Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:47:06.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On-farm welfare assessment systems: what are the recording costs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

JT Sørensen ,
T Rousing ,
SH Møller ,
M Bonde  and
L Hegelund
JT Sørensen*
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health, Welfare, and Nutrition Research Centre Foulum DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
T Rousing
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health, Welfare, and Nutrition Research Centre Foulum DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
SH Møller
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health, Welfare, and Nutrition Research Centre Foulum DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
M Bonde
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health, Welfare, and Nutrition Research Centre Foulum DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
L Hegelund
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Health, Welfare, and Nutrition Research Centre Foulum DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: jantind.Sorensen@agrsci.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To illustrate that different approaches lead to different costs a cost calculation on four different welfare assessment systems for four different animal species has been carried out; an integrated pig herd (450 sows), a dairy cattle herd with automatic milking (90 cows), an organic egg production system (3000 layers) and a mink farm (1000 mink). We calculated the cost to be: €375 per annum for the mink farm and €2205, €2430 and €2435 for the egg production system, the AMS dairy herd and the integrated pig farm, respectively. The costs can be reduced by: reducing the number of indicators and/or the recording frequency, reducing sample sizes, more intensive use of existing data and by exchanging external for internal recordings.

Keywords

animal welfarelabour costson-farm welfare assessment systemsrecordings
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level , May 2007 , pp. 237 - 239
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bonde, MK 2003 Welfare assessment in a commercial sow herd. Development, evaluation and report of the method. DIAS Report 46: 98Google Scholar
Hansen, SW and Møller, SH 2001 The application of a temperament test to on-farm selection of mink. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Supplement 30: 93–98Google Scholar
Hegelund, L, Sørensen, JT and Johansen, NF 2003 Developing a welfare assessment system for commercial organic egg production system. Animal Welfare 12: 649–653Google Scholar
Johnsen, PF, Johannessson, T and Sandøe, P 2001 Assessment of animal welfare at herd level: many goals many methods. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science Supplement 30: 26–33Google Scholar
Møller, SH, Hansen, SW and Sørensen, JT 2003 Assessing animal welfare in a strictly synchronous production: The mink case. Animal Welfare 12: 699–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousing, T, Hindhede, J, Klaas, IC, Bonde, M and Sørensen, JT 2006 Herd individual animal welfare assessment in dairy automatic milking systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture(in press)Google Scholar
Waiblinger, S and Menke, C 2003 Influence of sample size and experimenter on reliability of measures of avoidance distance in dairy cows. Animal Welfare 12: 585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar