Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:50:52.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Winter Climatic Conditions on the Behaviour of Adult Ostriches (Struthio Camelus) on a British Farm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

D C Deeming
D C Deeming*
Affiliation:
Honorary Research Associate, School of Biological Sciences, c/o 3.329 Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Manchester, Ml 3 9PT, UK
*
Address for correspondence and requests for reprints: 17 Rowland Close, Wallingford, Oxon OX10 8LA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Ostrich welfare on farms of is great importance, particularly because little is known about appropriate husbandry conditions for these birds in a northern European environment. Rain has been shown to influence the pattern of behaviour during the spring months. This study examined the effects of four different climatic conditions (raining, dull but overcast, bright but overcast and sunny) on the behaviour of ostriches during the winter. Compared with dry conditions, there was a significantly higher rate of sitting during rainy periods — apparently at the expense of foraging (from pasture) and pacing (around the perimeter). The rate of sitting was much lower than that reported for the same birds during rain in the spring. During all climatic conditions, feeding (on concentrate feed provided) and foraging were the most dominant behaviours. Feeding was not significantly affected by rain but the frequency of foraging was reduced. Standing was a common behaviour. There were significant gender differences for standing (males > females) and foraging (females > males). These results show that winter conditions require ostriches to feed and forage at higher rates than during the spring or summer, presumably to consume more energy for thermoregulation. Gender differences in pacing and feeding behaviours previously observed in breeding birds were absent in non-breeding ostriches (presumably because males were not defending territories); although non-breeding males appeared to be more vigilant than females and needed to consume more food. Improvements in ostrich husbandry should take into account the need to provide both adequate shelter and more concentrate rations during the cold weather of winter. Energy requirements will be higher at this time, yet the ability of the birds to forage will be diminished. Without such considerations, ostrich welfare during the winter in northern Europe will be compromised.

Keywords

animal welfarebehaviourfarmingostrichwinter weather
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , August 1998 , pp. 307 - 315
Copyright
© 1998 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anon 1997 Draft recommendations concerning ratites (ostriches, emus and rheas). Appendix 3. Ostriches. Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes. T-AP (94) final version. Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes: Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
Bertram, B C R 1993 Welfare Standards for the Humane Farming of Ostriches in the United Kingdom. Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: Horsham, UKGoogle Scholar
Bubier, N E, Paxton, C G M, Bowers, P and Deeming, D C (in press) Courtship behaviour of ostriches (Struthio camelus) towards humans under farming conditions in Britain. British Poultry Science:Google Scholar
Deeming, D C 1997 Effect of climatic conditions on the behaviour of adult ostriches (Struthio camelus) in Britain. Animal Welfare 6: 349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deeming, D C (in press) Effects of gender and time of day on the winter time-activity budget of adult ostriches (Struthio camelus) in a farming environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science:Google Scholar
Deeming, D C, Dick, ACK and Ayres, L L 1996 Ostrich Chick Rearing. A Stockman's Guide. Ratite Conference: Oxfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Degen, A A, Kam, M and Rosenstrauch, A 1989 Time-activity budget of ostriches (Struthio camelus) offered concentrate feed and maintained in outdoor pens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 22: 347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993 Measuring Behaviour. An Introductory Guide, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeegan, DEF and Deeming, D C 1997 Effects of gender and group size on the time-activity budgets of adult breeding ostriches (Struthio camelus) in a farming environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiner, G, Scitz, K and Dzapo, V 1996 A survey of farming environment and ostrich behaviour in Germany. In: Deeming, D C (ed) Improving our Understanding of Ratites in a Farming Environment pp 23–24. Ratite Conference: Oxfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Ross, E J and Deeming, D C 1998 Feeding and vigilance behaviour of breeding ostriches (Struthio camelus) in a farming environment in Britain. British Poultry Science 37: 173–177Google Scholar
Sambraus, H H 1994 The circadian rhythm in the behaviour of ostriches (Struthio camelus) kept in pens. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 107: 339–341Google Scholar