Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:47:26.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meta-analysis — a systematic and quantitative review of animal experiments to maximise the information derived

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

CJC Phillips
CJC Phillips*
Affiliation:
Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland 4343, Australia
*
email: c.phillips@uq.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Meta-analysis provides a tool to statistically aggregate data from existing randomised controlled animal experiments. The results can then be summarised across a range of conditions and an increased pool of experimental data can be subjected to statistical analysis. New information can be derived, but most frequently the results are a refinement of existing knowledge. By designing experiments and reporting protocols, so that they have the capability of being useful to meta-analyses, maximum benefit can be derived from individual randomised controlled experiments, which may individually have little statistical power, and new avenues for productive research identified. The methodology for meta-analysis is derived from clinical trials in the medical sciences. Now that there is substantial output from animal science experiments, there is an opportunity to apply the technique to these and reduce the need for further experimentation. This paper describes the contribution of meta-analysis to the reduction of animals in research and provides details on data collection, analysis, the models used, and on interpreting and reporting the results. Three applications of meta-analysis to the field of animal science are also briefly described. First, the impact of undernutrition on the production and composition of milk from dairy cows confirmed existing knowledge about partitioning scarce nutrients to milk yield and live weight. Second, increased absorption of cadmium — a widespread toxic element — from organic sources was detected in sheep, which was previously untested. Third, no significant relationships were found between common indicators of undernutrition and weight, and condition score in cattle suggesting that the common indicators used are not suitable as evidence of long term undernutrition. This paper concludes that opportunities exist to increase the information gained from animal experiments by subjecting the results to meta-analysis, particularly if this can be anticipated in advance of study protocols being constructed.

Keywords

animal scienceanimal welfareexperimentationmeta-analysisresearch techniquesstatistics
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , November 2005 , pp. 333 - 338
Copyright
© 2005 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Abrams, K and Sanso, B 1998 Approximate Bayesian inference for random effects meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 17: 201–2183.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agenäs, S, Heath, MF, Nixon, RM, Wilkinson, JM and Phillips, CJC 2006 Indicators of long-term under-nutrition in cattle. Animal Welfare 15: in pressGoogle Scholar
Bailey, JD, Ansotegui, RP, Paterson, JA, Swenson, CK and Johnson, AB 2001 Effects of supplementing combinations of organic and complexed copper on performance and liver mineral status of beef heifers consuming antagonists. Journal of Animal Science 79: 2926–2934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benignus, VA 1993 Importance of experimenter-blind procedure in neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 15: 45–49Google ScholarPubMed
Church, RM 2002 The effective use of secondary data. Learning and Motivation 33: 32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J 1988 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
Cole, P, Trichopoulos, D, Pastides, H, Starr, T and Mandel, JS 2003 Dioxin and cancer: a critical review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 38: 378–388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, DJ, Sackett, DL and Spitzer, WO 1995 Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomised control trials in health care from the Potsdam consultation on meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 48: 167–171Google ScholarPubMed
Gram, WK, Sork, VL, Marquis, RJ, Renken, RB, Clawson, RL, Faaborg, J, Fantz, DK, Le Corff, J, Lill, J and Porneluzi, PA 2001 Evaluating the effects of ecosystem management: a case study in a Missouri Ozark forest. Ecological Applications 11: 1667–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennions, MD and Møller, AP 2003 A survey of the statistical power of research in behavioral ecology and animal behavior. Behavioral Ecology 14: 438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moher, D, Cook, DJ, Eastwood, S, Olkin, I, Rennie, D and Stroup, DF 1999 Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. The Lancet 354: 1896–1900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moodie, PF, Nelson, NA and Kock, GG 2004 A non-parametric procedure for evaluating treatment effect in the meta-analysis of survival data. Statistics in Medicine 23: 1075–1093CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munafo, MR, Clark, TG and Flint, J 2004 Assessing publication bias in genetic association studies: evidence from a recent meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research 129: 39–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osburn, HG and Callender, J 1992 A note on the sampling variance of the mean uncorrected correlation in meta-analysis and validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology 77: 115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, CJC 1991 Restriccion de la ingestion de pasto en la vaca lechera. Revision y analisis de resultados publicados. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria 23: 5–20 [Title translation: Restriction of herbage intake in dairy cows, review and analysis of published results]Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC 1998 The use of individual dairy cows as replicates in the statistical analysis of their behaviour at pasture (letter to the editor). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60: 365–369Google Scholar
Phillips, CJC 2002 Further aspects of the use of individual animals as replicates in statistical analysis (letter to the editor). Applied Animal Behavioural Science 75: 265–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, CJC, Chiy, PC and Zachou, E 2005 The effects of cadmium in herbage on the apparent absorption of elements by sheep, in comparison with inorganic cadmium added to their diet. Environmental Research 99: 224–234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prankel, SH, Nixon, RM and Phillips, CJC 2004 Meta-analysis of experiments investigating cadmium accumulation in the liver and kidney of sheep. Environmental Research 94: 171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prankel, SH, Nixon, RM and Phillips, CJC 2005 Implications for the human food chain of models of cadmium accumulation in sheep. Environmental Research 97: 348–358CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez-Meca, J and Marin-Martinez, F 1998 Testing continuous moderators in meta-analysis: a comparison of procedures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 51: 311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuker, DM, Reece, SE, Taylor, JAL and West, SA 2004 Wasp sex ratios when females on a patch are related. Animal Behaviour 68: 331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, SJ, Caudill, SP, Steinberg, KK and Thacker, SB 1995 On combining dose-response data from epidemiological studies by meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 14: 531–544CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, AJ, Duval, SJ, Tweedie, RL, Abrams, KR and Jones, DR 2000 Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. British Medical Journal 320: 1574–1577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, JL 2000 Weighting bias in meta-analysis of binary outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53: 1130–1136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tudoreanu, L and Phillips, CJC 2004 Empirical models of cadmium accumulation in maize, rye grass and soya bean plants. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84: 845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waales, MP, Harvey, MJ and Klaassen, CD 1984 Relative in vitro affinity of hepatic metallothionein for metals. Toxicological Letters 20: 33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, AJF 2002 Has animal science failed society? Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science p 230. British Society of Animal Science: Penicuik, Scotland, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar