Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:31:55.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Keel-bone damage and foot injuries in commercial laying hens in Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

AB Riber  and
LK Hinrichsen
AB Riber*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
LK Hinrichsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: anja.riber@anis.au.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keel-bone damage and foot injuries have a negative impact on welfare in laying hens. The extent of the problems in Danish commercial flocks of layers is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the current prevalence of keel-bone damage and foot injuries in Danish commercial flocks of laying hens and to investigate the effects of production system, housing system, hybrid and age. The occurrences of keel-bone damage, hyperkeratosis and missing toes were higher at 62 compared to 32 weeks of age, while the reverse was found for toe wounds, foot-pad lesions and bumble feet. There was no difference between barn and organic production systems in the risk of having keel-bone fractures and foot injuries, except that barn hens were more likely to have foot-pad lesions than organic hens (32 weeks: 16.1 vs 3.1%). Hens in multi-tiered systems were more likely to have keel-bone fractures compared to hens in single-tiered systems (62 weeks: 11.6 vs 4.9%). Of the four hybrids, Lohmann Brown Lite had a higher risk of keel-bone fractures, whereas bumble feet were found more frequently in Lohmann LSL Keel-bone damage and foot injuries are less common in Danish non-cage systems compared to most of the reporting presently available from other countries. We suggest transnational studies, aimed at identifying the causal factors of this discrepancy, to increase existing knowledge on how to reduce incidences of keel-bone damage and foot injuries.

Keywords

animal welfarefoot injurieshousing systemkeel-bone damagelaying henproduction system
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 179 - 184
Copyright
© 2016 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Abrahamsson, P, Tauson, R and Elwinger, K 1996 Effects on production, health and egg quality of varying proportions of wheat and barley in diets for two hybrids of laying hens kept in different housing systems. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica. Section A, Animal Science 46: 173–182Google Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S 2014 lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4Google Scholar
Bessei, W 2006 Welfare of broilers: a review. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 62: 455–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/WPS2005108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestman, M and Wagenaar, JP 2012 Health and welfare in organic laying hens in The Netherlands Second Organic Animal Husbandry Conference pp 156–159. 12-14 September 2012, Hamburg/Trenthorst, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Casey-Trott, T, Heerkens, J, Petrik, M, Regmi, P, Schrader, L, Toscano, MJ and Widowski, T 2015 Methods for assessment of keel bone damage in poultry. Poultry Science 94: 2339–2350. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CORE organic HealthyHens project 2014 HealthyHens, good health and welfare in organic laying hens depends on good manage-ment. http://www.Coreorganic2.Org/healthyhensGoogle Scholar
Farmer, M, Roland, DA Sr and Clark, AJ 1986 Influence of dietary calcium on bone calcium utilization. Poultry Science 65:337–344. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0650337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, RH, McCormack, HA, McTeir, L and Whitehead, CC 2004 Incidence, pathology and prevention of keel bone defor-mities in the laying hen. British Poultry Science 45: 320–330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071660410001730815CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, RH, McCormack, HA and Whitehead, CC 1998 Bone structure and strength at different ages in laying hens and effects of dietary particulate limestone, vitamin K and ascorbic acid. British Poultry Science 39: 434–440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071669889024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, J and Weisberg, S 2011 An {R} Companion to Applied Regression, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks: CA, USA. http://soc-serv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/CompanionGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, S 2012 Researchers trained to assess organic laying hens. http://www.slu.se/en/collaborative-centres-and-projects/epok-centre-for-organic-food-and-farming-/news-from-epok/2012/6/healthy-hens/Google Scholar
Hinrichsen, L 2015 Animal welfare in organic egg production – with empha-sis on mortality and helminth infections. PhD Thesis, Aarhus University, Denmark. http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/85561971/Ph.d_71955_thesis.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hinrichsen, LK, Riber, AB and Labourian, R 2016 Associations between and development of welfare indicators in organic layers. Animal. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115003018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, PM and Wu, K 2013 Traditional and commercial tur-keys show similar susceptibility to foot pad dermatitis and beha-vioural evidence of pain. British Poultry Science 54: 281–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.781265Google Scholar
Hothorn, T, Bretz, F and Westfall, P 2008 Simultaneous infer-ence in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50: 346–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabell, S 2014 Projekt sundhed og velfærd 2012. Dansk Erhvervsfjerkræ 43: 452–453. [Title translation: Project health and welfare 2012]Google Scholar
Kappeli, S, Gebhardt-Henrich, SG, Frohlich, E, Pfulg, A and Stoffel, MH 2011 Prevalence of keel bone deformities in Swiss laying hens. British Poultry Science 52: 531–536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.615059CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasr, MAF, Murrell, J and Nicol, CJ 2013 The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in indi-vidual laying hens. British Poultry Science 54: 165–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.767437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, MAF, Nicol, CJ and Murrell, J 2012a Do laying hens with keel bone fractures experience pain? PLoS One 7: e42420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042420CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasr, MAF, Murrell, J, Wilkins, LJ and Nicol, CJ 2012b The effect of keel fractures on egg-production parameters, mobility and behaviour in individual laying hens. Animal Welfare 21: 127–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/096272812799129376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, K, Arhant, C, Lugmair, A, Gruber, B and Zaludik, K 2009 Foot pad dermatitis in laying hens kept in non-cage sys-tems in Austria. 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. 18-22 May 2009, Cervia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Petrik, MT, Guerin, MT and Widowski, TM 2013 Keel fracture assessment of laying hens by palpation: inter-observer relia-bility and accuracy. Veterinary Record 173: 500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.101934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrik, MT, Guerin, MT and Widowski, TM 2015 On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indica-tors in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada. Poultry Science 94: 579–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickel, T, Schrader, L and Scholz, B 2011 Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design. Poultry Science 90: 715–724. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Development Core Team 2014 R: A language and environ-ment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Richards, GJ, Wilkins, LJ, Knowles, TG, Booth, F, Toscano, MJ, Nicol, CJ and Brown, SN 2012 Pop hole use by hens with different keel fracture status monitored throughout the laying period. Veterinary Record 170: 494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.100489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodenburg, TB, Tuyttens, FAM, de Reu, K, Herman, L, Zoons, J and Sonck, B 2008 Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: an on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare 17: 363–373Google Scholar
Roland, DA Sr and Harms, RH 1973 Calcium metabolism in the laying hen. 5. Effect of various sources and sizes of calcium carbonate on shell quality. Poultry Science 52: 369–372. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0520369CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholz, B, Kjaer, JB and Schrader, L 2014 Analysis of landing behav-iour of three layer lines on different perch designs. British Poultry Science 55: 419–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.933175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, ML, Hall, SJ and Mullenhoff, PA 1971 The calcium requirements of laying hens and effects of dietary oyster shell upon egg shell quality. Poultry Science 50: 1055–1063. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.0501055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauson, R and Abrahamsson, P 1994 Foot and skeletal disor-ders in laying hens. Effects of perch design, hybrid, housing system and stocking density. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica. Section A, Animal Science 44: 110–119Google Scholar
Tauson, R, Wahlström, A and Abrahamsson, P 1999 Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health, production, and fear response in layers. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 8:152–159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/japr/8.2.152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G, Ekstrand, C and Svedberg, J 1998 Wet litter and perches as risk factors for the development of foot pad dermati-tis in floor-housed hens. British Poultry Science 39: 191–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071669889114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkins, LJ, Brown, SN, Zimmerman, PH, Leeb, C and Nicol, CJ 2004 Investigation of palpation as a method for determining the prevalence of keel and furculum damage in laying hens. Veterinary Record 155: 547–549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.155.18.547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkins, LJ, McKinstry, JL, Avery, NC, Knowles, TG, Brown, SN, Tarlton, J and Nicol, CJ 2011 Influence of housing system and design on bone strength and keel bone fractures in laying hens. The Veterinary Record 169: 414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.d4831CrossRefGoogle Scholar