Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:28:41.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of hiding enrichment on stress levels and behaviour of domestic cats (Felis sylvestris catus) in a shelter setting and the implications for adoption potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

K Kry*
Affiliation:
38 Spokane Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2W 0M5, Canada
R Casey
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: klkry@yahoo.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study investigates the effect of hiding enrichment on stress and behaviour of kennelled cats. Forty-three cats were studied either with a BC SPCA Hide & Perch™ box as enrichment, or with an open bed as control. Observations consisted of Stress Score, approach test and scan sample, recorded daily over the five days following a cat's entrance into the adoption centre, and again on the 14th day if the cat was still present. Days until adoption was noted for cats adopted during the study period. A survey was given to adopters of study cats in an attempt to determine the motivations underlying their choice of cat.

A significant reduction in stress was noted between all study days in the enriched group. Stress levels in this group declined further between the fifth and the 14th day, while those of the control group increased. Cats in the enriched group were significantly more likely to approach and displayed relaxed behaviours much more frequently. No significant difference was found between the two groups in days until adoption, percentage adopted, or in the reasons provided by the new owners in the adoption survey; however temperament was found to be the highest ranked reason for choosing a cat from either group.

Results of this study suggest that the welfare of kennelled cats is greatly improved if they are provided with the opportunity to perform effective hiding behaviour, and that the ability to perform such a behaviour does not decrease the likelihood of those cats being adopted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Archer, J 1979 Studies in Biology No 108: Animals Under Stress. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Beaver, B 1992 Feline Behaviour: A Guide for Veterinarians. WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia, USAGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Brown, JL and Seidensticker, J 1993a Behavioural and adrenocortical responses to environmental changes in leopard cats (Felis bengalensis). Zoo Biology 12(4): 321331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K, Brown, JL and Strawn, W 1993b Behavioural and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 143158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, MS 1998 Evolution and animal welfare. Quarterly Review of Biology 73(3): 305324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feaver, J, Mendl, M and Bateson, P 1986 A method for rating the individual distinctiveness of domestic cats. Animal Behaviour 34: 10161025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, T 2002 An investigation into the behavioural changes which occur in domestic cats (Felis sylvestris catus) over time as a response to confinement in animal shelters. Unpublished MSc thesis. University of Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Griffith, CA, Steigerwald, ES and Buffington, CAT 2000 Effects of a synthetic facial pheromone on behaviour of cats. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 217(8): 11541156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, BL and Pedersen, NC 1991 Behaviour. In: Pratt, PW (ed) Feline Husbandry: Diseases and Management in the Multiple Cat Environment pp 289323. American Veterinary Publications, Inc: California, USAGoogle Scholar
Heidenberger, E 1997 Housing conditions and behavioural problems of indoor cats as assessed by their owners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 52: 345364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, R 1993 Environmental enrichment for confined dogs and cats. In: The TJ Hungerford Refresher Course for Veterinarians Proceedings. 214: The Postgraduate Committee in Veterinary Science pp 191197. University of Sydney: Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, C 1995 The effects of positive handling on the behaviour of domestic cats in rescue centres. Unpublished MSc thesis. University of Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Kessler, MR and Turner, DC 1997 Stress and adaptation of cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly, in pairs and in groups in boarding catteries. Animal Welfare 6: 243254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, MR and Turner, DC 1999a Socialization and stress in cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed singly and in groups in animal shelters. Animal Welfare 8: 1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, MR and Turner, DC 1999b Effects of density and cage size on stress in domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) housed in animal shelters and boarding catteries. Animal Welfare 8: 259267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberg, G 1996 Feline behaviour and welfare. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 208(4): 502505Google ScholarPubMed
Levine, S 1985 A definition of stress? In: Moberg GP (ed) Animal Stress pp 5169. American Psychological Society: Maryland, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveridge, GG, Horrocks, LJ and Hawthorne, AJ 1995 Environmentally enriched housing for cats when housed singly. Animal Welfare 4: 135141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, S 1994 Caged cats: avoiding problems and providing solutions. Newsletter of the Companion Animal Study Group 7: 19Google Scholar
McCune, S 1995 Enriching the environment of the laboratory cat. In: Environmental Enrichment Information Resources for Laboratory Animals 1965-1995: Birds, Cats, Dogs, Farm Animals, Ferrets, Rabbits and Rodents pp 2541. US Department of Agriculture: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Mendl, M and Harcourt, R 2000 Individuality in the domestic cat: origins, development and stability. In: Turner, DC and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: the Biology of its Behaviour, 2nd edition pp 4764. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Moberg, GP 2000 Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In: Moberg, GP and Mench, JA (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare pp 122. CABI Publishing: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, RC 1995 Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 229243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podberscek, AL 1997 Illuminating issues of companion animal welfare through research into human-animal interactions. Animal Welfare 6: 365372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I 1999 Recommendations for the housing of cats in the home, in catteries and animal shelters, in laboratories and in veterinary surgeries. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 1: 181191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochlitz, I 2000 Feline welfare issues. In: Turner, DC and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: the Biology of its Behaviour, 2nd edition pp 207226. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Rochlitz, I, Podberscek, AL and Broom, DM 1998 Welfare of cats in a quarantine cattery. Veterinary Record 143: 3539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rukavina, GM 2001 Coping with cage stress in boarding dogs and cats. Veterinary Technician 22: 646652Google Scholar
Smith, DF, Durman, KJ, Roy, DB and Bradshaw, JW 1994 Behavioural aspects of the welfare of rescued cats. The Journal of the Feline Advisory Bureau 31: 2528Google Scholar
Soules, C 2002 Improving Cat Welfare. Animal Sense 3(1): 15Google Scholar
Toates, F 2000 Multiple factors controlling behaviour: Implications for stress and welfare. In: Moberg, GP and Mench, JA (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare pp 199226. CABI Publishing: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, DC 2000 The human-cat relationship. In: Turner, DC and Bateson, P (eds) The Domestic Cat: the Biology of its Behaviour, 2nd edition pp 193206. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
UK Cat Behaviour Working Group 1995 An ethogram for behavioural studies of the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus). Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, Herts, UKGoogle Scholar
Watt, SL and Waran, NK 1993 Companion animal cruelty: who are the offenders? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 295296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, B 1995 Coping and coping strategies: a behavioural view. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 43: 123134CrossRefGoogle Scholar