Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:50:02.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rubber net mesh reduces scale loss during routine handling of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Powell*
Affiliation:
Marine Environmental Research Laboratory, Institute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Machrihanish, Argyll PA28 6PZ, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) are an economically and ecologically important fish species that interact with humans during farming, fishing and research operations. Routine handling in nets exposes fish to mesh and causes scale loss. To promote welfare and experimental refinement, a study was performed in a controlled environment to investigate the effect of net mesh type (rubber-coated or standard knotless, both bag volumes circa 7 l; mesh size: 6 mm) and the number of fish per net (capture density) on scale loss. Up to three large adult salmon (mean weight: 900 g) or 15 small smolts (mean weight: 145 g) were briefly captured in hand-nets during routine immersed-stock movement between tanks. Scales were recovered and counted from transportation containers, to establish a simple and rapid methodology. For both size grades, scale loss was generally proportional to capture density. For large adult salmon, scale loss significantly increased with capture density when knotless mesh was used, however the increase was less marked and not statistically significant for adults handled in rubber mesh. Small smolts also demonstrated significantly reduced scale loss when handled with rubber mesh, which increased gradually with capture density. In contrast, small smolts handled in knotless mesh showed greater scale loss as capture density increased. An overall reduction in scale loss with increased capture density was not shown, although the biomass loading per net used in this study were intentionally low (< 3.5 kg). This method suggests a low-tech and rapid approach to quantitatively compare net types and husbandry techniques and suggests a fundamental but simple improvement to salmonid handling in recreational and commercial operations. However, any correlation to conventional stress assays or behavioural observations remains to be established.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2021 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Alvarez-Rubio, NC, Yunis-Aguiaga, J, Cala-Delgado, DL, Quiroz, VAC, Verri, BLM, Espinoza, FCR and de Moraes, JRE 2020 Influence of hand net mesh type and sex on experimen-tal infection with Aeromonas hydrophila in Brazilian native fish Astyanax altiparanae. Aquaculture Reports 16: 100285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthel, BL, Cooke, SJ, Suski, CD and Philipp, DP 2003 Effects of landing net mesh type on injury and mortality in a fresh-water recreational fishery. Fisheries Research 63: 275282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(03)00059-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIM (Bord Iascaigh Mhara) 2020 Wild salmon quality guide. http://www.bim.ie/media/bim/content/Quality,Guides,Salmon.pdfGoogle Scholar
Brackley, R, Lucas, MC, Thomas, R, Adams, CE and Bean, CW 2018 Comparison of damage to live vs euthanized Atlantic salmon Salmo salar smolts from passage through an Archimedean screw turbine. Journal of Fish Biology 92: 16351644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brydges, NM, Boulcott, P, Ellis, T and Braithwaite, VA 2009 Quantifying stress responses induced by different handling meth-ods in three species of fish. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116:295301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, PA, Broadhurst, MK and Cairns, SC 2008 Mortality and physical damage of angled-and-released dusky flathead Platycephalus fuscus. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 81: 127134. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao01951CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butcher, PA, Broadhurst, MK, Hall, KC, Cullis, BR and Nicoll, RG 2010 Scale loss and mortality in angled-and-released eastern sea garfish (Hyporhamphus australis). ICES Journal of Marine Science 67: 522529. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JB and McCormick, SD 1998 Atlantic salmon smolts are more responsive to an acute handling and confinement stress than parr. Aquaculture 168: 237253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00352-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colotelo, AH and Cooke, SJ 2011 Evaluation of common angling-induced sources of epithelial damage for popular freshwa-ter sport fish using fluorescein. Fisheries Research 109: 217224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2010.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, KV, Reid, AJ, Patterson, DA, Robinson, KA, Chapman, JM, Hinch, SG and Cooke, SJ 2019 A synthesis to understand responses to capture stressors among fish discarded from commercial fisheries and options for mitigating their severi-ty. Fish and Fisheries 20: 2543 https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lestang, P, Griffen, R, Allsop, Q and Grace, BS 2008 Effects of two different landing nets on injuries to the Barramundi Lates calcarifer, an iconic Australian sport fish. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 19111915. https://doi.org/10.1577/M07-171.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO 2020 Salmo salar. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Fisheries and Aquaculture Fact Sheets. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department: Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/fish-ery/species/2929/enGoogle Scholar
Friere, R and Nicol, CJ 2019 A bibliometric analysis of past and emergent trends in animal welfare science. Animal Welfare 28:465485. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.4.465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizeé, TW, Lennox, RJ, Ward, TD, Brownscombe, JW, Chapman, JM, Danylchuk, AJ, Nowell, LB and Cooke, SJ 2018 Influence of landing net mesh type on handling time and tis-sue damage of angled brook trout. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 38: 7683. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, IA, Millidine, KJ, Glover, RS, Jackson, FL, Millar, CP and Fryer, RJ 2019 Development of a large-scale juvenile density model to inform the assessment and management of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations in Scotland. Ecological Indicators 96: 303316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecol-ind.2018.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olaussen, JO 2016 Catch-and-release and angler utility: evidence from an Atlantic salmon recreational fishery. Fisheries Management and Ecology 23: 253263. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, RE, Oppedala, F, Tenningen, M and Vold, A 2012 Physiological response and mortality caused by scale loss in Atlantic herring. Fisheries Research 129-130: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portz, DE, Woodley, CM and Cech, JJ 2006 Stress-associated impacts of short-term holding on fishes. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 16: 125170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-006-9012-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadoul, B and Geffroy, B 2019 Measuring cortisol, the major stress hormone in fishes. Journal of Fish Biology 94: 540555. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13904CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santurnun, E, Broom, DM and Phillips, CJC 2018 A review of factors affecting the welfare of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Animal Welfare 27: 193204. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.27.3.193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sveen, LR, Timmerhaus, G, Krasnov, A, Takle, H, Handeland, S and Ytteborg, E 2019 Wound healing in post-smolt Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L). Scientific Reports 9: 3565. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39080-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svendsen, YS and Bøgwald, J 1997 Influence of artificial wound and non-intact mucus layer on mortality of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L) following a bath challenge with Vibrio anguillarum and Aeromonas salmonicida. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 7: 317325. https://doi.org/10.1006/fsim.1997.0087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, SS, Verstockt, S and Ampe, S 2020 Digital image analysis of flatfish bleeding injury. Fisheries Research 224: 105470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veneranta, L, Pakarinen, T, Jokikokko, E, Kallio-Nyberg, I and Harjunpaa, H 2018 Mortality of Baltic sea trout (Salmo trut-ta) after release from gillnets. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 34: 4957. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zydlewski, J, Zydlewski, G and Danner, GR 2010 Descaling injury impairs the osmoregulatory ability of Atlantic salmon smolts entering seawater. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139: 129136. https://doi.org/10.1577/T09-054.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar