Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:19:14.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of training on the inter-observer reliability of lameness scoring in dairy cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

S March ,
J Brinkmann  and
C Winkler
S March*
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Animal Production and Technology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Driverstraße 22, 49377 Vechta, Germany
J Brinkmann
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Animal Production and Technology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Driverstraße 22, 49377 Vechta, Germany
C Winkler
Affiliation:
Division of Livestock Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: solveig.march@agr.uni-goettingen.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the present study, the effect of training on inter-observer reliability was studied for a 5-category lameness scoring system used for routine on-farm surveys of welfare in dairy cattle. The inter-observer agreement between an experienced and an initially inexperienced observer was determined during an initial training phase and at specific time points in the course of data collection in 46 herds. During the training phase on three farms, inter-observer reliability increased to an acceptable level for both the 5-category gait scoring system and the distinction between lame and non-lame cows.

The 4th testing after 17 on-farm visits revealed a considerable increase in inter-observer reliability which was further improved in the course of the on-farm visits.

In conclusion, acceptable inter-observer agreement for differentiating between non-lame and lame cows was achieved after only a brief introduction. In order to obtain high inter-observer repeatability with the 5-category gait scoring system used in this study, (more) intensive training procedures are required.

Keywords

animal welfaregait-scoringinter-observer reliabilitylamenessobserver trainingPABAK
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , May 2007 , pp. 131 - 133
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Baadsgaard, NP and Enevoldsen, C 1997 A potential approach to support animal welfare promotion in a Danish veterinary practice context. Proceedings of the Society of Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine. 8-11 July 1997. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
Byrt, T, Bishop, J and Carlin, JB 1993 Bias, prevalence and kappa. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46: 423–429CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Rosa, G, Tripaldi, C, Napolitano, F, Saltalamacchia, F, Grasso, F, Bisegna, V and Bordi, A 2003 Repeatability of some animal-related variables in dairy cows and buffaloes. Animal Welfare 12: 625–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, B, Bruin, G, Andre, G and Buist, W 2003 Assessment of observer performance in a subjective scoring system: visual classification of the gait of cows. Journal of Agricultural Science 140: 317–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarson, S 2000 Laying hens in loose housing systems. Clinical, ethological and epidemiological aspects. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae Veterinaria 73: 44Google Scholar
Habison, JL, Slater, MR and Howe, LM 2002 Repeatability and prediction from a telephone questionnaire measuring diet and activity level in cats. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 55: 79–94Google Scholar
Holzhauer, M, Middelesch, H, Bartels, C and Frankena, K 2004 Evaluation of a Dutch claw health scoring system in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the 13th international symposium and 5th conference on lameness in ruminants. 11-15 February 2004. Maribor, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
Keppler, C, Schubbert, A and Knierim, U 2004 Welche Methoden sind zur Beurteilung von Hühnern im Hinblick auf Federpicken und Kannibalismus geeignet? Erste Untersuchungen zum Vergleich verschiedener Methoden im Hinblick auf Durchführbarkeit, Aussagekraft und Wiederholbarkeit. 11. Freilandtagung/ 17. IGN-Tagung: 71-74. [Title translation: Which methods are adequate to assess laying hens in terms of feather picking and cannibalism? First comparative investigations of methods with regard to feasibility, validity and repeatability]Google Scholar
O'Callaghan, KA, Murray, RD and Cripps, PJ 2002 Behavioural indicators of pain associated with lameness in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Lameness in Ruminants. 9-13 January 2002. Orlando, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
Petersen, HH, Enøe, C and Nielsen, CO 2004 Observer agreement on pen level prevalence of clinical signs in finishing pigs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 64: 147–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousing, T and Waiblinger, S 2004 Evaluation of on-farm methods for testing the human-animal relationship in dairy herds with cubicle loose housing systems: Test-retest and inter-observer reliability and consistency to familiarity of test person. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85: 215–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckler, C and Willen, S 2001 The reliability and repeatability of a lameness scoring system for use as an indicator of welfare in dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science, Supplement 30: 103–107Google Scholar
Winckler, C, Capdeville, J, Gebresenbet, G, Hörning, B, Roiha, U, Tosi, M and Waiblinger, S 2003 Selection of parameters for on-farm welfare-assessment protocols in cattle and buffalo. Animal Welfare 12: 619–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar