Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:21:05.046Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) rank monkey chow in relation to other foods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

E Addessi ,
M Stammati ,
G Sabbatini  and
E Visalberghi
E Addessi
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Ulisse Aldrovandi, 16/b, 00197 Roma, Italy
M Stammati
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Ulisse Aldrovandi, 16/b, 00197 Roma, Italy Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell'Uomo, Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Viale dell'Università 32, 00185 Roma, Italy
G Sabbatini
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Ulisse Aldrovandi, 16/b, 00197 Roma, Italy Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell'Uomo, Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, Viale dell'Università 32, 00185 Roma, Italy
E Visalberghi*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Ulisse Aldrovandi, 16/b, 00197 Roma, Italy
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: elisabetta.visalberghi@istc.cnr.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Captive primates are usually fed on monkey chow, a high-energy food designed to provide a complete and balanced diet for primates. In addition to the nutritional value of a food, its palatability, frequency of presentation in the daily diet and sensory stimulation may also be important for determining whether it is accepted by the animals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the food preferences of 26 captive capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) using monkey chow and a variety of foods, which ranged from being very familiar to completely novel to the monkeys, and to assess whether the frequency of presentation in the daily diet and sensory stimulation affected their food preferences. Food preferences were scored in terms of the food item chosen and whether it was then eaten. In Experiment 1, subjects encountered paired combinations of seven familiar foods (present in the monkeys' diet with different frequencies), including monkey chow. In Experiments 2 and 3, monkey chow was paired with seven novel foods (not previously present in the monkeys' diet) and seven ex-novel foods (previously only encountered repeatedly during an earlier experiment) respectively. The results show that monkey chow, despite its high energy content, was not very attractive to capuchin monkeys. Other familiar foods (especially those not presented daily) were chosen and eaten more frequently than the monkey chow, and novel foods were chosen more frequently than the monkey chow. The findings of this study have implications for the feeding husbandry of captive primates. Familiar foods presented in the diet each day are less preferred; therefore good practice would be to alternate foods over time. Occasional presentation of novel food items could be a stimulating and economical method of providing sensory enrichment.

Keywords

animal welfareCebus apelladietary husbandryfood preferencesmonkey chow
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , August 2005 , pp. 215 - 222
Copyright
© 2005 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Agostini, I and Visalberghi, E 2005 Social influences on the acquisition of sex — typical foraging patterns by juveniles in a group of wild tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus). American Journal of Primatology 65: 335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service) 1999 Final report on environment enhancement to promote the psychological well-being of non-human primates. US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Animal Care: Riverdale MD, USAGoogle Scholar
Balleine, BW and Dickinson, A 1998 Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology 37: 407–419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BANR (Board of Agriculture and Natural Resources) 2003 Nutrient Requirements of Nonhuman Primate, 2nd Edition. The National Academies Press: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, RB 1985 Orangutan's colour preference for food items. Zoo Biology 4: 287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskerville, M 1999 Old World monkeys. In: Poole, T (ed) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Volume I pp 611–635. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Bearder, SK and Pitts, RS 1999 Prosimians. In: Poole, T (ed) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Volume I pp 542–558. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Blundell, JE and Stubbs, RJ 1999 High and low carbohydrate and fat intakes: limits imposed by appetite and palatability and their implications for energy balance. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 53 (Suppl 1): S148-S165Google Scholar
Brown, AD and Zunino, GE 1990 Dietary variability in Cebus apella in extreme habitats: evidence for adaptability. Folia Primatologica 54: 187–195CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, CA and Chapman, LJ 1990 Dietary variability in primate populations. Primates 31: 121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH and Harvey, PH 1977 Species differences in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In: Clutton-Brock, TH (ed) Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes pp 557–584. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
De Lillo, C and Visalberghi, E 1994 Transfer index and mediational learning in tufted capuchins (Cebus apella). International Journal of Primatology 15: 275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drapier, M, Addessi, E and Visalberghi, E 2003 Response of Cebus apella to foods flavored with familiar and novel odor. International Journal of Primatology 24: 295–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erkert, HG 1999 Owl monkeys. In: Poole, T (ed) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Volume I pp 576–590. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Flurer, C, Scheid, R and Zucker, H 1983 Evaluation of a pelleted diet in a colony of marmosets and tamarins. Laboratory Animal Science 33: 264–267Google Scholar
Fragaszy, D 1986 Time budgets and foraging behavior in wedge-capped capuchins (Cebus olivaceus): age and sex differences. In: Taub, D and King, F (eds) Current Perspectives in Primate Social Dynamics pp 159–174. Van Nostrand: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D 1990 Sex and age differences in the organization of behavior in wedge-capped capuchins, Cebus olivaceus. Behavioral Ecology 1: 81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D, Fedigan, L and Visalberghi, E 2004 The Complete Capuchin. The Biology of the Genus Cebus. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D, Visalberghi, E and Galloway, A 1997 Infant tufted capuchin monkey's behavior with novel foods: opportunism, not selectivity. Animal Behaviour 53: 1337–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D, Visalberghi, E and Robinson, J 1990 Variability and adaptability in the genus Cebus. Folia Primatologica 54: 114–118CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hetherington, MM and Rolls, BJ 1996 Sensory-specific satiety: theoretical frameworks and central characteristics. In: Capaldi, ED (ed) Why We Eat What We Eat: The Psychology of Eating pp 267–290. American Psychological Association: Washington DC, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, WCO 1960 Primates. Comparative Anatomy and Taxonomy, Volume IV. University of Edinburgh Press: Edinburgh, UKGoogle Scholar
Howell, SM, Matevia, M, Fritz, J, Nash, LT and Maki, S 1993 Prefeeding agonism and seasonality in captive groups of Pan troglodytes. Animal Welfare 2: 153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INRAN (Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione) 2000 On-line Database. Carnovale E and Marletta L (eds) Tabelle di Composizione Degli Alimenti. Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione. Available at http://inn.ingrm.it/Documentazione/tabelle.htm [Title translation: Tables of food nutrient and caloric contents]Google Scholar
Kinzey WG (ed) 1997 New World Primates: Ecology, Evolution and Behavior. Aldine de Gruyter: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Matthews, RH, Pehrsson, PR and Farhat-Sabet, M 1987 Sugar content of selected foods: individual and total sugars. Home Economics Research Report 48: Available at www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/Data/Other/herr48.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, SP 1999 Squirrel monkeys. In: Poole, T (ed) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Volume I pp 591–600. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Noonan, A 1998 The effects of environmental enrichment on the behavior of Hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas. Australian Primatology 7: 5–15Google Scholar
Oftedal, OT and Allen, AE 1996 The feeding and nutrition of omnivores with emphasis on primates. In: Kleiman, DG, Allen, ME, Thompson, KV, Lumpkin, S and Harris, H (eds) Wild Mammals in Captivity: Principles and Techniques pp 148–157. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Pelchat, ML and Schaefer, S 2000 Dietary monotony and food cravings in young and elderly adults. Physiology & Behavior 68: 353–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, S and Rose, L 1994 Begging and transfer for coati meat by white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. Primates 35: 409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T, Hubrecht, R and Kirkwood, JK 1999 Marmosets and tamarins. In: Poole, T (ed) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Volume I pp 559–573. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Rolls, BJ 1990 The role of sensory-specific satiety in food intake and food selection. In: Capaldi, ED and Powley, TL (eds) Taste, Experience, and Feeding pp 197–209. American Psychological Association: Washington DC, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapiro, SJ, Suarez, SA, Porter, LM and Bloomsmith, MA 1996 The effects of different types of feeding enhancements on the behavior of single-caged, yearling rhesus macaques. Animal Welfare 5: 129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souci, SW, Fachmann, W and Kraut, H 1999 Food Composition and Nutrition Tables. Wiss Verlagsges: Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Sussman, RW 2000 Primate Ecology and Social Structure, Volume II. Pearson Custom Publishing: Boston MA, USAGoogle Scholar
Swithers-Mulvey, SE and Hall, WG 1992 Control of ingestion by oral habituation in rat pups. Behavioural Neuroscience 106: 710–717CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terborgh, J 1983 Five New World Primates. Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ, USAGoogle Scholar
Ullrey, DE 1989 Nutritional wisdom. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 20: 1–2Google Scholar
Ullrey, DE 1993 Nutrition and predisposition to infectious disease. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 24: 304–314Google Scholar
Visalberghi, E and Addessi, E 2000 Seeing group members eating a familiar food affects the acceptance of novel foods in capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behaviour 60: 69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E and Addessi, E 2003 Food for thought: social learning and the feeding behavior in capuchin monkeys. Insights from the laboratory. In: Fragaszy, D and Perry, S (eds) Traditions in Nonhuman Animals: Models and Evidence pp 187–212. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E and Anderson, JR 1999 Capuchin monkeys. In: Poole, T (ed) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Volume I pp 601–610. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E and Fragaszy, D 1995 The behavior of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) with food: the role of social context. Animal Behaviour 49: 1089–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E, Janson, CH and Agostini, I 2003a Response toward novel foods and novel objects in wild Cebus apella. International Journal of Primatology 24(3): 653–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E, Myowa Yamakoshi, M, Hirata, S and Matsuzawa, T 2002 Responses to novel foods in captive chimpanzees. Zoo Biology 21: 539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visalberghi, E, Sabbatini, G, Stammati, M and Addessi, E 2003b Preferences towards novel foods in Cebus apella: the role of nutrients and social influences. Physiology & Behavior 80: 341–349CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visalberghi, E, Valente, M and Fragaszy, D 1998 Social context and consumption of unfamiliar foods by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) over repeated encounters. American Journal of Primatology 45: 367–3803.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed