Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:28:50.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chinese farmers’ attitude towards the improvement of animal welfare in their facilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

S Platto ,
Q Zhu ,
A Guo ,
Q He ,
S Hu ,
A Valros  and
A Irwin
S Platto*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Technology, School of Life Sciences, Jianghan University, Wuhan, China
Q Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Data Sciences and Data Technology, College of Informatics, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
A Guo
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
Q He
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
S Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
A Valros
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland
A Irwin
Affiliation:
Department of Foreign Language, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China
*
* Contact for correspondence: splatto@mail.hzau.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study sought to investigate Chinese farmers’ attitude towards animal welfare by using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). According to the TPB, an individual's intention to behave in a certain way is determined by his/her attitude towards the behaviour (specific attitude — importance — and general attitudes), the perceived behavioural control (easiness), and the supposed opinion of the people who are important to him/her (subjective norms). A total of 253 questionnaires were used, which included the three main animal productions in China (swine, poultry and cattle). Chinese farmers have perceived the improvement of animal welfare as two abstracts: general attitudes (reward-seeking, and empathic farmer); and four specific categories of actions (favourable environment, animal health, humane treatment of animals and farmers’ well-being). Our analysis revealed that general and specific attitudes were the strongest predictors of farmers’ intentions to improve animal welfare in the questionnaire study. In fact, Chinese farmers considered it fairly important to improve the animal welfare measures considered in the survey. In contrast, the same animal welfare measures were considered difficult to improve by the farmers as indicated by the lack of association between the easiness of improving animal welfare and the intentions. In addition, veterinarians, agricultural advisers, and scientific experts were considered to be relatively influential subjective norms as regards the activities of the farmers. This is the first study to provide an insight into the underlying meanings and values of Chinese farmers’ views on improvements to animal welfare.

Keywords

animal welfareattitudescattleChinese farmerspoultryTheory of Planned Behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 99 - 112
Copyright
© 2020 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ajzen, I 1971 Attitudinal vs normative messages: An investigation of the differential effects of persuasive communications on behav-iour. Sociometry 34(2): 263–280. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I 2002 Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32: 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I and Fishbein, M 1980 Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Albaum, G and Peterson, RA 1984 Empirical research in inter-national marketing. Journal of International Business Studies 15(1): 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, E, Deary, I, Edwards-Jones, G and Arey, D 2005 Attitudes to farm animal welfare. Factor structure and personali-ty correlates in farmers and agriculture students. Journal for Individual Differences 26: 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.26.3.107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, JL, Hemsworth, PH, Hennessy, DP, McMallum, TH and Newman, EA 1994 The effects of modifying the amount of human contact on behavioural, physiological and production responses of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90054-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, BB and van Huik, MM 2007 Animal welfare: the attitudes and behaviour of European pig farmers. British Food Journal 11:931–944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700710835732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøe, KE, Berg, S and Andersen, IL 2006 Resting behaviour and displacements in ewes: effects of reduced lying space and pen shape. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 98(3-4): 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, AG 2003 The livestock revolution: a pathway from poverty? Proceedings of the ATSE Crawford Conference. 13 August 2003, Parliament House, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Bruckmeier, K and Prutzer, M 2007 Swedish pig producers and their perspectives on animal welfare: a case study. British Food Journal 109: 906–918. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700710835714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, L 2018 Vietnam spends millions on animal welfare to secure more Australian beef. http://www.abc.net.au/news/rural/2018-03013/viet-nam-invests-millions-in-abattoir-cattle-welfare/945502Google Scholar
Chan, RY and Lau, L 1998 A test of the Fishbein-Ajzen behav-ioural intentions model under Chinese cultural settings: are there any differences between PRC and Hong Kong consumers? Journal of Marketing Practice: Applied Marketing Science 4(3): 85–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiou, SJ 1998 The effects of attitude, subjective norm, and per-ceived behavioural control on consumers’ purchase intentions: The moderating effects of product knowledge and attention to social comparison information. Proceedings of Natural Science Council 9(2): 298–308Google Scholar
Coleman, GJ, McGregor, M, Hemsworth, PH, Boyce, J and Dowling, S 2003 The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82: 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00057-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, G, Chen, Z and Lau, A 2009 Peace in a thatched hut, that is happiness: Subjective well-being among peasants in rural China. Journal of Happiness Studies 10(2): 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-007-9078-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, C 2003 Rising consumption of meat and milk in devel-oping countries has created a new food revolution. Journal of Nutrition 133(11): 3907S–3910S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/133.11.3907SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devendra, C 2007 Perspective on animal production systems in Asia. Livestock Science 106: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livs-ci.2006.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasina, FO, Ali, AM, Yilma, JM, Thieme, O and Ankers, P 2012 The cost-benefit of biosecurity measures on infectious dis-eases in the Egyptian household poultry. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 103(2-3): 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pre-vetmed.2011.09.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organisation 2005 Responding to the livestock revolution: the case for livestock public policies. Livestock Policy Brief 01. FAO: Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organisation 2016 FAOSTAT. http://faostat.fao.orgGoogle Scholar
Francesco, AM and Chen, ZX 2004 Its moderating effects on the relationship between organisational commitment and employ-ee performance in China. Group & Organization Management 29(4): 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601103257423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fregonesi, JA and Leaver, JD 2002 Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behaviour, performance and health of dairy cows housed in straw-yard and cubicle systems. Livestock Production Science 78(3): 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00097-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Q, Zhu, Y, Kong, Y and Sun, J 2012 Spatial analysis and dis-tricting of the livestock and poultry breeding in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences 22(6): 1079–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-012-0984-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garforth, CJ, Bailey, AP and Tranter, RB 2013 Farmers’ atti-tudes to disease risk management in England: a comparative analy-sis of sheep and pig farmers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 110(34): 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.02.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, M 2015 The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food. Economic Research Ekonomska Istraživanja 28(1): 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2015.1083875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, D, Sneddon, IA and Beattie, VE 2009 The relationship between the stockperson's personality and attitudes and the pro-ductivity of dairy cows. Animal 3: 737–743. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109003991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansson, H and Lagerkvist, CJ 2014 Defining and measuring farmers’ attitudes to farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare 23: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.1.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsworth, PH 2003 Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81: 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00280-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G 1980 Culture Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA, USAGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G 2011 Dimensionalising cultures: The Hofstede Model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, C, Bourlakis, M and Garrod, G 2006 Farmers’ perceptions of animal welfare across the UK farm assurance schemes. The rural citizen: Governance, culture and wellbeing in the 21st century. University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UKGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Y, Chao, S, Liu, J, Yang, Y, Chen, Y, Zhang, A and Cao, H 2016 Source apportionment and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil for a township in Jiangsu Province, China. Chemosphere 168: 1658–1668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemos-phere.2016.11.088CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kauppinen, T, Vainio, A, Valros, A, Rita, H and Vesala, KM 2010 Improving animal welfare: qualitative and quantitative method-ology in the study of farmers’ attitudes. Animal Welfare 19: 523–536Google Scholar
Kauppinen, T, Vesala, MK and Valros, A 2012 Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters. Livestock Science 143(2-3): 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kielland, C, Ruud, LE, Zanella, AJ and Osteras, O 2009 Prevalence and risk factors for skin lesions on legs of dairy cattle housed in free stalls in Norway. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 5487–5496. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, KAH, Whay, R, Maggs, CM, Barker, ZE, Paul, ES, Bell, AK and Main, DCJ 2010 Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 2. Understanding dairy farmers’ motivations. Research in Veterinary Science 89(2): 318–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.02.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C and Green, RT 1991 Cross-Cultural examination of the Fishbein behavioral intention model. Journal of International Business Studies 22(2): 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1057 palgrave.jibs.8490304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lensink, BJ, Veissier, I and Florand, L 2001 The farmers’ influ-ence on calves’ behaviour, health and production of a veal unit. Animal Science 72: 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, PJ 2009 Exponential growth, animal welfare, environmental and food safety impact: the case of China's livestock production. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22(3): 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-008-9140-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y, Wu, N, Xu, R, Li, L, Zhou, W and Zhou, X 2017 Empirical analysis of pig welfare levels and their impacts on pig breeding effi-ciency based on 773 pig farmers’ survey data. PLoS One 12(12): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, V, Hemlin, S and White, J 2004 Natural behaviour, animal rights, or making money. A study of Swedish organic farmers’ view of animal issues. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17:157–179. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAGE.0000017393.31486.c2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, J 1981 Farmers and the education of their families. Sociology Research Monograph Number 2 pp 23. University of New England Press: Armidale, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
McOrist, S and Done, S 2007 High fever swine disease impacts in Asia. Journal of Swine Health Production 15: 257Google Scholar
McOrist, S, Khampee, K and Guo, A 2011 Modern pig farming in the People's Republic of China: Growth and veterinary chal-lenges. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties (Paris) 30(3): 961–968. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.30.3.2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouttotou, N, Hatchell, FM and Green, LE 1998 Adventitious bursitis of the hock in finishing pigs: prevalence, distribution and association with floor type and foot lesions. Veterinary Record 142:109–114. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.142.5.109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, BL and Zhao, R 2012 Farm animal welfare across bor-ders: a vision for the future. Animal Frontiers 2(3): 46–50. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2012-0048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyserman, D, Coon, HM and Kemmelmeier, M 2002 Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 128(1): 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.1.3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, N and Yang, A 2012 Online environmental community members’ intention to participate in environmental activities: An application of the theory of planned behaviour in the Chinese context. Computers in Human Behavior 28: 1298–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porcher, J, Cousson-Gélie, F and Dantzer, R 2004 Affective components of the human-animal relationship in animal hus-bandry: development and validation of a questionnaire. Psychological Reports 95: 275–290. https://doi.org/10.2466 pr0.95.1.275-290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstock, IM 1974 The health belief model and preventive health behaviour. Health Education Monographs 2: 354–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J, Haley, D and de Passillé, AM 2007 Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behavior and leg injuries of lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90: 3647–3651. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seabrook, MF 2001 The effect of the operational environment and operating protocols on the attitudes and behaviour of employed stockpersons. In: Hovi, M and Bouilhol, M (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd NAHWOA Workshop, Human-Animal Relationship: Stockmanship and Housing in Organic Livestock Systems pp 21–30. 21-24 October 2000, Clermont-Ferrand, FranceGoogle Scholar
Seabrook, MF and Bartle, NC 1992 Environmental factors influencing the production and welfare of farm animals, human fac-tors. In: Phillips, CJC and Piggins, D (eds) Farm Animals and the Environment pp 111–130. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, M, Zito, S, Idrus, Z, Yan, W, van Nhiem, D, Na Lampang, P and Phillips, CJC 2017 Attitudes of stakeholders to animal welfare during slaughter and transport in SE and E Asia. Animal Welfare 26: 417–425. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.26.4.417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Z, Wanberg, C, Niu, X and Xie, Y 2006 Action state ori-entation and the theory of planned behavior: A study of job search in China. Journal of Vocational Behaviour 68: 490–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, KE and Panayiotopoulos, P 1999 Predicting behav-ioural intention in a small business context. Journal of Marketing Practice 5(3): 89. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, K, Yu, X, Zhao, T, Feng, Y, Cao, Z, Wang, C, Hu, Y, Chen, X, Hu, D, Tian, X, Liu, D, Zhang, S, Deng, X, Ding, Y, Yang, L, Zhang, Y, Xiao, H, Qiao, M, Wang, B, Hou, L, Wang, X, Yang, X, Kang, L, Sun, M, Jin, P, Wang, S, Kitamura, Y, Yan, J and Gao, G 2007 Emergence of fatal PRRSV variants: unparalleled outbreaks of atypical PRRS in China and molecular dissection of the unique hallmark. PLoS One 2(6): 526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tuyttens, FAM, Vanhonacker, F, Verhille, B, De Brabander, D and Verbeke, V 2012 Pig producer attitude towards surgical castration of piglets without anaesthesia versus alternative strate-gies. Research in Veterinary Science 92: 524–530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.02.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Menke, C and Coleman, G 2002 The relation-ship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 79: 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00155-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C and Gu, H 2014 Consumer's preference for animal welfare and other quality attributes. Management World 7: 67–82Google Scholar
Wang, X, Wu, X, Yan, P, Gao, W, Chen, Y and Sui, P 2016 Integrated analysis on economic and environmental consequences of livestock husbandry on different scale in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 119: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whay, HR 2007 The journey to animal welfare improvement. Animal Welfare 16: 117–122Google Scholar
Wolff, C 2012 Validation of the Nordic Disease Recording Systems for dairy cattle. Doctoral Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
Wu, N, Qiao, M, Zhang, B, Cheng, W-D and Zhu, Y-G 2010 Abundance and diversity of tetracycline resistant genes in soils adjacent to representative swine feedlots in China. Environmental Science Technology 44(18): 6933–6939. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1007802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhigang, X 2002 GM rules don't block imported products. China Daily, Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China: ChinaGoogle Scholar
Yan, QH, Li, YB, You, XL, Zhang, M, Liu, ZP and Ge, Y 2013 An investigation on social attitude on animal welfare in China. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University 3: 99–105Google Scholar
Yip, W, Subramaniana, S, Mitchella, AD, Leeb, DTS, Wang, J and Kawachia, I 2007 Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China. Social Science & Medicine 64: 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zili, J and Kolesar, R 2012 WSPA and APSRI humane slaughter programme in China: STEPS®. Animal Welfare 21(1): 95–97. https://doi.org/10.7120/096272812X13353700593761CrossRefGoogle Scholar