Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:46:40.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rats Demand Social Contact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

E G Patterson-Kane ,
M Hunt  and
D Harper
E G Patterson-Kane*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Agricultural Science, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: rattitude@angelfire.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is some evidence that rats benefit from social housing and from some forms of environmental enrichment, such as platforms and shelters. It is less clear whether they benefit from more spacious cages. There is a lack of information about the relative benefits of social contact, enrichment and increased space, because existing studies tend to concentrate on only one of these variables at a time. The current experiment used economic demand procedures as a method to compare, on a single scale, qualitatively different environments with a standard home cage. The data indicate that rats show a high demand for social contact, and a low demand for a larger cage or one containing pillars or novel objects. This finding suggests that social housing of laboratory rats should be strongly advocated.

Keywords

animal welfarecagingdemandenrichmentratssocial contact
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , August 2002 , pp. 327 - 332
Copyright
© 2002 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Anzaldo, A J, Harrison, P C, Riskowski, G L, Maghirangi, R-G and Gonyou, H W 1994 Increasing welfare of laboratory rats with the help of spatially enhanced cages. Animal Welfare Information Centre Newsletters 5(3): 1–5Google Scholar
Bantin, G C and Sanders, P D 1989 Animal caging: is bigger necessarily better? Animal Technology 40: 45–54Google Scholar
Bradshaw, A L and Poling, A 1991 Choice by rats for enriched versus standard home cages: plastic pipes, wood platforms, wood chips and paper towels as enrichment items. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior 55: 245–250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, P S, Down, M L and Wyatt, A C 1968 Caging rats for bioassay. Journal of the Institute of Animal Technicians 19: 78–84Google Scholar
Chamove, A S 1989 Environmental enrichment: a review. Animal Technology 40: 155–178Google Scholar
Chmiel, D and Noonan, M 1996 Preference of laboratory rats for potentially enriching stimulus objects. Laboratory Animals 30: 97–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denny, M S 1975 The rat's long term preference for complexity in its environment. Animal Learning and Behavior 3: 245–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatch, A, Wiberg, G S, Balazs, T and Grice, H C 1963 Long-term isolation stress in rats. Science 142: 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J A, Kleist, S and Hutchings, C S 1970 Display and food as reinforcers in the Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 70 (3) Part 1: 351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R N 1969 Social facilitation of locomotion and exploration in rats. British Journal of Psychology 60: 385–388CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hursh, S R 1980 Economics concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 34: 219–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hursh, S R 1984 Behavior economics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 42: 435–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hursh, S R, Raslear, T G, Shurtleff, D, Bauman, R and Simmons, L 1988 A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 50: 419–440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hursh, S R 1991 Behavioral economics of drug self-administration and drug abuse policy. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 45: 377–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R N, DeSisto, M J and Koenig, A B 1972 Social and developmental experience and interspecific aggression in rats. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 79: 237–242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lea, H 1978 The psychology and economics of demand. Psychological Bulletin 85: 441–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, M 1990 The size of rodent cages. In: Guttman, H N (ed) Guidelines for the Well-Being of Rodents in Research pp 19–28. Scientists Center for Animal Welfare: Bethesda, USAGoogle Scholar
Matthews, L R 1994 A new methodology for assessing the behavioural requirements of captive animals. Improving the Well-Being of Animals in their Research Environment. Proceedings of Conference held at the Marriott Hotel, Sydney, October 1993 pp 143–146. ANZCCART: Adelaide, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Matthews, L R and Ladewig, J 1994 Requirements of pigs measured by demand functions. Animal Behavior 47: 713–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, L R, Temple, W, Foster, T M, Walker, J and McAdie, TM 1995 Comparison of the demand for dustbathing substrates by layer hens. In: Rutter, S M, Rushen, J, Randle, J D and Eddison, J C (eds) Proceedings of the 29th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology pp 11–12. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare: Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M and Einon, P 1975 Incentive motivation and behavioral inhibition in socially isolated rats. Physiology and Behavior 15: 405–409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson-Kane, E G, Harper, D and Hunt, M 2001 Cage preferences of laboratory rats. Laboratory Animals 35: 74–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson-Kane, E G, Hunt, M and Harper, D 1999 Behavioural indexes of poor welfare in laboratory rats. The Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 2: 97–110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renner, M J and Rosenzweig, M R 1987 Enriched and Impoverished Environments: Effects on Brain and Behavior. Springer-Verlag: New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, T J 1973 Nesting material as a reinforcer for female mice. Animal Behavior 21: 733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C M 1996 Laboratory mice persist in gaining access to resources: a method of assessing importance of environmental features. Applied Animal Behavior Science 48: 203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C M and Nicol, C J 1995 Reorganisation of behavior in laboratory mice (Mus musculus) with varying cost of access to resources. Animal Behavior 51: 1087–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C M and Nicol, C J 1997 Behavioral demand functions of caged laboratory mice for additional space. Animal Behavior 53: 69–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, C M and Nicol, C J 1998 A demanding task: using economic techniques to assess animal priorities. A reply to Mason et al. Animal Behavior 55: 1079–1081CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syme, L A and Hughes, R N 1972 Social isolation in young rats: effects of cage size on open-field behavior. Psychonomic Science 29: 25–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, P 1997 Use of in-cage shelters by laboratory rats. Animal Welfare 6: 95–103Google Scholar