Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:59:55.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Bedding on the Behaviour and Welfare of Pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

D S Arey
D S Arey*
Affiliation:
Centre for Rural Building, The Scottish Agricultural College, Craibstone, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9TR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Straw bedding provides a number of functions which affect the behaviour and welfare of pigs including comfort, recreation and diet. It has been suggested that the importance of these different functions will vary depending on the life/production stage of the pig. The available literature indicates that all of the above functions are relevant to all the different stages except newly born piglets. The occupational value of straw appears to be highly important. The actual mechanisms by which straw affects the pig's motivation systems are still poorly understood. It is therefore uncertain whether suitable alternatives to bedding exist or even if straw bedding in itself is completely satisfactory. Until satisfactory alternatives are available straw bedding should continue to be recommended in terms of pig behaviour and welfare.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourpigsstraw bedding
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , August 1993 , pp. 235 - 246
Copyright
© 1993 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Appleby, M C and Lawrence, A B 1987 Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Production 45: 103–110Google Scholar
Arcy, D S 1990 Accommodation for the Peri-parturient Sow. PhD Thesis: University of AberdeenGoogle Scholar
Arcy, D S 1991 Tail-biting in pigs. Farm Buildings Progress 105: 20–23Google Scholar
Arey, D S 1992 Straw and food as reinforcers for prepartal sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 33: 217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arey, D S, Pctchey, A M and Fowler, V R 1991 The preparturient behaviour of sows in enriched pens and the effect of pre-formed nests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arey, D S, Pctchey, A M and Fowler, V R 1992 The effect of straw on farrowing site choice and nest building in sows. Animal Production 54: 129–134Google Scholar
Aumaitre, A and Le, Dividich J 1984 Improvement of piglet survival in relation to farrowing systems and conditions. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 15: 173–181Google ScholarPubMed
Bäckström, L 1973 Environment and animal health in piglet production. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Supplementum 41: 1–240Google Scholar
Barczewski, R A 1987 Studies on the Pre-parturient Behaviors of Sows and the Post-parturient Behaviors of Piglets to 21 days. PhD Dissertation: University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M R 1982 The nesting behaviour of sows and its disturbance by confinement at farrowing. In Bessei W (ed) Disturbed Behaviour in Farm Animals pp 101–114. Hohenheimer Arbeiten, 121Google Scholar
Baxter, M R 1983 Ethology in environmental design for animal production. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 207–220Google Scholar
Baxter, M R and Pctherick, J C 1980 The effect of restraint on parturition in the sow. In Nielson N C, Hogh P and Bille N (eds) Proceedings of the International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, p 84 June-July 1980, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Baxter, S H 1984 Intensive Pig Production: Environmental Management and Design. Granada: LondonGoogle Scholar
Bengtsson, A C, Svendsen, J and Persson, G 1983 Comparison of four types of housing for sows in gestation: behaviour and hygiene studies. Sverges Lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen for Lantbrukets Byggnadsteknik Rapport 36Google Scholar
Broom, D M and Potter, M J 1984 Factors affecting the occurrence of stereotypies in stall-houses dry sows. In Unshelm J, Putten G van and Zeeb K (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference in Applied Ethology of Farm Animals, pp 229–231. Darmstadt KTBLGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M 1986 Stereotypies and responsiveness as welfare indicators in stalled-housed sows. Animal Production 42: 438–439Google Scholar
Brouns, F, Edwards, S A and English, PR 1991 Voluntary food intake of fibrous diets and its effects on behaviour patterns of dry sows. Paper presented at 42nd Annual Meeting of European Association of Animal Production. Berlin: Germany 9-12 September 1991Google Scholar
Bruce, J M and Clark, J J 1979 Models of heat production and critical temperature for growing pigs. Animal Production 28: 353–369Google Scholar
Buré, R G 1981 The influence of housing conditions on social behaviour in pigs. In Sybesma, W (ed) The Welfare of Pigs pp 159–161. (Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Volume 11). Martinus Nijhoff: The HagueGoogle Scholar
Buré, R G, Kerk, P and Koomans, P van de 1983 Het verstrekken van stro, compost en tuinaarde aan mestvarkens. (The supply of straw, compost and garden mould to fattening pigs). Publikatie, Instituut voor Mechanisatie, Arbeid en Gebouwen (No 190) 23 ppGoogle Scholar
Edwards, S A and Furniss, S J 1988 The effects of straw in crated farrowing systems on peripartal behaviour of sows and piglets. British Veterinary Journal 144: 139–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, S A and Lightfoot, A L 1985 Effects of farrowing crate design and floor type on pig performance and leg and teat damage. (Abstract). Animal Production 40: 545Google Scholar
Ekesbo, I 1980 Some environmentally evoked animal health and welfare problems in modem husbandry. Animal Regulation Studies 3: 119–128Google Scholar
Etter-Kjelsaas, H 1986 Schweinemast im Offenfront-Tiefstreustall. (Pig rearing in the open-fronted, deep-litter stall.) Eidgenossisches Forschungsanstalt fur Betriebswirtschaft und Landtechnik. Tänikon/TG: SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A F and Broom, D M 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Baillière Tindall: LondonGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1975 The effect of straw on the behaviour of sows in tether stalls. Animal Production 21: 59–68Google Scholar
Fraser, D 1983 The role of behaviour in swine production: a review. Applied Animal Ethology 11: 317–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D 1985 Selection of bedded and unbedded areas by pigs in relation to environmental temperature and behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 14: 117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, D, Phillips, P A, Thompson, B K and Tennessen, T 1991 Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30: 307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloor, P and Leimbacher, A 1984 Gruppenbucht für Galtsauen. (Group housing for dry sows). Blätter für Landtechnik 249: 1–6Google Scholar
Grauvogl, A 1987 The significance of straw for the behaviour of piglets. In Marx, D, Grauvogl, A and Smidt, D (eds) Welfare Aspects of Pig Rearing pp 94–100. Commission of the European Communities: BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Graves, H B 1984 Behavior and ecology of wild and feral swine. Journal of Animal Science 58: 482–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundlach, H 1968 Brutfürsorge, Brutpflege, Verhaltensontogenese und Tagesperiodik beim Europäischen Wildschwein (Sus scrofa L) (Maternal care, behavioural ontogeny and circadian activity in the European Wild Boar (Sus scrofa L). Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 25: 955–995Google ScholarPubMed
Hansen, L L and Hagclsø, A M 1980 A general survey of environmental influence on the social hierarchy function in pigs. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 30: 388–392Google Scholar
Hutson, G D 1988 Do sows need straw for nest-building? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 28: 187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, G D and Haskell, M J 1990 The behaviour of farrowing sows with free and operant access to an earth floor. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26: 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, P 1982 Die Schweinemast im Offenfront-Tiefstreustall. (Pig fattening in an open-front, deep-straw stall). Schriftenreihe der Eidg. Forschungsanstalt für Betriebswirtschaft und Landtechnik 15: 69–81Google Scholar
Jensen, P 1981 Fixeringens effekt pa sinsuggors beteende. II. Sinsuggors beteends med halm, samt sociala beteenden i tre olika uppstallningsmiljoer. (Effect of confinement on the behaviour of dry sows. II. Behaviour with straw and social behaviour). Svensk Veterinartidning 33: 108–115Google Scholar
Jensen, P 1989 Nest site choice and nest building of free-ranging domestic pigs due to farrow. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen, L E 1982 Teat order in groups of piglets reared on an artificial sow. I. Formation of teat order and influence of milk yield on teat preference. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongebreur, A A 1983 Housing design and welfare in livestock production. In Baxter S H, Baxter M R and MacCormack J A C (eds) Farm Animal Housing and Welfare pp 256–269. Martinus Nijhoff: The HagueGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, R and Dalton, C 1984 Livestock Behaviour: a Practical Guide. Granada: LondonGoogle Scholar
Kurz, J C and Marchinton, R L 1972 Radio telemetry studies of feral hogs in South Carolina. Journal of Wildlife Management 36: 1240–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, J, Kloeppel, P and Kallweit, E 1984 A case of reversed cannibalism: the piglets damaging the sow. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 15: 275–277Google ScholarPubMed
Lammers, G J and de, Lange A 1986 Pre- and post-farrowing behaviour in Primiparous domesticated pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15: 31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, A J, Edwards, S A, Stephens, D B and Walters, D E 1989 Behaviour of groups of weaner pigs in three different housing systems. British Veterinary Journal 145: 367–372Google ScholarPubMed
Madsen, A 1980 Environmental influence on health of bacon pigs. Proceedings of the International Pig Veterinary Society p 320, June 30 - July 3, 1980. Copenhagen: DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Marx, D and Schuster, H 1986 Ethologische Wahlversuche mit frühabgesetzten Ferkeln während der Flatdeckhaltung. (Ethological choice experiments in early weaned piglets kept on flat decks. 4. Ranking of type of floor, area dimensions and stimulation (straw) and conclusions for evaluating flat-deck housing). Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 93: 75–80Google Scholar
Metz, J H M and Oosterlee, C C 1981 Immunologische und ethologische Kriterien für die artgemässe Haltung von Sauen und Ferkeln. (Immunological and ethological criteria for appropriate housing of sows and piglets. Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemässen Tierhaltung pp 39–50. 1980 KTBL - Schrift, 264Google Scholar
Mwanjali, S, Smidt, D and Ellendorf, F 1982 A multiple free choice model for pigs. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, C A 1993 Behaviour and Other Indices of Welfare in Grower/Finisher Pigs kept in Straw-Flow, Bare-concrete, Full-slats and Deep-straw. PhD Thesis: University of AberdeenGoogle Scholar
Penny, R H C, Osborne, A D, Wright, A I and Stephens, T R 1965 Foot rot in pigs: observations on the clinical diseases. Veterinary Record 77: 1101–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pflug, R 1976 Geburtsverhalten von Sauen und Verhaltensweisen ihrer Ferkel. (Behaviour of the sow and her piglets at parturition in relation to rearing conditions). Kuratorium fur Technik und Bauwesen in der Land-wirtschaft, Paper 203. Munster-HiltrupGoogle Scholar
Putten, G van and Dammers, J 1976 A comparative study of the well-being of piglets reared conventionally and in cages. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 339–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putten, G van 1980 Objective observations on the behaviour of fattening pigs. Animal Regulation Studies 3: 105–118Google Scholar
Robertson, I B 1985 Observations of behaviour patterns in young pigs in four differing environments. State Veterinary Journal 39: 33–41Google Scholar
Rooijen, J van 1980 Wahlversuche, eine ethologische Methode zum erfassen und zu beurteilen. (Understanding and evaluating welfare using choice tests). Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemässen Tierhaltung, KTBL-Schrift 281: 174–185Google Scholar
Sachsenmaier, M M 1984 Effect of Weaning Time and Type of Housing on the Behaviour of Piglets up to Three Months of Age. Inaugural Dissertation: Justus-Liebig-Universität, GiessenGoogle Scholar
Sambraus, H H 1976 Kronismus bei Schweinen. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 83: 17–19Google Scholar
Scheuten, W G P 1986 Rearing Conditions and Behaviour in Pigs. PhD Thesis: Agricultural University of Wageningen, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Schouten, W G P 1987 Effects of rearing conditions on the behaviour of gilts around farrowing (Abstract). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schouten, W G P 1991 Effects of rearing on subsequent performance in pigs. Pig News and Information 12: 245–247Google Scholar
Schunke, B 1980 Behavioural Abnormalities in Breeding Sows in Single Stalls. Inaugural Dissertation: Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, MünchenGoogle Scholar
Smith, W J and Mitchell, C D 1976 Floor surface treatment to prevent lameness in suckling pigs. Farm Building Progress 43: 17–19Google Scholar
Smith, W J and Smith, M 1990 Adventitious bursitis of the hock: results of study examining the epidemiology and development. Proceedings of the International Pig Veterinary Society 11th Congress p300, July 1-5 1990, LausanneGoogle Scholar
Stolba, A and Wood-Gush, DGM 1984 The identification of behavioural key features and their incorporation into a housing design for pigs. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 15: 287–298Google ScholarPubMed
Stolba, A and Wood-Gush, DGM 1989 The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Animal Production 48: 419–425Google Scholar
Terlouw, EMC, Lawrence, A B and Illius, A W 1991 Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows. Animal Behaviour 42: 981–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellenga, L and Veen, H M van 1983 Mortality, morbidity and external injuries in piglets housed in two different housing systems. Veterinary Quarterly 5: 101–106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vestergaard, K 1981 Influence of fixation on the behaviour of sows. In Sybesma, W (ed) The Welfare of Pigs pp 16–30. (Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Volume 11). Martinus Nijhoff: The HagueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergaard, K 1984 An evaluation of ethological criteria and methods in the assessment of well-being in sows. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 15: 227–235Google ScholarPubMed
Vestergaard, K and Hansen, L L 1984 Tethered versus loose sows: ethological observations and measures of productivity. I. Ethological observations during pregnancy and farrowing. Annales de Recherches Vétérinaires 15: 245–256Google ScholarPubMed
Widowski, T M and Curtis, S E 1990 The influence of straw, cloth tassel or both on the prepartum behaviour of sows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiepkema, P R, Broom, D M, Duncan, I J H and van, Putten G 1983 Abnormal Behaviours in Farm Animals. Commission of the European Communities: BrusselsGoogle Scholar
Wood-Gush, DGM and Bcilharz, R G 1983 The enrichment of a bare environment for animals in confined conditions. Applied Animal Ethology 10: 209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar