Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:45:14.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diet supplementation with cinnamon oil, cinnamaldehyde, or monensin does not reduce enteric methane production of dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2015

C. Benchaar
C. Benchaar*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, 2000 College Street, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada J1M 0C8
*
†E-mail: chaouki.benchaar@agr.gc.ca
Get access

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary addition of cinnamon oil (CIN), cinnamaldehyde (CDH), or monensin (MON) on enteric methane (CH4) emission in dairy cows. Eight multiparous lactating Holstein cows fitted with ruminal cannulas were used in a replicated 4×4 Latin square design (28-day periods). Cows were fed (ad libitum) a total mixed ration ((TMR); 60 : 40 forage : concentrate ratio, on a dry matter (DM) basis) not supplemented (CTL), or supplemented with CIN (50 mg/kg DM intake), CDH (50 mg/kg DM intake), or monensin (24 mg/kg of DM intake). Dry matter intake (DMI), nutrient digestibility, N retention, and milk performance were measured over 6 consecutive days. Ruminal degradability of the basal diet (with no additive) was assessed using in sacco incubations (0, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h). Ruminal fermentation characteristics (pH, volatile fatty acids (VFA), and ammonia (NH3)) and protozoa were determined over 2 days. Enteric CH4 emissions were measured over 6 consecutive days using the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas technique. Adding CIN, CDH or MON to the diet had no effects on DMI, N retention, in sacco ruminal degradation and nutrient digestibility of the diet. Ruminal fermentation characteristics and protozoa numbers were not modified by including the feed additives in the diet. Enteric CH4 emission and CH4 energy losses averaged 491 g/day and 6.59% of gross energy intake, respectively, and were not affected by adding CIN, CDH or MON to the diet. Results of this study indicate that CIN, CDH and MON are not viable CH4 mitigation strategies in dairy cows.

Keywords

essential oilsmonensinenteric methane productiondairy cow
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , March 2016 , pp. 418 - 425
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food in Canada 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appuhamy, JA, Strathe, AB, Jayasundara, S, Wagner-Riddle, C, Dijkstra, J, France, J and Kebreab, E 2013. Anti-methanogenic effects of monensin in dairy and beef cattle: a meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 5161–5173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemistry (AOAC) 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, K, McAllister, TA and McGinn, S 2009. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane from cattle. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 35, 1–18.Google Scholar
Benchaar, C and Greathead, H 2011. Essential oils and opportunities to mitigate enteric methane emissions from ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 338–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benchaar, C, Hassanat, F, Gervais, R, Chouinard, PY, Julien, C, Petit, HV and Massé, DI 2013. Effects of increasing amounts of corn dried distillers grains with solubles in dairy cow diets on methane production, ruminal fermentation, digestion, N balance, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 2413–2427.Google Scholar
Benchaar, C, McAllister, TA and Chouinard, PY 2008. Digestion, ruminal fermentation, ciliate protozoal populations, and milk production from dairy cows fed cinnamaldehyde, quebracho condensed tannin, or yucca schidigera saponin extracts. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4765–4777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benchaar, C, Petit, HV, Berthiaume, R, Whyte, TD and Chouinard, PY 2006. Effects of addition of essential oils and monensin premix on digestion, ruminal fermentation, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 4352–4364.Google Scholar
Broderick, GA 2004. Effect of low level monensin supplementation on the production of dairy cows fed alfalfa silage. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 359–368.Google Scholar
Busquet, M, Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A, Cardozo, PW and Kamel, C 2005. Effects of cinnamaldehyde and garlic oil on rumen microbial fermentation in a dual flow continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2508–2516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busquet, M, Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A and Kamel, C 2006. Plant extracts affect in vitro rumen microbial fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 761–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC) 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. CCAC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency 2007. Compendium of medicating ingredient brochures. Monensin sodium. Retrieved January 14, 2015, from http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/feebet/mib/mib57e.shtml Google Scholar
Cardozo, PW, Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A and Kamel, C 2004. Effects of natural plant extracts on ruminal protein degradation and fermentation profiles in continuous culture. Journal of Animal Science 82, 3230–3236.Google Scholar
Castro-Montoya, J, De Campeneere, S, Van Ranst, G and Fievez, V 2012. Interactions between methane mitigation additives and basal substrates on in vitro methane and VFA production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 176, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaves, AV, Stanford, K, Gibson, LL, McAllister, TA and Benchaar, C 2008. Effects of carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde on intake, rumen fermentation, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of growing lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145, 396–408.Google Scholar
Grainger, C, Williams, R, Eckard, RJ and Hannah, MC 2010. A high dose of monensin does not reduce methane emissions of dairy cows offered pasture supplemented with grain. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 5300–5308.Google Scholar
Guan, H, Wittenberg, KM, Ominski, KH and Krause, DO 2006. Efficacy of ionophores in cattle diets for mitigation of enteric methane. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1896–1906.Google Scholar
Hall, MB, Jennings, JP, Lewis, BA and Robertson, JB 2001. Evaluation of starch analysis methods for feed samples. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 81, 17–21.Google Scholar
Jenkins, TC, Fellner, V and McGuffey, RK 2003. Monensin by fat interactions on trans fatty acids in cultures of mixed ruminal microorganisms grown in continuous fermentors fed corn or barley. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 324–330.Google Scholar
Lourenço, M, Cardozo, PW, Calsamiglia, S and Fievez, V 2008. Effects of saponins, quercetin, eugenol, and cinnamaldehyde on fatty acid biohydrogenation of forage polyunsaturated fatty acids in dual-flow continuous culture fermenters. Journal of Animal Science 86, 3045–3053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macheboeuf, D, Morgavi, DP, Papon, Y, Mousset, JL and Arturo-Schaan, M 2008. Dose-response effects of essential oils on in vitro fermentation activity of the rumen microbial population. Animal Feed Science and Technology 145, 335–350.Google Scholar
Mathew, B, Eastridge, M, Oelker, ER, Firkins, JL and Karnati, SKR 2011. Interactions of monensin with dietary fat and carbohydrate components on ruminal fermentation and production responses by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 396–409.Google Scholar
McDonald, I 1981. A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. The Journal of Agricultural Science 96, 251–252.Google Scholar
McGinn, SM, Beauchemin, KA, Iwaasa, AD and McAllister, TA 2006. Assessment of the sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer technique for measuring enteric methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Environmental Quality 35, 1686–1691.Google Scholar
Pellikaan, WF, Hendriks, WH, Uwimana, G, Bongers, LJGM, Becker, PM and Cone, JW 2011. A novel method to determine simultaneously methane production during in vitro gas production using fully automated equipment. Animal Feed Science and Technology 168, 196–205.Google Scholar
Plaizier, JC, Martin, A, Duffield, T, Bagg, R, Dick, P and McBride, BW 2000. Effect of a prepartum administration of monensin in a controlled-release capsule on apparent digestibilities and nitrogen utilization in transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2918–2925.Google Scholar
Ramanzin, M, Bailoni, L, Schiavon, S and Bittante, G 1997. Effect of monensin on milk production and efficiency of dairy cows fed two diets differing in forage to concentrate ratios. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1136–1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sauer, FD, Fellner, V, Kinsman, R, Kramer, JKG, Jackson, HA, Lee, AJ and Chen, S 1998. Methane output and lactation response in holstein cattle with monensin or unsaturated fat added to the diet. Journal of Animal Science 76, 906–914.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Weatherburn, M 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry (Washington) 28, 971–974.Google Scholar
Yang, WZ, Ametaj, BN, Benchaar, C and Beauchemin, KA 2010a. Dose response to cinnamaldehyde supplementation in growing beef heifers: Ruminal and intestinal digestion. Journal of Animal Science 88, 680–688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, WZ, Ametaj, BN, Benchaar, C, He, ML and Beauchemin, KA 2010b. Cinnamaldehyde in feedlot cattle diets: Intake, growth performance, carcass characteristics, and blood metabolites. Journal of Animal Science 88, 1082–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, WZ, Benchaar, C, Ametaj, BN, Chaves, AV, He, ML and McAllister, TA 2007. Effects of garlic and juniper berry essential oils on ruminal fermentation and on the site and extent of digestion in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5671–5681.Google Scholar