Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:29:53.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The welfare of ducks during foie gras production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

I Rochlitz  and
DM Broom
I Rochlitz*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Information Service, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK
DM Broom
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Information Service, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ES, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: ir10000@cantab.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This review, which focuses on foie gras production from ducks in France, highlights welfare problems that may arise in the final (third) stage of production, when force-feeding occurs and which lasts 12 to 15 days. Welfare problems arising in the first two stages are also considered. The male mulard duck, a non-migratory hybrid between a muscovy drake (Cairina moschata) and a female domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos), is used most frequently despite being fearful, nervous and maladapted to force-feeding conditions. During the period of force-feeding, mortality is 2 to 6%, higher than in fattening units for meat production. Welfare deteriorates markedly as ducks progress through the three production stages. Posture and gait abnormalities and wing lesions develop, and contact dermatitis is widespread and often severe. Oesophagitis and other injuries are documented. Steatosis and other liver changes are pathological and can limit duck survival. Group housing necessitates the use of crowd-gates to facilitate force-feeding of birds, which show aversive behaviour towards the force-feeder. Cages are small, with a mesh floor without litter or a rest area. Access to open water for bathing or full immersion of the head may be insufficient and make thermoregulation difficult. We conclude that forcefeeding causes very poor welfare in ducks and should not be practised. Should foie gras production without force-feeding become possible, duck livers should not reach a weight at which there are pathological effects. Inadequate housing and management conditions should be prevented by establishing limits for the prevalences of contact dermatitis (foot-pad and digits), breast lesions and gait abnormalities, which should not be exceeded prior to slaughter. Limits should also be established for the prevalence of wing and other body lesions after slaughter.

Keywords

animal welfarecontrol of feeding behaviourfoie grasforce-feedingliver steatosismulard duck
Type
Articles
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , May 2017 , pp. 135 - 149
Copyright
© 2017 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) 2014 Welfare Implications of Foie Gras Production – Literature Review. American Veterinary Medical Association Animal Welfare Division: Illinois, USAGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2015 Arrêté du 21 avril 2015 établissant des normes minimales relatives à l'hébergement des palmipèdes des-tinés à la production de foie gras. Journal Officiel de la République Française n°0101 p 7527 texte n° 39. [Title translation: Bylaw of 21 April 2015 setting the minimum standards for the housing of waterfowl (ducks and geese) used in the production of foie gras]Google Scholar
Arnaud, I, Mignon-Grasteau, S, Larzul, C, Guy, G, Faure, JM and Guémené, D 2008 Behavioural and physiological fear responses in ducks: genetic cross effects. Animal 2: 1518–1525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108002784CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babilé, R, Auvergne, A, Andrade, V, Héraut, F, Bénard, G, Bouiller-Oudot, M and Manse, H 1996 Réversibilité de la stéatose hépatique chez le canard mulard. 2èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 107–110. 12-13 March 1996, Bordeaux, France. Institut Technique de l'Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: The reversibility of hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) in the mule duck]Google Scholar
Baéza, E 2006 Major trends in research into domestic ducks and recent results concerning meat quality. Proceedings of the 12th European Poultry Conference pp 1–8. 10-14 September 2006, Verona, ItalyGoogle Scholar
Baéza, E, Marie-Etancelin, C, Davail, S and Diot, C 2013 La stéatose hépatique chez les palmipèdes. INRA Productions Animales 26: 403–414. [Title translation: Hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) in waterfowl (ducks and geese)]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, A 2009 Animal Welfare Approved Technical Advice Fact Sheet No 7: Foot Pad Dermatitis in Poultry. Animal Welfare Approved: Marion, USA. https://animalwelfareapproved.us/stan-dards/science-and-research/Google Scholar
Bénard, G, Bénard, P, Prehn, D, Jouglar, JY and Durand, S 1998 Démonstration de la réversibilité de la stéatose hépatique obtenue par gavage de canards mulards. Étude réalisée sur 3 cycles de gavage.3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 49–52.27-28 October 1998, Bordeaux, France. Institut Technique de l'Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Demonstration of the reversibility of hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) due to force-feeding in mule ducks; a study over 3 cycles of force-feeding]Google Scholar
Bénard, G, Bengone-Ndong, T, Prehn, D, Durand, S, Labie, C and Bénard, P 2006 Contribution à l'étude de la physiologie du canard en gavage: étude de la stéatose hépatique. Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France 159: 43–51. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/47811. [Title translation: A contri-bution towards the study of the physiology of the force-fed duck: a study of hepatic steatosis (fatty liver)]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijja, M, Dubois, JP, Lavigne, F, Auvergne, A, Arroyo, J and Fernandez, X 2013 Influence de l'ombre et du soleil sur le com-portement et le bien-être des canards mulards pret à gaver en periode estivale. 10èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 238–242. 26-28 March 2013, La Rochelle, France. Institut Technique de l'Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: The influence of shade and of sun on the behaviour and welfare of mule ducks ready for force-feeding in the summer]Google Scholar
Boivin, X, Lensink, J, Tallet, C and Veissier, I 2003 Stockmanship and farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare 12: 479–492Google Scholar
Bonnefont, C, De Leotoing d'Anjony, H, Guy, G, Laverze, J-B, Brachet, M, Fortun-Lamothe, L and Fernandez, X 2015 Effet de la stimulation lumineuse sur le déclenchement de la stéatose hépatique chez l'oie en absence de gavage. 11èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 1077–1081. 25-26 March 2015, Tours, France. Institut Technique de l'Aviculture: Paris, France. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/294980.[Title translation: Effect of light programmes on the spontaneous fattening of goose liver without over-feeding]Google Scholar
Brachet, M, Guy, G, Fernandez, X, Arroyo, J and Fortun-Lamothe, L 2015 Impacts environnementaux de la production de foie gras d'oie: comparaison des systèmes de production avec ou sans gavage. 11èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 950–953. 25-26 March 2015, Tours, France. Institut Technique de l'Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Environmental impacts of the goose foie gras production: com-parison of systems with or without force-feeding]Google Scholar
Bradshaw, RH, Kirkden, RD and Broom, DM 2002 A review of the aetiology and pathology of leg weakness in broilers in relation to their welfare. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 13: 45–103. https://doi.org/10.3184/147020602783698421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambell, FWR 1965 Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Animals kept under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Broom, DM 1991 Assessing welfare and suffering. Behavioural Processes 25: 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(91)90014-QCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, DM 2008 Welfare assessment and relevant ethical decisions: Key concepts. Annual Revue of Biomedical Sciences 10: T79–T90. https://doi.org/10.5016/1806-8774.2008.v10pt79Google Scholar
Broom, DM and Johnson, KG 2000 Assessing welfare: short-term responses. Stress and Animal Welfare. Kluwer: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Carrière, ML, Roussel, S, Bernadet, M-D, Duvant-Ponter, C and Servière, J 2006 Effet du gavage sur le comportement post prandial des canards mulards. 7èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 84–89. 18-19 October 2006, Arcachon, France. Institut Technique de l'Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Effect of force-feeding on postprandial behaviour in mule ducks]Google Scholar
Centre d'Etudes des Palmipèdes du Sud Ouest Cepso Chambagri (Cepso) 2013 Le logement collectif pour le gavage des canards. http://www.dordogne.chambagri.fr/fileadmin/docu-ments_ca24/Internet/Palmipedes/BROCHURE_CEPSO_2013_ VF.pdf. [Title translation: Group housing for the force-feeding of ducks]Google Scholar
Council of Europe 1999 Recommendation concerning Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata) and hybrids of Muscovy and domestic ducks (Ana platyrhynchos). https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommon SearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168052d5d7Google Scholar
Ekesbo, I 2011 Ducks: domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) and Muscovy ducks (Caraina moschata). Ducks: domestic ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) and Muscovy ducks (Caraina moschata). CABI: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Faure, JM, Guémené, D, Destombes, N, Gouraud, P and Guy, G 1998 Test d'aversion au gavage et au gaveur chez le canard mulard mâle. 3èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 75–78. 27-28 October, Bordeaux, France. Institut Technique de l'Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Test of aversion to force-feeding and to the force-feeder in the male mule duck]Google Scholar
Faure, JM, Guémené, D and Guy, G 2001 Is there avoidance of the force-feeding procedure in ducks and geese? Animal Research 50: 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2001111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, JM, Val-Laillet, D, Guy, G, Bernadet, MD and Guémené, D 2003 Fear and stress reactions in two species of duck and their hybrid. Hormones and Behaviour 43: 568–572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0018-506X(03)00062-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez, X, Gérard, G, Laverze, J-B, Fortun-Lamothe, L and Lazzarotto, V 2015 Analyse compare de la composition chi-mique et des qualités sensorielles des fois d'oies issus du gavage ou d'un engraissement spontané. 11èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 1181–1185. 25-26 March 2015, Tours, France. Institut Technique de l'Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title trans-lation: A comparative study of the chemical composition and senso-ry qualities of livers obtained by force-feeding or by natural fattening]Google Scholar
Fernandez, X, Guy, G and Lamothe, L 2013 Induction d'une stéatose hépatique spontanée chez l'oie grise (Anser anser): Rôle de l'hyperphagie provoquée. Poster presentation at Journées d'Animation Scientifique du département Phase (JAS Phase). 3-4 October, Paris, France. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/279396. [Title translation: Initiation of spontaneous hepatic steatosis (fatty liver) in the greylag goose (Anser anser): the role of stimulated hyperphagia]Google Scholar
Flament, A, Delleur, V, Poulipoulis, A and Marlier, D 2012 Corticosterone, cortisol, triglycerides, aspartate aminotrans-ferase and uric acid plasma concentrations during foie gras pro-duction in male mule ducks (Anas platyrhynchos × Cairina moschata) British Poultry Science 53(4): 408–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.711468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabarrou, JF, Salichon, MR, Guy, G and Blum, JC 1996 Hybrid ducks overfed with boiled corn develop an acute hepatic steatosis with decreased choline and polyunsaturated fatty acid level in phospholipids. Reproduction Nutrition Development, EDP Sciences 36(5): 473–484CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guémené, D, Bernadet, M-D, Richard-Mialon, MM, Val-Laillet, D, Bouy, S, Arnaud, I, Gobin, E, Gardin, E, Couty, M, Garreau-Mills, M, Gouraud, P, Meyer, I, Larzul, C, Grasteau, S, Dubos, F, Coudurier, B, Faure, JM and Guy, G 2006b Le ‘nervo-sisme’ chez le canard mulard. Synthèse des acquis de la recherche et perspectives. 7èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 66–73. 18-19 October 2006, Arcachon, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/12271. [Title translation: Nervousness in the mule duck. A synthesis of research findings and perspectives]Google Scholar
Guémené, D, Faure, JM, Gobin, E, Garreau-Mills, M, Doussan, I, Gouraud, P and Guy, G 2002 Effets de la familiar-ization à l'homme sur les réponses comportementales de peur chez le canard mulard. 5èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 58–62. 9-10 October 2002, Pau, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Effects of familiarisation to people on the behavioural responses of fear in the mule duck]Google Scholar
Guémené, D and Guy, G 2004 The past, present and future of force-feeding and ‘foie gras’ production. World's Poultry Science Journal 60: 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1079/wps200414Google Scholar
Guémené, D, Guy, G, Mirabito, L, Servière, J and Faure, JM 2007 Waterfowl welfare and rearing conditions for meat and foie gras production. INRA Productions Animales 20: 53–58Google Scholar
Guémené, D, Guy, G, Noirault, J, Destombes, N and Faure, JM 2006a Rearing conditions during the force-feeding period in male mule ducks and their impact upon stress and welfare. Animal Research 55: 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2006028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guémené, D, Guy, G, Noirault, J, Garreau-Mills, M, Gouraud, P and Faure, JM 2001 Force-feeding procedure and physiological indicators of stress in male mule ducks. British Poultry Science 42(5): 650–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660120088489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guémené, D, Larzul, C, Bouy, S, Bernadet, MD, Guy, G and Faure, JM 2004 Couleur du plumage et déterminisme des com-portements de peur chez le canard mulard. 6èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 99–104. 7-8 October 2004, Arcachon, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Feather colour and determinism of fear behaviours in the mule duck]Google Scholar
Guy, G, Fortun-Lamothe, L, Bénard, G and Fernandez, X 2013 Natural induction of spontaneous liver steatosis in Greylag Landaise geese. Journal of Animal Science 91: 455–464. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, G, Guémené, D and Servière, J 2007 Le canard autoga-vant et/ou le foie gras sans gavage: mythe ou réalité réflexions sur les perspectives de recherches et d'applications. Réunion du Groupe Palmipèdes INRA pp 13–14. 3 June 2007, Toulouse, France. INRA Editions: Paris, France. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/14032.[Title translation: The self-feeding duck and/or foie gras without force-feeding: myth or reality reflection on the perspectives of research and of practice]Google Scholar
Harr, KE 2005 Diagnostic value of biochemistry. In: Harrison, GJ and Lightfoot, T (eds) Clinical Avian Medicine, Volume 2 pp 611–629. Spix Publishing: Florida, USA. http://avianmedicine.net/content/uploads/2013/08/23_biochemistry.pdfGoogle Scholar
Haslam, SM, Knowles, TJ, Brown, SN, Wilkins, LJ, Kestin, SC, Warriss, PD and Nicol, CJ 2007 Factors affecting the prevalence of foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. British Poultry Science 48: 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701371341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemsworth, P 2007 Ethical stockmanship. Australian Veterinary Journal 85: 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2007.00112.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hepworth, PJ, Nefedov, AV, Muchnik, IB and Morgan, KL 2011 Hock burn: an indicator of broiler flock health. Veterinary Record 168: 303–305. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.c6897CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, TA and Dawkins, MS 2010a Environment and manage-ment factors affecting Pekin duck production and welfare on com-mercial farms in the UK. British Poultry Science 51: 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660903421159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, TA and Dawkins, MS 2010b Effect of environment on Pekin duck behaviour and its correlation with body condition on commercial farms in the UK. British Poultry Science 51: 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.499143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, TA, Waitt, CD and Dawkins, MS 2009 Water off a duck's back: Showers and troughs match ponds for improving duck welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116: 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knierim, U, Bulheller, MA, Kuhnt, A, Briese, A and Hartung, J 2004 Wasserangebot für Enten bei Stallhaltung ein Überblick aufgrund der Literatur und eigener Erfahrung. Deutsche Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 111: 115–118. [Title translation: The provision of water for housed ducks: an overview of the literature and personal experience]Google Scholar
Laborde, M, Peillod, C, Litt, J, Bernadet, M-D, Guy, G, Dubois, JP, Arroyo, J, Auvergue, A, Fortun-Lamothe, L and Fernandez, X 2010 Bilan des innovations techniques visant à assurer la durabilité de la filière palmipèdes à fois gras 2007-2009.9èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 217–225. 7-8 October 2010, Bordeaux, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: An assessment of technical innovations aimed at ensuring the durabil-ity of the foie gras industry in 2007-2009]Google Scholar
Laborde, M and Voisin, M 2013 Identification des pratiques d’él-evage et évaluation de l'impact sur le comportement des canards en gavage. 10èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 232–237. 26-28 March 2013, La Rochelle, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Identification of rearing practices and evaluation of their impact on the behaviour of ducks during force-feeding]Google Scholar
Legler, M, Brandenburger, G, Hietter, B, Siméoni, M and Reinhardt, B 1982 Diurnal cortisol peaks and their relationships to meals. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 55(4): 757–761. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-55-4-757Google Scholar
Liste, G, Kirkden, RD and Broom, DM 2012 A commercial trial evaluating three open water sources for farmed ducks: effects on health and production. British Poultry Science 53: 576–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.736613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liste, G, Kirkden, RD and Broom, DM 2013 A commercial trial evaluating three open water sources for farmed ducks: water usage and water quality. British Poultry Science 54: 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.763900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Litt, J 2010 Comparaison de differents modes de logements en gavage: influence sur le produit, le bien-être animal et les conditions de travail. 9èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 203–206. 7-8 October 2010, Bordeaux, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: A comparison of different types of housing in force-feeding: influ-ence on the product, on animal welfare and on work conditions]Google Scholar
Litt, J, Chaumier, J, Bernadet, M-D, Laborde, M, Vogelaer, J, Albaric, O, Huguet, J-M and Guérin, J-L 2015b Validation his-tologique du systeme de notation des dermatitis du coussinet plantaire chez le canard mulard à differents ages. 11èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 247–251. 25-26 March 2015, Tours, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Histological validation of a foot-pad dermatitis scoring system appropriate for mule duck]Google Scholar
Litt, J, Chaumier, J, Laborde, M, Bernadet, M-D, Vogelaer, J, Boucher, M and Bignon, L 2015a Mise au point d'une grille d'indicateurs permettant l’évaluation de l'integrité physique du canard mulard. 11èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 1012–1017. 25-26 March 2015, Tours, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Establishment of an animal-based indicators grid for the assess-ment of physical integrity of mule duck]Google Scholar
Litt, J, Chaumier, J, Laborde, M, Bernadet, M-D, Vogelaer, J, Boucher, M and Bignon, L 2015c Evaluation de l'integrité physique du canard mulard dans des élevages commerciaux: état des lieux.11èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 876–880. 25-26 March 2015, Tours, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Evaluation of the physi-cal integrity of mule duck in commercial farms: inventory]Google Scholar
Litt, J and Pé, M-P 2015 Principales évolutions du marché du foie gras et des résultats techniques à l'echelle des ateliers d’élevage et de gavage ces dix dernières années. 11èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 147–152. 25-26 March 2015, Tours, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title trans-lation: Main developments in foie gras market and technical results of French breeding and fattening units over the last decade]Google Scholar
Makagon, MM, Woolley, R and Karcher, DM 2015 Assessing the waddle: An evaluation of a 3-point gait score system for ducks. Poultry Science 94: 1729–1734. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marie-Etancelin, C, Retailleau, B, Alinier, A and Vitezica, ZG 2015 Sex impact on the quality of fatty liver and its genetic determinism in mule ducks. Journal of Animal Science 93: 4252–4257. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, GJ and Burn, CC 2011 Behavioural restriction. In: Appleby MC, Mench JA, Olsson IAS and Hughes BO (eds) Animal Welfare, Second Edition pp 98–119. CABI: Wallingford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiaud, A, Héraut, F, Klein, S and Brevault, N 2013 Study of a nutritional solution to improve performances and technolog-ical yield of ‘foies gras’. 10èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 365–367. 26-28 March 2013, La Rochelle, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
Mirabito, L, Guéméné, D, Doussan, I, Guy, G, Héraut, F, Sazy, E and Faure, JM 2002c Effet de la taille du groupe et de la surface allouée pendant la périodes de gavage chez le canard mulard: III Corticostéronémie. 5èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 84–87. 9-10 October 2002, Pau, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France.[Title translation: Effect of group size and density during the force-feeding period on the mule duck: III Corticosteronaemia]Google Scholar
Mirabito, L, Héraut, F, Blériot, G, Ducamp, C and Sazy, E 2006 Logement collectif du canard mulard durant la phase de gav-age: les nouveaux systèmes au banc d’éssai. 7èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 209–213. 18-19 October 2006, Arcachon, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Group housing of the mule duck during force-feeding: trialling the new systems]Google Scholar
Mirabito, L, Sazy, E, Héraut, F, Faure, JM, Guéméné, D and Guy, G 2002b Effet de la taille du groupe et de la surface allouée pendant la périodes de gavage chez le canard mulard: II Résultats comportementaux. 5èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 80–83. 9-10 October 2002, Pau, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Effect of group size and density during the force-feeding period on the mule duck: II Behaviour results]Google Scholar
Mirabito, L, Sazy, E, Héraut, F, Guéméné, D, Faure, JM and Guy, G 2002a Effet de la taille du groupe et de la surface allouée pendant la période de gavage chez le canard mulard: I Résultats zootechniques. 5èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 76–79. 9-10 October 2002, Pau, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France. [Title translation: Effect of group size and density during the force-feeding period on the mule duck: I Technical results]Google Scholar
Mohammed, AAA, Abdel-Rahman, MAM and Darwish, MHA 2014 Force-feeding as a stress factor on Muscovy ducks. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Research 4: 166–173Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, KKM and Broom, DM 2011 Does access to open water affect the health of Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Poultry Science 90: 299–307. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00883CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Driscoll, KKM and Broom, DM 2012 Does access to open water affect the behaviour of Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 136: 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenburg, TB, Bracke, MBM, Berk, J, Cooper, J, Faure, JM, Guémené, D, Guy, G, Harlander, A, Jones, T, Knierim, U, Kuhnt, K, Pingel, H, Reiter, K, Servière, J and Ruis, MAW 2005 Review: Welfare of ducks in European duck husbandry systems. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, AC and Fantozzi, R 2013 The role of histamine in neuro-genic inflammation. British Journal of Phamacology 170: 38–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.12266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraiva, S, Saraiva, C and Stilwell, G 2016 Feather conditions and clinical scores as indicators of broilers welfare at the slaugh-terhouse. Research in Veterinary Science 107: 75–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (SCAHAW) 1998 Welfare aspects of the production of foie gras in ducks and geese. CEC, DGXXIV. Adopted December 16, 1998. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium. https://www.wakkerdier.nl/uploads/media_items/ec-rap-port- foiegras.original.pdfGoogle Scholar
Servière, J, Bernadet, MD, Guy, G and Guéméné, D 2002 Données neurophysiologiques sur la nociception potentiellement associée à l'ingestion forcée chez le canard mulard. 5èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras pp 70–75. 9-10 October 2002, Pau, France. Institut Technique de l’Aviculture: Paris, France.[Title translation: Neurophysiological data on nociception potential-ly associated with force-feeding in the mule duck]Google Scholar
Servière, J, Carrière, M, Duvaux-Ponter, C, Guy, G and Roussel, S 2011 Neurogenic inflammation in the upper digestive tract of the mule duck: effect of a chemical algogen and force-feeding. British Poultry Science 52(6): 792–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2011.640660CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, EM and Fairchild, BD 2010 Footpad dermatitis in poultry. Poultry Science 89: 2043–2053. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00770Google ScholarPubMed
Shettleworth, SJ 2010 Cognition, Evolution and Behaviour, Second Edition pp 136–166. Oxford University Press, Inc: Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
Shriprasad, S and Shilpashree, HS 2012 Gag reflex: no more a gag to a dentist, the behavioural techniques, pharmacological techniques, acupressure and acupuncture in controlling the gag reflex: a review. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science 11(1): 12–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v11i1.9816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waitt, C, Jones, T and Dawkins, MS 2009 Behaviour, syn-chrony and welfare of Pekin ducks in relation to water use. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 121: 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, CA 2014 Poultry handling and transport. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport, Fourth Edition pp 378–398. CABI: Wallingford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781780643212.0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welfare Quality® Consortium 2009 Welfare Quality® Assessment Protocol for Poultry. Welfare Quality®: Lelystad, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Williams, AS 2009 Lifecycle analysis: a step by step approach. Illinois Sustainable Technology (IST) Report TR-040. IST Center, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, USA. http://www.istc.illi-nois.edu/info/library_docs/tr/tr40.pdfGoogle Scholar