Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:00:34.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successful Group Housing of Wild-Caught Brushtail Possums (Trichosurus Vulpecula)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

B J McLeod ,
E G Thompson ,
J L Crawford  and
G H Shackell
B J McLeod*
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
E G Thompson
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
J L Crawford
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
G H Shackell
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
*
† Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula), introduced from Australia about 150 years ago, has become a major pest threatening the native biota of New Zealand. It is also an important disease vector, acting as a wildlife reservoir of infection. Conventional methods of control have had little effect on reducing the national population, so there is a quest to find more effective and humane methods. This has led to an upsurge in research aimed at increasing our knowledge of the biology of this marsupial, with an attendant increase in requirements for access to colony-housed animals.

Possums kept for research purposes have often been housed in individual cages, and several colonies have experienced high mortality rates. After capture, possums have shown inappetence, weight loss and a predisposition to infection, suggesting that this species is susceptible to post-capture stress. For our reproductive studies, research animals are only useful if maintained under conditions that ensure behavioural and physiological processes remain normal. We have adopted an ‘animal husbandry’ approach for our possum colony, where social interaction and the ability to exhibit instinctive behaviour patterns are considered as important as adequate nutrition and housing.

In this colony, group-housed possums show no signs of post-capture stress, and mortality rate has been less than one per cent (of > 600 animals housed to date). Virtually all possums gain weight over the first month of captivity. Procedures for monitoring, handling and the collection of data from these animals, are carried out with little apparent stress to either animals or staff.

Keywords

animal welfarebrushtail possumgroup housingsocial well-beingstress
Type
Technical Contribution
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 67 - 76
Copyright
© 1997 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Amendment 1987 The Animals Protection Act 1960. Amendment to the Animals Protection Act ‘Codes of Ethical Conduct’ 1987. Government Printer: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Biggins, J G 1984 Communication in possums: a review. In: Smith, A and Hume, I (eds) Possums and Gliders pp 35–57. Surrey Beatty: Chipping Norton, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Broom, D M and Johnson, K G 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K, Innes, J and Shorten, R 1993 Evidence that possums prey on and scavenge birds’ eggs, birds and mammals. Notornis 40: 169–177Google Scholar
Buddie, B M, Aldwell, E E, Jowett, G, Thomson, A, Jackson, R and Paterson, B M 1992 Influence of stress of capture on haematological values and cellular immune responses in the Australian brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). New Zealand Veterinary Journal 40: 155–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, J J 1980 Endocrine factors in population regulation. In: Cohen, M N, Malpass, R S and Klein, H G (eds) Biosocial Mechanisms of Population Regulation pp 5–115. Yale University Press: New Haven, USAGoogle Scholar
Cowan, P E 1990a Brushtail possum. In: King, C M (ed) The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals pp 68–98. Oxford University Press: Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Cowan, P E 1990b Fruits, seeds and flowers in the diet of the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in lowland podocarp/mixed hardwood forest, Orongorongo Valley, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 17: 549–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekdahl, M O, Smith, B L and Money, DFL 1970 Tuberculosis in some wild and feral animals in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 18: 44–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairweather, A A C, Brockie, R E and Ward, G D 1987 Possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) sharing dens: a potential infection route for bovine tuberculosis. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 35: 15–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, A E 1976 Diet of the opossum (Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr) in the Orongaronga Valley, Wellington, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 3: 399–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, K W 1979 Dynamics and condition of the opossum (Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr) populations in the Copland Valley, Westland, New Zealand. Mauri Ora 7: 117–137Google Scholar
Gilmore, D P 1967 Foods of the Australian opossum (Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr) on Banks Peninsula, Canterbury, and a comparison with other selected areas. New Zealand Journal of Science 10: 235–279Google Scholar
Green, W Q and Coleman, J D 1984 Response of a brush-tailed possum population to intensive trapping. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 11: 319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W Q and Coleman, J D 1986 Movement of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) between forest and pasture in Westland, New Zealand: implications for bovine tuberculosis transmission. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 9: 57–69Google Scholar
Green, W Q and Coleman, J D 1987 Den sites of possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) and frequency of use in mixed hardwood forest in Westland, New Zealand. Australian Wildlife Research 14: 285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J F T 1989 Stress and immunity: a unifying concept. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 20: 263–312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, R 1977 Animals in Factory Farms. Information Report 26: 1. Animal Welfare Institute: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Hartford, B (ed) 1994 Possum Management in New Zealand. Parliamentary Report, Commissioner for the Environment: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, S C, Blackmore, D K and Marshall, R B 1978 The serologic and cultural prevalence of Leptospira interrogans serovar balcanica in possums Trichosurus vulpecula in New Zealand. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 14: 345–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hope, R M 1971 The maintenance of the brush-tailed possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in captivity. International Zoo Yearbook 11: 24–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, S E 1993 Biological control of possums. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 2: 335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, S E, Scobie, S and Coleman, M C 1995 Breeding capacity of female brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in captivity. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 22: 325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, R 1978 The application of animal behaviour and the humane care of farm animals. Journal of Animal Science 46: 1478–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leathwick, J R, Hay, J R and Fitzgerald, A E 1983 The influence of browsing by introduced animals on the decline of the North Island Kokako. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 6: 55–70Google Scholar
Little, E C S and Cowan, P E 1992 Natural immigration of brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, into Aroha Island, Kerikeri Inlet, Bay of Islands, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 19: 53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, P G 1991 Tuberculosis in New Zealand - current status and control policies. Surveillance 19: 14–18Google Scholar
Mackintosh, C G, Crawford, J L, Thompson, E G, McLeod, B J, Gill, J S and O’Keefe, J S 1995 A newly discovered disease of the brushtail possum: wobbly possum syndrome. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 43: 126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLennan, D G 1984 The feeding behaviour and activity patterns of the brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in an open eucalypt woodland in southeast Queensland. In: Smith, A and Hume, I (eds) Possums and Gliders pp 155–161. Surrey Beatty: Chipping Norton, Australia.Google Scholar
Morgan, D A and Peters, J A 1982 Possums in captivity. What’s New in Forest Research 108: 1–4Google Scholar
O’Donnell, C F J 1994 Possums as Conservation Pests. Proceedings of a Workshop on Possums as Conservation Pests. Department of Conservation: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Peters, A J 1979 Possums in captivity. In: Goldsmidt, M (ed) Opossum Field Day pp 15–21. Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Rangiora, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Pracy, L T 1974 Introduction and Liberation of the Opossum (Trichosurus vulpecula) into New Zealand. New Zealand Forest Service Information Series No 45: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Presidente, P J A 1984 Parasites and diseases of brushtail possums (Trichosurus spp): occurrence and significance. In: Smith, A and Hume, I (eds) Possums and Gliders pp 171–187. Surrey Beatty: Chipping Norton, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Presidente, P J A and Correa, J 1981 Haematology, plasma electrolytes and serum biochemical values of Trichosurus vulpecula (Kerr) (Marsupialia: Phalangeridae). Australian Journal of Zoology 29: 507–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollin, B E 1992 Moral theory and animals. In: Animal Rights and Human Morality pp 19–107. Prometheus Books: Buffalo, USAGoogle Scholar
Triggs, S J 1982 Comparative Ecology of the Possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) in Three Pastoral Habitats. MSc Thesis, University of Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, C H 1994 Virus-vectored immunocontraception of feral mammals. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 6: 281–287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, J W 1976 The Behaviour and Social Organisation of the Brush-Tailed Possum (Trichosurus vulpecula Kerr). PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar