Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:46:42.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A preliminary survey on the occurrence of barbering in laboratory mice in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

P Kahnau ,
A Jaap ,
U Hobbiesiefken ,
P Mieske ,
K Diederich ,
C Thöne-Reineke ,
L Lewejohann  and
K Hohlbaum
P Kahnau
Affiliation:
German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
A Jaap
Affiliation:
German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
U Hobbiesiefken
Affiliation:
German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
P Mieske
Affiliation:
German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
K Diederich
Affiliation:
German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
C Thöne-Reineke
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior, and Laboratory Animal Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
L Lewejohann
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior, and Laboratory Animal Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
K Hohlbaum*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Welfare, Animal Behavior, and Laboratory Animal Science, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany German Centre for the Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R), German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
*
* Contact for correspondence: katharina.hohlbaum@bfr.bund.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although barbering is common in laboratory mice (Mus musculus), little is known about its effects, both on animal welfare and the research data collected from barbered mice. To gain information on the occurrence of barbering and related risk factors in animal facilities in Germany, we performed an online survey. All the respondents (n = 32 animal facilities) had experienced barbering in their facility. In most cases, less than 10% of the mice were affected, and the age of onset was mostly observed to be 2 to < 6 months. A greater susceptibility was reported in females and in C57BL/6 mice, but this could not be verified as the prevalence of females and the C57BL/6 strain was unknown. One facility reported differences in barbering between commercial animal suppliers. Barbering was also recorded in mice provided with enrichments, such as houses, wood-gnawing blocks, tunnels, running wheels/discs or cage dividers. None of the responding facilities provided swings, structural elements such as an elevated platform or foraging and cognitive enrichment. The questions of whether barbering may have an impact on study results and whether victims of barbering can be used for experiments revealed mixed opinions, most likely due to a lack of data on potential effects. This survey clearly demonstrated barbering to be a widely underestimated problem that is not given enough attention. We suggest that the occurrence of barbering should be systematically documented in every animal facility and reported in research articles, to provide a greater understanding of barbering and its potential effects.

Keywords

abnormal behaviouranimal welfarebarberinghair-pluckingmicesurvey
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , November 2022 , pp. 433 - 436
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Bechard, A, Meagher, R and Mason, G 2011 Environmental enrichment reduces the likelihood of alopecia in adult C57BL/6J mice. Journal of American Association of Lab Animal Science 50: 171–174Google ScholarPubMed
Dufour, BD and Garner, JP 2010 An ethological analysis of barbering behavior. In: Kalueff, A, La Porte, J and Bergner, C (eds) Neurobiology of Grooming Behavior pp 184–225. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676109.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, JP, Weisker, SM, Dufour, B and Mench, JA 2004 Barbering (fur and whisker trimming) by laboratory mice as a model of human trichotillomania and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders. Comparative Medicine 54: 216–224Google Scholar
Hobbiesiefken, U, Mieske, P, Lewejohann, L and Diederich, K 2021 Evaluation of different types of enrichment - their usage and effect on home cage behavior in female mice. PLoS ONE 16: e0261876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261876CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, SY 1972 Hair-nibbling and whisker-trimming as indicators of social hierarchy in mice. Animal Behaviour 20: 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(72)80167-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moberg, G 2000 Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In: Moberg, G and Mench, G (eds) The Biology of Animal Stress. CABI Publishing: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Percie du Sert, N, Hurst, V, Ahluwalia, A, Alam, S, Avey, MT, Baker, M, Browne, WJ, Clark, A, Cuthill, IC, Dirnagl, U, Emerson, M, Garner, P, Holgate, ST, Howells, DW, Karp, NA, Lazic, SE, Lidster, K, MacCallum, CJ, Macleod, M, Pearl, EJ, Petersen, OH, Rawle, F, Reynolds, P, Rooney, K, Sena, ES, Silberberg, SD, Steckler, T and Würbel, H 2020 The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biology 18: e3000410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X20943823CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reinhardt, V 2005 Hair pulling: a review. Lab Animals 39: 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367705774286448CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarna, JR, Dyck, RH and Whishaw, IQ 2000 The Dalila effect: C57BL6 mice barber whiskers by plucking. Behavioural Brain Research 108: 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00137-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würbel, H 2001 Ideal homes? Housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour. Trends in Neuroscience 24: 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01718-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Kahnua et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 758.6 KB