Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:07:14.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Welfare Implications of Shepherding During Lambing in Extensive New Zealand Farming Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

M W Fisher  and
D J Mellor
M W Fisher*
Affiliation:
AgResearch Poukawa, PO Box 8144, Havelock North, New Zealand
D J Mellor
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, Institute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: mark.fisher@agresearch.co.nz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A review of the literature was undertaken to consider the possible effects of human intervention (shepherding) at around the time of parturition in extensively farmed sheep. There is little clear empirical evidence to suggest that shepherding ensures either easy births or the integrity of ewe–lamb contact — factors closely linked to the welfare of the animals at this time. There is similarly no clear support for shepherding being harmful. However, the following suggestions are made: first, human presence can inhibit or delay parturition; second, extended parturition can increase the risk of, or is associated with, dystocia; and third, disturbance at birth can compromise ewe-lamb bonding and consequently lamb survival. Furthermore, sheep populations that have undergone rigorous selection for ease of lambing and minimal shepherding in extensive environments have well-documented physical and behavioural traits underlying their predisposition for enhanced lamb survival. Although our cultural legacy may impose a duty to intensively monitor animals at lambing, it is concluded that, at least in some situations, shepherding may not be entirely beneficial. The commonly held view of the necessity for some human intervention in extensive livestock systems is perhaps overly paternalistic, and requires a more comprehensive appraisal.

Keywords

animal welfaredisturbanceeasy-carelambingsheepshepherd
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , May 2002 , pp. 157 - 170
Copyright
© 2002 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Ainsworth, L, Fiser, P S, Heaney, D P, Langford, G A and Shrestha, J N B 1985 Intensive husbandry of fecund sheep. In: Land, R B and Robinson, D W (eds) Genetics of Reproduction in Sheep pp 399–409. Butterworths: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G 1960 Maternal behaviour in the Merino ewe. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 3: 105–114Google Scholar
Alexander, G 1980 Husbandry practices in relation to maternal-offspring behaviour. In: Wodzicka-Tomaszewska, M, Edey, T N and Lynch, J J (eds) Behaviour — Reviews in Rural Science, Behaviour in Relation to Reproduction, Management and Welfare of Farm Animals 4 pp 99–107. University of New England Press: Annidale, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G 1984 Constraints to lamb survival. In: Lindsay, D R and Pearse, D T (eds) Reproduction in Sheep pp 199–209. Australian Academy of Science and Australian Wool Corporation: Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G, Stevens, D and Lynch, J J 1980 Inadequate maternal care: a factor contributing to the differential mortality of singles and twins in fine-woolled Merino sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13: 496Google Scholar
Alexander, G, Stevens, D, Kilgour, R, de Langen, H, Mottershead, B E and Lynch, J J 1983a Separation of ewes from twin lambs: incidence in several sheep breeds. Applied Animal Ethology 10: 301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G, Stevens, D and Mottershead, B 1983b Problems in the accurate recording of lambing data. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 23: 361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G, Kilgour, R, Stevens, D and Bradley, L R 1984 The effect of experience on twin-care in New Zealand Romney sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 12: 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G, Poindron, P, Le Neindre, P, Stevens, D, Levy, F and Bradley, L 1986 Importance of the first hour post-partum for exclusive maternal bonding in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G, Stevens, D and Bradley, L R 1990 Distribution of field birth-sites of lambing ewes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30: 759–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G, Stevens, D, Baker, P and Bradley, L R 1993 The timing of birth in grazing Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 33: 557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, A J 1982 Techniques of modifying reproductive performance. In: Wickham, G A and McDonald, M F (eds) Sheep Production — Volume One: Breeding and Reproduction pp 239–263. New Zealand Institute of Agricultural Science and Ray Richards: Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Arnold, G W and Dudzinski, M L 1978 Ethology of Free-Ranging Domestic Animals. Elsevier Scientific: Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Arnold, G W and Morgan, P D 1975 Behaviour of the ewe and lamb at lambing and its relationship to lamb mortality. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bontekoe, EHM, Blacquière, J F, Naaktgeboren, C, Dieleman, S J and Willems, PPM 1977 Influence of environmental disturbances on uterine motility during pregnancy and parturition in rabbit and sheep. Behavioural Processes 2: 41–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, A R and Wodzicka-Tomaszewska, M 1974 Perinatal behaviour and progesterone and corticosteroid levels in sheep. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 10: 318–321Google Scholar
Broom, D M and Johnson, K G 1993 Stress and Animal Welfare. Chapman & Hall: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, A M, Tate, M L, McEwan, J C, Kumaramanickavel, G, McEwan, K M, Dodds, K G, Swarbrick, P A and Thompson, P 1993 How reliable are sheep pedigrees? Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 53: 363–366Google Scholar
D'Alessio, V 1993 Spoil the mother, spare the child. New Scientist (28 August): 3Google Scholar
Dalton, D C, Knight, T W and Johnson, D L 1980 Lamb survival in sheep breeds on New Zealand hill country. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23: 167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducker, M J and Fraser, J 1973 A note on the effect of level of husbandry at lambing on lamb viability and subsequent performance. Animal Production 16: 91–94Google Scholar
Duffy, J H 1981 The influence of various degrees of confinement and supervision on the incidence of dystokia and stillbirths in Hereford heifers. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 29: 44–48Google Scholar
Dwyer, C M, Lawrence, A B, Brown, H E and Simm, G 1996 Effect of ewe and lamb genotype on gestation length, lambing ease and neonatal behaviour of lambs. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 8: 1123–1129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eales, F A, Small, J and Gilmour, J S 1983 Neonatal mortality of lambs and its causes. In: Haresign, W (ed) Sheep Production pp 289–298. Butterworths: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Fell, H R 1967 Housing the ewe flock. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 128: 38–45Google Scholar
Fisher, M W 2002 New Zealand farmer narratives of the benefits of reduced human intervention during lambing in extensive farming systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics: in pressGoogle Scholar
Gates, N L 1977 Observations on lamb mortality at the US Sheep Experiment Station. Western Veterinarian 15: 5–7Google Scholar
Geenty, K G 1997 A Guide to Improved Lambing Percentage for Farmers and Advisors. Wools of New Zealand and The New Zealand Meat Producers Board: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Geist, V 1971 Mountain Sheep. A Study in Behavior and Evolution. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, USAGoogle Scholar
Giles, J R 1968a Reducing lamb losses by drift lambing. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 15: 96–97Google Scholar
Giles, J R 1968b A comparison of two lambing management systems. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 7: 235–238Google Scholar
Grubb, P and Jewell, P A 1966 Social grouping and home range in feral Soay sheep. Symposia Zoological Society of London 18: 179–210Google Scholar
Gumbrell, R C 1985 Perinatal mortality in lambs: a 5 year survey. Surveillance 12: 5–7Google Scholar
Haughey, K G 1980 The effect of birth injury to the foetal nervous system on the survival and feeding behaviour of lambs. Reviews in Rural Science 4: 109–111Google Scholar
Haughey, K G 1983 Selective breeding for rearing ability as an aid to improving lamb survival. Australian Veterinary Journal 60: 361–363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hight, G 1978/1979 Sheep selection experiment. In: Agricultural Research Division Annual Report pp 134–136. New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Hight, G K and Jury, K E 1970 Hill country sheep production. II. Lamb mortality and birth weights in Romney and Border Leicester X Romney flocks. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 13: 735–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinch, G N, Crosbie, S F, Kelly, R W, Owens, J L and Davis, G H 1985 Influence of birth weight and litter size on lamb survival in high fecundity Booroola-Merino crossbred flocks. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 28: 31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudgens, R E, Albright, J L and Pennington, J A 1986 Influence of feeding time and diet on time of parturition in multiparous ewes. Journal of Animal Science 63: 1036–1040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, A L 1976 Lambing supervision — a fine balance. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 47(3): 192Google Scholar
Kilgour, R 1972 Behaviour of sheep at lambing. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 125(3): 24–27Google Scholar
Kilgour, R 1982 Better lambing procedures. Proceedings of the Ruakura Farmers Conference pp 9–13. Farm Advisory Division, Department of Agriculture: Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, R and Dalton, C 1984 Livestock Behaviour. A Practical Guide. Granada: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, R and de Langen, H 1980 Neonatal behaviour in “easy-care” sheep. In: Wodzicka-Tomaszewka M, Edey T N and Lynch J J (eds) Behaviour — Reviews in Rural Science, Behaviour in Relation to Reproduction, Management and Welfare of Farm Animals 4: 117–118. University of New England Press: Armidale, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, R, de Langen, H and Bremner, K 1976 Behaviour at lambing of Romney ewes with exotic breed lambs: an interim report. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 36: 258–260Google Scholar
Kilgour, R, Alexander, G and Stevens, D 1983 A field study of factors interrupting bonding of ewes and twins. Proceedings of the Second Asia-Oceania Congress of Perinatology 2: 118–123Google Scholar
Knight, T W, Lynch, P R, Hall, D R H and Hockey, H-U P 1988 Identification of factors contributing to the improved lamb survival in Marshall Romney sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 31: 259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, T W, Wilson, L D, Lynch, P R and Hockey, H-U P 1989a Slope and the choice of birth sites by ewes. New Zealand Journal Agricultural Research 32: 193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, T W, McMillan, W H, Kilgour, R, Hockey, H-U P and Hall, D R H 1989b Effect of slope of lambing site on lambs slipping and lamb mortality. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 32: 199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lederman, R P, Lederman, E, Work, B A and McCann, D S 1978 The relationship of maternal anxiety, plasma catecholamines, and plasma Cortisol to progress in labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 132: 495–500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackereth, V 1979 How “Marshall” Romneys began. New Zealand Farmer 100(1): 24–26Google Scholar
McSporran, K D and Fielden, E D 1979 Studies on dystocia in sheep. II Pelvic measurements of ewes with histories of dystocia and eutocia. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 27: 75–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, D J 1988 Integration of perinatal events, pathophysiological changes and consequences for the newborn lamb. British Veterinary Journal 144: 552–569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Midgley, M 1992 Science as Salvation. A Modern Myth and its Meaning. Routledge: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Midgley, M 1994 The Ethical Primate. Humans, Freedom and Morality. Routledge: London, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R W, Donald, I M and Messenger, J J 1966 Fox prédation as a cause of lamb mortality. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 6: 157–160Google Scholar
Murphy, P M, Lindsay, D R and Purvis, I W 1994 The importance of the birth site on the survival of Merino lambs. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 20: 251 -254Google Scholar
Naaktgeboren, C 1974 Myometrial activity and its exploration by electromyography of uterine smooth muscle. Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtüng und Züchtungsbiologie 91: 278–296Google ScholarPubMed
Naaktgeboren, C 1979 Behavioural aspects of parturition. Animal Reproduction Science 2: 155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naaktgeboren, C and Bontekoe, E H M 1976 Vergleichend-geburtskundliche betrachtungen und experimentelle Untersuchungen über pyschosomatische Störungen der Schwangerschaft und des geburtsablaufes. Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtüng und Züchtungsbiologie 93: 264–320 [Title translation: Comparative-obstetrical views and experimental studies on psychosomatic disorders during pregnancy and parturition]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoll, G B, Dodds, K G and Alderton, M J 1999 Field data analysis of lamb survival and mortality rates occurring between pregnancy scanning and weaning. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 59: 98–100Google Scholar
Nowak, R 1996 Neonatal survival: contributions from behavioural studies in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 61 -72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Numan, M 1988 Maternal behaviour. In: Knobil, E and Neill, J (eds) The Physiology of Reproduction pp 1569–1645. Raven Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, C E, Jay, N P, Nicol, A M and Beatson, P R 1985 Ewe maternal behaviour score and lamb survival. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 45: 159–162Google Scholar
Poindron, P and Le Neindre, P 1980 Endocrine and sensory regulation of maternal behavior in the ewe. In: Rosenblatt, J S, Hinde, R A, Beer, C and Busnel, M C (eds) Advances in the Study of Behaviour, Volume II pp 75–119. Academic Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Pollard, J C 1989 The effects of litter size on the behaviour of ewes and lambs. PhD Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
Protsch, R and Berger, R 1973 Earliest radiocarbon dates for domesticated animals. Science 179: 235–239CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putu, I G, Poindron, P, Oldham, C M, Gray, S J and Ballard, M 1986 Lamb desertion in primiparous and multiparous Merino ewes induced to lamb with dexamethasone. Proceedings of the Australian Society Animal Production 16: 315–318Google Scholar
Putu, I G, Poindron, P and Lindsay, D R 1988 Early disturbance of Merino ewes from the birth site increases lamb separation and mortality. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 17: 298–301Google Scholar
Scales, G H, Burton, R N and Moss, R A 1986 Lamb mortality, birthweight, and nutrition in late pregnancy. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 29: 75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelley, L 1970 Interrelationships between the duration of parturition, post-natal behaviour of ewes and lambs and the incidence of neonatal mortality. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 8: 348–352Google Scholar
Shillito, E E and Hoyland, V J 1971 Observations on parturition and maternal care in Soay sheep. Journal of Zoology, London 165: 509–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F V, Van-Toller, C and Boyes, T 1966 The ‘critical period’ in the attachment of lambs and ewes. Animal Behaviour 14: 120–125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, D, Alexander, G and Lynch, J J 1982 Lamb mortality due to inadequate care of twins by Merino ewes. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrrell, R N and Giles, J R 1974 Lamb mortality under three lambing systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 14: 600–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, L R 1949 Observations of lambing behaviour in ewes. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 9: 85–96Google Scholar
Waterhouse, A 1996 Animal welfare and sustainability of production under extensive conditions — a European perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49: 29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J 1994 Animal Welfare. A Cool Eye Towards Eden. Blackwell Science: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Welch, RAS and Kilgour, R 1970 Mis-mothering among Romneys. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture 121(4): 26–27Google Scholar
Whateley, J, Kilgour, R and Dalton, D C 1974 Behaviour of hill country sheep breeds during farming routines. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 34: 28–36Google Scholar
Winfield, C G 1970 The effect of stocking intensity at lambing on lamb survival and ewe and lamb behaviour. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 8: 291 -296Google Scholar
Winfield, C G and Kilgour, R 1976 A study of following behaviour in young lambs. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, C G, Williams, A H and Makin, A W 1972 Some factors associated with the periparturient behaviour of ewes and lambs indoors. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9: 365–370Google Scholar
Zeuner, F E 1963 A History of Domesticated Animals. Hutchinson: London, UKGoogle Scholar