Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:57:57.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The welfare of long-line tethered and free-ranging horses kept on public grazing land in South Wales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

S Mullan*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol Veterinary School, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
C Szmaragd
Affiliation:
University of Bristol Veterinary School, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
J Hotchkiss
Affiliation:
Cardiff Trading Standards Department, County Hall, Atlantic Wharf, Cardiff CF10 4UW, UK
HR Whay
Affiliation:
University of Bristol Veterinary School, Langford, Somerset BS40 5DU, UK
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Siobhan.Mullan@bristol.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A welfare assessment was conducted during 475 observations of 75 long-line tethered horses and 587 observations of 112 freerange horses kept on public grazing land in South Wales over a six-month period from March to August 2010. The observations included quantitative and qualitative behavioural assessments, assessments of physical welfare and assessments of the environment of the horse. Multi-level modelling was used to identify the significant factors affecting each measure. Tethered horses had similar behavioural repertoires to free-range horses but there were differences related to tethering, such as fewer observations of walking, trotting and cantering, increased vocalisations occurring during the observation and poorer qualitative ‘mood’ scores. There were few observations of severe physical welfare problems in either tethered or free-range horses, however tethered horses were observed more often to have eye abnormalities, hoof cracks, lameness and signs of limb pain but less often with mane and tail tangles, as thin or as dirty. Shelter from wind, rain or sun was available to almost all free-range horses (99.8% of observations) but was only found during 16.5% or fewer observations of tethered horses, giving them a greater risk of poor welfare during inclement weather. Similarly, tethered horses were infrequently observed to have access to clean water, and their willingness to drink when offered water, suggests the provision of water was inadequate and tethered horses may have been thirsty. There were significant confounding effects of the observer or climatic factors for some behavioural and physical measures that should be considered when conducting future studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2014 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

References

Animal Welfare Act 2006 Animal Welfare Act. Office for Public Sector Information: UK. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/45Google Scholar
Ashley, FH, Waterman-Pearson, AE and Whay, HR 2005 Behavioural assessment of pain in horses and donkeys: application to clinical practice and future studies. Equine Veterinary Journal 37: 565575. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/042516405775314826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blokhuis, HJ, Jones, RB, Geers, R, Miele, M and Veissier, I 2003 Measuring and monitoring animal welfare: transparency in the food product quality chain. Animal Welfare 12: 44545510.1017/S096272860002604XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burn, CC, Dennison, TL and Whay, HR 2010 Relationships between behaviour and health in working horses, donkeys, and mules in developing countries. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 126: 109118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaplin, SJ and Gretgrix, L 2010 Effect of housing conditions on activity and lying behaviour of horses. Animal 4: 792795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109991704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Defra 2002 The consultation on an animal welfare bill: analysis of the replies. Department for Enviroment, Food and Rural Affairs: London UKGoogle Scholar
Duncan, P 1980 Time-budgets of Camargue Horses 2. Timebudgets of adult horses and weaned sub-adults. Behaviour 72: 2649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853980X00023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, R, Buckley, P and Cooper, JJ 2009 Effects of different forms of exercise on post inhibitory rebound and unwanted behaviour in stabled horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 41: 487492. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/095777309X383883CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harewood, EJ and McGowan, CM 2005 Behavioral and physiological responses to stabling in naive horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 25: 164170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2005.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausberger, M, Roche, H, Henry, S and Visser, EK 2008 A review of the human-horse relationship. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 109: 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applan-im.2007.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houpt, K, Houpt, TR, Johnson, JL, Erb, HN and Yeon, SC 2001 The effect of exercise deprivation on the behaviour and physiology of straight stall confined pregnant mares. Animal Welfare 10: 25726710.1017/S0962728600024039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaitner, J, Sowe, J, Secka-Njie, E and Dempfle, L 2001 Ownership pattern and management practices of small ruminants in The Gambia: implications for a breeding programme. Small Ruminant Research 40: 101108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00221-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jongman, EC, Bidstrup, I and Hemsworth, PH 2005 Behavioural and physiological measures of welfare of pregnant mares fitted with a novel urine collection device. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93: 147163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R and Hall, C 2009 The use of a mirror reduces isolation stress in horses being transported by trailer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116: 237243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoot, I and Hoffmann, M 2004 Do season and habitat influence the behaviour of Haffinger mares in a coastal dune area? Belgian Journal of Zoology 134: 97103Google Scholar
Leeb, C, Henstridge, C, Dewhurst, K and Bazeley, K 2003 Welfare assessment of working donkeys: assessment of the impact of an animal healthcare project in West Kenya. Animal Welfare 12: 689694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, SM, Freeman, DA, Cymbaluk, NF, Schott, HC, Hinchcliff, K and Kyle, B 1999 Behavior of stabled horses provided continuous or intermittent access to drinking water. American Journal of Veterinary Research 60: 14511456Google ScholarPubMed
Morel, M, McBride, SD, Chiam, RS, McKay, A and Ely, E 2006 Seasonal variations in physiological and behavioural parameters in a bachelor group of stallion ponies (Equus caballus). Animal Science 82: 581590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/ASC200669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Equine Welfare Council 2006 Code of Practice for Tethering Equines. National Equine Welfare Council: Kenilworth, UKGoogle Scholar
National Equine Welfare Council 2009 Equine Industry Welfare Guidelines Compendium for Horses, Ponies and Donkeys. National Equine Welfare Council: Kenilworth, UKGoogle Scholar
Ovnicek, GD, Page, BT and Trotter, GW 2003 Natural balance trimming and shoeing: its theory and application. Veterinary Clinics of North America-Equine Practice 19: 353377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0739(03)00017-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, JC, Lindberg, AC, Main, DCJ and Whay, HR 2005 Assessment of the welfare of working horses, mules and donkeys, using health and behaviour parameters. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 69: 265283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pritchard, JC, Burn, CC, Barr, ARS and Whay, HR 2008 Validity of indicators of dehydration in working horses: a longitudinal study of changes in skin tent duration, mucous membrane dryness and drinking behaviour. Equine Veterinary Journal 40: 558564. http://dx.doi.org/10.2746/042516408X297462CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasbash, J, Steele, F, Browne, W and Prosser, B 2004 A User's Guide to MLWiN. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, Institute of Education, University of London: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Rollin, BE 1993 Animal welfare, science and value. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6: 4450Google Scholar
RSPCA 2011 Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.rspca.org.uk/utilities/faq/-/question/ENQCAD TetheringHorsesPoniesGoogle Scholar
Shaw, P 2003 Multivariate Statistics for the Environmental Sciences. Hodder Arnold Oxford University Press: New York, USAGoogle Scholar
Sondergaard, E and Halekoh, U 2003 Young horses’ reactions to humans in relation to handling and social environment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84: 265280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDierendonck, MC, de Vries, H, Schilder, MBH, Colenbrander, B, Porhallsdottir, AG and Sigurjonsdottir, H 2009 Interventions in social behaviour in a herd of mares and geldings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116: 6773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh Assembly Government 2008 Code of Practice for the Welfare of Equines. Welsh Assembly Government: Cardiff, UKGoogle Scholar
Welsh Assembly Government 2011 A study of vulnerable equines across South Wales. Welsh Assembly Government: Cardiff, UKGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder, F, Hunter, EA, Mendl, MT and Lawrence, AB 2000 The spontaneous qualitative assessment of behavioural expressions in pigs: first explorations of a novel methodology for integrative animal welfare measurement. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 67: 193215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00093-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Mullan et al. supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 60.8 KB