sommerville, BA and Broom, DM 1998 Olfactory awareness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 57: 269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, C 1995 Feeding behaviour of domestic dogs and the role of experience. In: Serpell, J (ed) The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour, and Interactions with People pp 103–114. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Von Uexküll, JJ 1926 Theoretical Biology. Harcourt, Brace & Company: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F 2001 The inside and outside aspects of consciousness: complementary approaches to the study of animal emotion. Animal Welfare 10 (Suppl): S129-S139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F and Farish, M 2004 Qualitative categories for the interpretation of sheep welfare: a review. Animal Welfare 13: 261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojciechowska, JI and Hewson, CJ 2005 Quality-of-life assessment in pet dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 226: 722–728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynne, CDL 2004 The perils of anthropomorphism. Nature 428: 606CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed