Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:52:43.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-term consistency of selected animal-related welfare parameters in dairy farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

C Winckler*
Affiliation:
Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
J Brinkmann
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Animal Production and Technology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Driverstraße 22, D-49377 Vechta, Germany
J Glatz
Affiliation:
Research Centre for Animal Production and Technology, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Driverstraße 22, D-49377 Vechta, Germany
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: christoph.winckler@boku.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It was the purpose of this study to assess the consistency of selected animal-based welfare parameters for dairy cattle throughout a one-year period. Eight cubicle-housed dairy herds were visited five times, at two-monthly intervals. At each visit, lameness, injuries to the carpal and tarsal joints, cleanliness, social behaviour and the avoidance distance towards an unknown person were assessed by the same observer in a random sample.

At herd level, lesions of the carpal joints, udder cleanliness and frequencies of agonistic and cohesive behaviour showed low consistency. However, correlations between consecutive recordings as well as between single visits and the average were moderate to satisfactory for lameness prevalence, lesions of the tarsal joints, cleanliness of the hind leg and avoidance distances towards an unknown person in two different locations. The integration of these parameters into on-farm welfare assessment protocols seems to be justified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Clarkson, MJ, Downham, DY, Faull, WB, Hughes, JW, Manson, FJ, Merritt, JB, Russell, WB, Sutherst, JE and Ward, WR 1996 Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record 138: 563567CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Rosa, G, Tripaldi, C, Napolitano, F, Saltalamacchia, F, Grasso, F, Bisegna, V and Bordi, V 2003 Repeatability of some animal-related variables in dairy cows and buffaloes. Animal Welfare 12: 625629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faye, B and Barnouin, J 1985 Objectivation de la propreté des vaches laitières et des stabulations - l'indice de propreté. Bull Technologie CRZV Theix, INRA 59: 6167. [Title translation: Objective assessment of the cleanliness of dairy cows and barns; cleanliness index]Google Scholar
Rousing, T and Waiblinger, S 2004 Evaluation of on-farm methods for testing the human-animal relationship in dairy herds with cubicle loose housing systems – test-retest and inter-observer reliability and consistency to familiarity of test person. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 85: 215231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, JT, Sandøe, P and Halberg, H 2001 Animal welfare as one among several values to be considered at farm level: The idea of an ethical account for livestock farming. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Supplement 30: 11-17Google Scholar
Waiblinger, S, Menke, C and Fölsch, D 2003 Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84: 2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, B, Schaub, J, Friedli, K and Hauser, R 2000 Behaviour and leg injuries in dairy cows kept in cubicle systems with straw bedding or soft lying mats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 189197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winckler, C, Capdeville, J, Gebresenbet, G, Hörning, B, Roiha, U, Tosi, M and Waiblinger, S 2003 Selection of parameters for on-farm welfare-assessment protocols in cattle and buffalo. Animal Welfare 12: 619624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winckler, C and Willen, S 2001 The reliability and repeatability of a lameness scoring system for use as an indicator of welfare in dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 30: 103107Google Scholar
Winckler, C, Bühnemann, A and Seidel, K 2002 Social behaviour of commercial dairy herds as a parameter for on-farm welfare assessment. In: Koene P (ed) Proceedings of the 36th International Congress of the ISAE pp 86. ISAE: Wageningen, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar