Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:19:02.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Behavioural Repertoire of Non-Breeding Group-Housed Female Laboratory Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S D E Held ,
R J Turner  and
R J Wootton
S D E Held*
Affiliation:
Centre for Behavioural Biology, Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
R J Turner
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3DA, UK
R J Wootton
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3DA, UK
*
*Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: suzanne.held@bristol.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many studies on group-housing of laboratory rabbits to date have focused on management aspects and economic implications. Our aim here is to provide behavioural background information for future investigations focusing on behavioural and welfare aspects of group-housing. In the present study, we established the behavioural repertoire of female laboratory rabbits kept in single-sex groups in enriched floor-pens. Thirty-six adult does of common laboratory breeds were kept in groups of four in enriched floor-pens. Behavioural observations were carried out over a period of 30 months with a total observation time of 21 h per group and 4.2 h per focal animal. Observations took place at natural dusk and dawn and lasted for 120 or 180 min per group. Most of the behavioural elements in the repertoire of mixed-sex wild and domestic rabbits were also observed here in single-sex groups of laboratory does. However, in the absence of males, sexual behaviours were directed towards other females and no maternal behaviours, other than nest building at the end of pseudopregnancies, were exhibited. Attention is drawn to differences between the behavioural repertoire reported here and that of singly caged laboratory rabbits.

Keywords

animal welfarebehavioural repertoiregroup-housinglaboratory rabbits
Type
Short Communication
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , November 2001 , pp. 437 - 443
Copyright
© 2001 UfAW, The Old School, Brewhouse Hill, Wheathampstead, Herts ALA 8AN, UK

References

Albonetti, E M, Dessí-Fulgheri, F and Farabollini, F 1990 Intrafemale agonistic interactions in the domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Aggressive Behavior 16: 77–863.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G R 1991 Group-housing on floor-pens and environmental enrichment for sandy lop rabbits. Animal Technolology 42: 109–120Google Scholar
Beyer, C and McDonald, P 1973 Hormonal control of sexual behaviour in the female rabbit. Advances in Reproduction and Physiology 6: 185–219Google ScholarPubMed
Bigler, L and Oester, H 1994 Paarhaltung nichtproduzierender Hauskaninchen-Zibben im Käfig. Berliner Münchner Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 107: 202-205 [Title translation: Keeping of non-reproducing female rabbits caged in pairs]Google Scholar
Brummer, H 1975 Trichophagie — eine Verhaltensstörung bei Kaninchen. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 82: 350–351 [Title translation: Trichophagy - a behavioural abnormality in rabbits]Google Scholar
Drescher, Β and Loeffler, Κ 1991 Einfluss unterschiedlicher Haltungsverfahren und Bewegungsmöglichkeiten auf die Kompakta der Röhrenknochen von Fleisch- und Versuchskaninchen. Tierärztliche Umschau 46: 736–741 [Title translation: Effects of different housing systems on the structure of long bones in Chinchilla and New-Zealand White rabbits]Google Scholar
Gunn, D and Morton, D B 1995 Inventory of the behaviour of New Zealand White rabbits in laboratory cages. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 45: 277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, E 1972 Sexual and related territorial behaviour in the laboratory rabbit. Laboratory Animal Science 22: 684–691Google ScholarPubMed
Heath, M and Stott, E 1990 Housing rabbits the unconventional way. Animal Technology 41: 13–25Google Scholar
Held, S D E, Turner, R J and Wootton, R J 1995 Choices of laboratory rabbits for individual or group-housing. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, S D E, Wootton, R J and Turner, R J 1994 Effect of enrichment on the behaviour of group-housed New Zealand White and Dutch Cross Californian laboratory rabbits. In: Bunyan, J (ed) Welfare and Science. Proceedings of the 5th FELASA Symposium pp 358–360. Laboratory Animals Limited, Royal Society of Medicine Press: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kraft, R 1979 Comparative ethology of domestic and wild rabbits (I). Zeitschrift fur Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie 95: 140–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, M 1989 The behaviour of young rabbits in different environmental conditions. PhD Thesis, University of Berne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, M and Wieser, R 1985 Indikatoren für mangelnde Tiergerechtheit sowie Verhaltensstörungen bei Hauskaninchen. In: Zeeb, K (ed) Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemässen Tierhaltung KTBL-Schrift 311 pp 96107. KTBL: Darmstadt, Germany [Title translation: Indicators of poor welfare and behavioural abnormalities in domestic rabbits]Google Scholar
Loeffler, K, Drescher, B and Schulze, G 1991 Einfluss unterschiedlicher Haltungsverfahren und Bewegungsmöglichkeiten auf das Verhalten von Versuchs- und Fleischkaninchen. Tierärztliche Umschau 46: 471–478 [Title translation: Effects of different housing systems on behaviour in Chinchillabastard experimental and New-Zealand White rabbits]Google Scholar
Love, J A 1994 Group housing meeting the physical and social needs of the laboratory rabbit. Laboratory Animals 44: 5–11Google ScholarPubMed
Love, J A and Hammond, K 1991 Group housing rabbits. Laboratory Animals 20: 37–43Google Scholar
McFarland, D 1987 The Oxford Companion to Animal Behaviour. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Morton, D B, Jennings, M, Batchelor, G R, Bell, D, Birke, L, Davies, K, Eveleigh, J R, Gunn, D, Heath, M, Howard, B, Koder, P, Phillips, J, Poole, T, Sainsbury, A W, Sales, G D, Smith, D J A, Stauffacher, M and Turner, R J 1993 Refinements in rabbit husbandry. Second Report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. Laboratory Animals 27: 301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podberscek, A L, Blackshaw, J K and Beattie, A W 1990 The behaviour of group-penned and individually caged laboratory rabbits. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28: 353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothfritz, P, Drescher, B and Loeffler, K 1992 Einfluss unterschiedlicher Haltungsverfahren und Bewegungsmöglichkeiten auf die Spongiosastruktur der Rippen sowie Brust- und Lendenwirbel von Versuchs- und Fleischkaninchen. Tierärztliche Umschau 47: 758–768 [Title translation: Effects of different housing systems and opportunités for movement on the spongia tissues of the ribs, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of laboratory and meat rabbits]Google Scholar
Scharmann, W 1989 Verbesserung der Versuchstierhaltung — ein Beitrag zum Tierschutz. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 8/89: 367–373 [Title translation: Improvements in laboratory animal husbandry — a contribution to animal welfare]Google Scholar
Stauffacher, M 1988 Entwicklung und Ethologische Prüfung der Tiergerechtheit einer Bodenhaltung für Hauskaninchen-Zuchtgruppen. PhD Thesis, University of Berne, Switzerland [Title translation: Development and ethological animal welfare assessment of a floor-pen group-housing system for female breeding rabbits]Google Scholar
Stauffacher, M, Bell, D J and Schulz, K D 1994 Rabbits. In: O’Donoghue, P N (ed) The Accommodation of Laboratory Animals in Accordance with Animal Welfare Requirements pp 15–30. Bundesministerium für Ernährung Landwirtschaft und Forsten: Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Turner, R J, Held, S D E, Hirst, J E, Billinghurst, G and Wootton, R J 1997 An immunological assessment of group-housed rabbits. Laboratory Animals 31: 362–272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed