Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:16:58.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tools to measure and improve animal welfare: Reward-related behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

JE Van der Harst  and
BM Spruijt
JE Van der Harst*
Affiliation:
Department of Animals, Science and Society, Ethology and Welfare Group, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.166, NL-3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands
BM Spruijt
Affiliation:
Department of Animals, Science and Society, Ethology and Welfare Group, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.166, NL-3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
* Correspondence: j.e.vanderharst@vet.uu.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is an increasing requirement for tools to assess and improve animal welfare in an objective and scientifically based manner. In our research a concept of welfare is applied which states that welfare is determined by the balance between positive and negative experiences. This concept implies that an interaction exists between stress systems and reward systems in the brain and, as a consequence: (I) negative experiences induce an increased sensitivity (ie need) for positive experiences; and (II) negative experiences can be compensated for by positive experiences. On this basis, two uses of reward-related behaviour can be hypothesised: (I) reward sensitivity may be used as a tool to assess the state of an animal in terms of welfare because it can indicate the current state of the balance that is dependent on previous (stressful) experiences; and (II) regular presentation of rewards may serve as a tool to counteract stress by shifting the balance to the positive side and, thus, to improve welfare. In order to investigate this, we used the rat as a model. Reward sensitivity was determined by the spontaneous behavioural response shown during expectation of a reward (ie anticipatory behaviour). A third (III) use of reward-related behaviour derives from the fact that anticipatory behaviour is influenced by the (rewarding) properties of the forthcoming reward (or other event) and, thus, may serve as a tool to assess the animal's perception of this reward/event. This paper presents a descriptive overview of the evidence obtained thus far for the three proposed uses of reward-related behaviour. The biological background of our concept of welfare can be generalised to all (vertebrate) species, and anticipatory behaviour can be evoked in a wide range of other species. Therefore, this tool for measuring and improving the welfare of captive animals has great potential and will contribute to a good quality of life for captive animals.

Keywords

animal welfareanticipatory behaviourbehavioural therapyneuro-ethologyrewardwelfare indicator
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 16 , Issue S1: Quality of Life: the heart of the matter: Proceedings of the UFAW/BVA Ethics Committee International Symposium, The Royal Society, London, 13-14 September 2006. , May 2007 , pp. 67 - 73
Copyright
© 2007 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Agmo, A and Berenfeld, R 1990 Reinforcing properties of ejaculation in the male rat: role of opioids and dopamine. Behavioural Neuroscience 104: 177–189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association 1994 DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th Edition). American Psychiatric Association: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Badihi, I and Buchanan-Smith, HM 2007 Anticipatory behaviour — a means of determining the significance of positive and negative events? (Poster presentation.) Animal Welfare 16 (S): 165Google Scholar
Berridge, KC 1996 Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 20: 1–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertiere, MC, Sy, TM, Baigts, F, Mandenoff, A and Apfelbaum, M 1984 Stress and sucrose hyperphagia: role of endogenous opiates. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 20: 675–679CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, JR, Phillips, AG, Jakubovic, A and Fibiger, HC 1989 Dopamine and preparatory behavior. II: A neurochemical analysis. Behavioural Neuroscience 103: 15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabanac, M 1971 Physiological role of pleasure. Science 173: 1103–1107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabanac, M 1992 Pleasure: the common currency. Journal of Theoretical Biology 155: 173–200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabib, S and Puglisi-Allegra, S 1996 Stress, depression and the mesolimbic dopamine system. Psychopharmacology 128: 331–342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, JD and Blum, KI 2002 Reward and decision. Neuron 36: 193–198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, W 1918 Appetites and aversions as constituents of instincts. Biological Bulletin 34: 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Aquila, PS, Collu, M, Gessa, GL and Serra, G 2000 The role of dopamine in the mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs. European Journal of Pharmacology 405: 365–373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudink, S, Simonse, H, Marks, I, de Jonge, FH and Spruijt, BM 2006 Announcing the arrival of enrichment increases play behaviour and reduces weaning-stress-induced behaviours of piglets directly after weaning. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 101: 86–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, FS 1998 Social deprivation of neonatal, adolescent, and adult rats has distinct neurochemical and behavioral consequences. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology 12: 129–162CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, GH, Marsden, CA and Robbins, TW 1990 Increased sensitivity to amphetamine and reward-related stimuli following social isolation in rats: possible disruption of dopamine-dependent mechanisms. Psychopharmacology 102: 364–372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalivas, PW and Nakamura, M 1999 Neural systems for behavioral activation and reward. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9: 223–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koob, GF 1996 Hedonic valence, dopamine and motivation. Molecular Psychiatry 1: 186–189Google ScholarPubMed
Matthews, K, Wilkinson, LS and Robbins, TW 1996 Repeated maternal separation of preweanling rats attenuates behavioral responses to primary and conditioned incentives in adulthood. Physiology & Behavior 59: 99–107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McEwen, BS and Magarinos, A 2001 Stress and hippocampal plasticity: implications for the pathophysiology of affective disorders. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental 16: 7–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moe, RO, Bakken, M, Kittilsen, S, Kingsley-Smith, H and Spruijt, BM 2006 A note on reward-related behaviour and emotional expressions in farmed silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes): basis for a novel tool to study animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101: 362–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, MJ and Einon, D 1975 Incentive motivation and behavioural inhibition in socially isolated rats. Physiology & Behavior 15: 405–409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Doherty, JP, Deichmann, R, Critchley, HD and Dolan, RJ 2002 Neural responses during anticipation of a primary taste reward. Neuron 33: 815–826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlides, C, Nivon, LG and McEwen, BS 2002 Effects of chronic stress on hippocampal long-term potentiation. Hippocampus 12: 245–257CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaus, JG and Phillips, AG 1991 Role of dopamine in anticipatory and consummatory aspects of sexual behaviour in the male rat. Behavioural Neuroscience 105: 727–743CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfaus, JG, Kippin, TE and Centeno, S 2001 Conditioning and sexual behavior: a review. Hormones and Behavior 40: 291–321CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piazza, PV, Deminiere, JM, Le Moal, M and Simon, H 1990 Stress- and pharmacologically-induced behavioural sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration. Brain Research 514: 22–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, T 1992 The nature and evolution of behavioural needs in mammals. Animal Welfare 1: 203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, NR and Gratton, A 1996 Behavior-relevant changes in nucleus accumbens dopamine transmission elicited by food-reinforcement: an electrochemical study in rat. Journal of Neuroscience 16: 8160–8169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, W, Dayan, P and Montague, PR 1997 A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275: 1593–1599CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shakesby, AC, Anwyl, R and Rowan, MJ 2002 Overcoming the effects of stress on synaptic plasticity in the intact hippocampus: rapid actions of serotonergic and antidepressant agents. Journal of Neuroscience 22: 3638–3644CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spruijt, BM 2001 How the hierarchical organization of the brain and increasing cognitive abilities may result in consciousness. Animal Welfare 10: S77–S87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruijt, BM, Van den Bos, R and Pijlman, FT 2001 A concept of welfare based on reward evaluating mechanisms in the brain: anticipatory behaviour as an indicator for the state of reward systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72: 145–171CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Berg, CL, Pijlman, FT, Koning, HA, Diergaarde, L, Van Ree, JM and Spruijt, BM 1999 Isolation changes the incentive value of sucrose and social behaviour in juvenile and adult rats. Behavioural Brain Research 106: 133–142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Bos, R, Meijer, MK, Van Renselaar, JP, Van der Harst, JE and Spruijt, BM 2003 Anticipation is differentially expressed in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and domestic cats (Felis silvestris cattus) in the same classic conditioning paradigm. Behavioural Brain Research 141: 83–98Google Scholar
Van der Harst, JE 2003 Tools to measure and improve welfare of laboratory rats: reward-related behaviour and environmental enrichment. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Van der Harst, JE, Baars, JM and Spruijt, BM 2003a Standard housed rats are more sensitive to rewards than enriched housed rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Behavioural Brain Research 142: 151–156Google ScholarPubMed
Van der Harst, JE, Fermont, PCJ, Bilstra, AE and Spruijt, BM 2003b Access to enriched housing is rewarding to rats as reflected by their anticipatory behaviour. Animal Behaviour 66: 493–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Harst, JE, Baars, JM and Spruijt, BM 2005 Announced rewards counteract the impairment of anticipatory behaviour in socially stressed rats. Behavioural Brain Research 161: 183–189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dierendonck, MC 2006 The importance of social relationships in horses. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Van Furth, WR, Wolterink, G and Van Ree, JM 1995 Regulation of masculine sexual behavior: involvement of brain opioids and dopamine. Brain Research, Brain Research Reviews 21: 162–184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vinke, CM, Van den Bos, R and Spruijt, BM 2004 Anticipatory activity and stereotypical behaviour in American mink (Mustela vison) in three housing systems differing in the amount of enrichments. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 89: 145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Frijtag, JC 2001 Long-term effects of social stress in rats: the assessment of animal welfare using a model of human depression. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Von Frijtag, JC, Kamal, A, Reijmers, LG, Schrama, LH, Van den Bos, R and Spruijt, BM 2001 Chronic imipramine treatment partially reverses the long-term changes of hippocampal synaptic plasticity in socially stressed rats. Neuroscience Letters 309: 153–156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Frijtag, JC, Reijmers, LGJE, Van der Harst, JE, Leus, IE, Van den Bos, R and Spruijt, BM 2000 Defeat followed by individual housing results in long-term impaired reward- and cognition-related behaviours in rats. Behavioural Brain Research 117: 137–146Google ScholarPubMed
Von Frijtag, JC, Van den Bos, R and Spruijt, BM 2002 Imipramine restores the long-term impairment of appetitive behavior in socially stressed rats. Psychopharmacology 162: 232–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zacharko, RM and Anisman, H 1991 Stressor-induced anhedonia in the mesocorticolimbic system. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 15: 391–405CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed