Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:47:03.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Balance Device for the Analysis of Behavioural Patterns of the Mouse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

F Schlingmann ,
H A Van de Weerd ,
V Baumans ,
R Remie  and
LFM Van Zutphen
F Schlingmann*
Affiliation:
Solvay Duphar, Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Weesp, The Netherlands
H A Van de Weerd
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands
V Baumans
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands
R Remie
Affiliation:
Solvay Duphar, Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Weesp, The Netherlands
LFM Van Zutphen
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A device for analysing mouse behaviour which is based on recording the movements of the animal in a balance test cage has been developed. The amplitude patterns provoked by the movements of the animal correlate with behavioural patterns. The system not only allows differentiation between five behavioural categories: resting, grooming, eating, locomotion and climbing - but also indicates the location of the animal in its cage. Upon validation, the system has proven to be a reliable and time-saving device for the non-invasive recording of behavioural patterns in the mouse.

Keywords

animal welfarebalance devicebehavioural analysisbehavioural patternscircadian rhythmmice
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1998 , pp. 177 - 188
Copyright
© 1998 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Badiani, A, Mundi, W J and Cabilio, S 1995 A computerized system for the continuous recording and analysis of feeding, drinking, diuresis and locomotor activity. Physiology & Behavior 57: 973–981CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barclay, R J, Herbert, W J and Poole, T B 1988 The disturbance index. A behavioural method of assessing the severity of common laboratory procedures on rodents. UFAW Animal Welfare Research Report No 2. Universities Federation of Animal Welfare: Potters Bar, UKGoogle Scholar
Blom, H J M 1993 Evaluation of housing conditions for laboratory mice and rats. The use of preference tests for studying choice behaviour. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Blom, H J M, Van Vorstenbosch, C J A H V, Baumans, V, Hoogervorst, M J C, Beynen, A C and Van Zutphen, LFM 1992 Description and validation of a preference test system to evaluate housing conditions for laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büttner, D 1991 Climbing on the cage lid, a regular component of locomotor activity in the mouse. Journal of Experimental Animal Science 34: 165–169Google Scholar
Clement, J G, Mills, P and Brockway, B 1989 Use of telemetry to record body temperature and activity in mice. Journal of Pharmacological Methods 21: 129–140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawley, J N, Szara, S, Pryor, G T, Creveling, C R and Bernard, B K 1982 Development and evaluation of a computer-automated color TV tracking system for automatic recording of social and exploratory behavior of small animals. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 5: 235–247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heckl-Ensslin, C and Van Butler, I 1988 Locomotor activity of a behaviour mutant in NMRI mice. In: Beynen, A C and Solleveld, H A (eds) New Developments in Biosciences: Their Implications for Laboratory Animal Science. Proceedings of the third FELASA symposium pp 373–374. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers: DordrechtGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, T, Takeyuki, ABE and Tashiro, K 1987 An actograph for small laboratory animals controlled by a personal computer. Experimental Animals 36: 453–457CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthew, J, Kluger, C A, Conn, B F, Freter, R and Abrams, G D 1990 Effect of gastrointestinal flora on body temperature of rats and mice. Regulatory Integrative Comparative Physiology 27: 552–557Google Scholar
Minematsu, S, Hiruta, M, Taki, M, Fujii, Y and Aburada, M 1991 Automatic monitoring system for the measurement of body weight, food and water consumption and spontaneous activity of a mouse. The Journal of Toxicological Sciences 16: 61–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlingmann, F, De Rijk, S H L M, Pereboom, W and Remie, R 1993 Avoidance as a behavioural parameter in the determination of distress amongst albino and pigmented rats at various light intensities. Animal Technology 44: 2–8Google Scholar
Spruijt, B M and Gispen, W H 1984 Behavioral sequences as an easily quantifiable parameter in experimental studies. Physiology & Behavior 32: 707–710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, P, Dole, A H and Gentry, R T 1983 An improved technique for monitoring the drinking behaviour of mice. Physiology & Behavior 30: 971–974Google Scholar
Van de Weerd, H A, Baumans, V, Koolhaas, J M and Van Zutphen, LFM 1994 Strain specific behavioural response to environmental enrichment in the mouse. Journal of Experimental Animal Science 36: 117–127Google Scholar