Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:54:00.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of the humaneness of puntilla as a slaughter method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

G Limon ,
J Guitian  and
NG Gregory
G Limon*
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK
J Guitian
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK
NG Gregory
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: glimon@rvc.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Puntilla is a traditional slaughter method in which a knife is plunged into the back of the neck to sever the spinal cord. The aim is to produce immediate collapse of the animal. Puntilla is not condoned as a stunning method by the World Animal Health Organisation (OIE) because there is concern that the animal could be conscious during and after the neck stab. Nonetheless, it is still used in some developing countries. The effectiveness and humaneness of puntilla followed by neck sticking was examined at two slaughterhouses in Bolivia. Twenty llamas (Lama glama) and 309 cattle were observed during routine puntilla without stunning. The number of neck stabs was recorded, and then brain and spinal functions (rhythmic breathing, palpebral reflex and eyeball rotation) were assessed. In addition, the presence of specific cognitive responses (such as responses to a threat stimulus and noise, as well as to flavours and odours), were also assessed in cattle. Breed, sex, live weight, body condition score and the slaughterman's experience were recorded. Repeat stabbing was needed to penetrate the foramen ovale in 45% of the llamas and two of them attempted to stand following collapse after the initial stab. All llamas showed rhythmic breathing movements at the flank following puntilla and before sticking, and 95% had a positive palpebral reflex at the same time. Twenty-four percent of the cattle needed repeat stabbing. Repeat stabbing was significantly less frequent with experienced slaughtermen, and more frequent in heavyweight animals (> 380 kg). Brain and spinal responses were present in 91% of the cattle following the stabs. When cattle attempted to stand after a neck stab they were more likely to have rhythmic breathing, positive palpebral response and responsiveness to threat, noise and brief air stimulus applied to the face. These findings indicate that it is difficult in practice to penetrate the spinal cord with a single puntilla stab. Some nerve pathways are often functional after the neck stab and therefore it is highly likely that the animals remain conscious in at least some modalities for the next part of the slaughter procedure. The challenge in developing countries, however, is to find a strategy that encourages use of a method which limits suffering whilst being accessible for routine slaughter practice.

Keywords

animal welfareBoliviacattle and llamasdegree of awarenesspuntillaslaughter
Type
Papers
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 21 , Issue S2: Proceedings of the HSA Centenary International Symposium ‘Recent Advances in the Welfare of Livestock at Slaughter’ Historic Dockyard, Portsmouth, UK, 2011 , June 2012 , pp. 3 - 8
Copyright
© 2012 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Cartes-Sanchez, MM 2000 Evaluacion De La Eficiencia En El Uso De La Pistola De Proyectil Retenido Para La Insensibilizar Ganado Bovino En Tres Plantas Faeneadoras De Carne De La Decima Region. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias Instituto de Ciencias y Tecnologia de Carnes: Universidad Austral de Chile. [Title translation: An evaluation of the efficiency of pneumatic captive bolt to desensitise cattle in three slaughterhouses of the tenth region]Google Scholar
de Lahunta, A and Glass, E 2009 Veterinary Neuroanatomy and Clinical Neurology. Saunders Elsevier: ChinaGoogle Scholar
Dembo, JA 1894 In the Jewish Method of Slaughter Compared with Other Methods from the Humanitarian, Hygienic and Economic Point of View. Kergan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co Ltd: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization 2008 Capacity Building to Implement Good Animal Welfare Practices. FAO Expert Meeting. 10 September-3 October 2008, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Ghez, C 1991 The control of movement. In: Kandel, ER, Schwartz, JH and Jessell, TM (eds) Principals of Neural Science pp 531–547. Elsevier: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N 1998 Animal Welfare and Meat Science. CABI Publishing: UKGoogle Scholar
Gregory, N 1989 Slaughtering methods and equipment. Veterinary History 6: 73–84Google ScholarPubMed
Gregory, N, Lee, C and Widdicombe, J 2007 Depth of concussion in cattle shot by penetrating captive bolt. Meat Science 77: 499–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoschouer, EL, Basso, DM and Jakeman, LB 2010 Aberrant sensory responses are dependent on lesion severity after spinal cord contusion injury in mice. Pain 148: 328–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klugman, J 2010 Human Development Report 2010, 20th Anniversary Edition. Published for United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_EN_Complete_reprint.pdf. (Accessed October 2011)Google Scholar
Limon, G, Guitian, J and Gregory, N 2009 A note on the slaughter of llamas in Bolivia by the puntilla method. Meat Science 82: 405–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limon, G, Guitian, J and Gregory, N 2010 An evaluation of humaneness of puntilla in cattle. Meat Science 84: 352–355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, VC and Porter, JD 1998 The distribution of primary afferent terminals from the eyelids of macaque monkeys. Experimental Brain Research 123: 368–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002210050582CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, RA and Berger, AJ 1975 Neuronal regulation of respiration. American Review of Respiratory Disease 111: 206–224Google ScholarPubMed
Nathoo, N, Boodhoo, H, Nadvi, SS, Naidoo, S and Gouws, E 2000 Transcranial brainstem stab injuries: a retrospective analysis of 17 patients. Neurosurgery 47(5): 1117–1123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200011000-00018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nhat, PH 2006 Environmental performance improvement for small and medium-sized slaughterhouses in Vietnam. Environment, Development and Sustainability 8: 251–269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9017-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noga, EJ 2000 Fish Diagnosis and Treatment. Blackwell Publications: UKGoogle Scholar
Osborne, M 2009 Horse slaughter conditions in Mexico explored by Aaep group. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 1(234): 584–585Google Scholar
SENASAG 2005 Manual De Metodos De Sacrificio Y Destruccion De Animales, Productos, Subproductos E Insumos De Uso Veterinario. Trinidad Beni: Bolivia. [Title translation: Manual of methods of slaughter and destruction of animals, products and by-products of veterinary use]Google Scholar
Shore, SE 2005 Multisensory integration in the dorsal cochlear nucleus: unit responses to acoustic and trigeminal ganglion simulation. The European Journal of Neuroscience 21(12): 3334–3348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04142.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidswell, SJ, Blackmore, DK and Newhook, JC 1986 Slaughter methods: electroencephalographic (EEG) studies on spinal cord section, decapitation and gross trauma of the brain in lambs. New Zealand. Veterinary Journal 35: 46–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.1987.35377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations 2008 UNECE Standard on Llama/Alpaca Meat Carcases and Cuts. United Nations Publications pp 38. Sales number E.07.II.E.3. UN: New York and GenovaGoogle Scholar
World Organization for Animal Health 2006 Terrestrial Animal Code: Guidelines for the Slaughter of Animals. Appendix 3.7.5. Meeting of the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Standards Commission. 2-13 October 2006, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar