Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T09:46:17.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does the effect of pelleting depend on the wheat sample when fed to chickens?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

V. Pirgozliev ,
M. W. Mirza  and
S. P. Rose
V. Pirgozliev*
Affiliation:
The National Institute of Poultry Husbandry, Harper Adams University, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
M. W. Mirza
Affiliation:
The National Institute of Poultry Husbandry, Harper Adams University, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
S. P. Rose
Affiliation:
The National Institute of Poultry Husbandry, Harper Adams University, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK
*
†E-mail: vpirgozliev@harper-adams.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Experimental comparisons of the nutritional value of different wheat cultivars commonly use feeds in meal form even though the large-scale broiler producers use steam pelleted feeds. The aim of this experiment was to examine the effect of steam pelleting on the performance, dietary N-corrected apparent metabolisable energy (AMEn), total tract dry matter retention (DMR), nitrogen retention (NR) and fat digestibility (FD) coefficients, and digestive tract development of broilers fed four different wheat samples in complete diets. Four European wheat samples, with different chemical composition and endosperm characteristics, were used in a broiler experiment. The wheat samples were milled through a 5 mm screen and four basal feeds containing 670 g/kg of each selected wheat sample were mixed. The basal feeds were then split into two batches and one of them was steam pelleted resulting in eight experimental diets. Each diet was fed ad libitum to eight pens of two male Ross 308 broilers from 10 to 24 days of age. Feeding pelleted diets improved (P<0.001) feed intake and weight gain, and daily water intake of the birds. Pelleting also improved dietary AMEn and FD (P<0.001) and DMR (P<0.05). An interaction (P<0.05) was observed between wheat samples and steam pelleting for NR. Steam pelleting improved (P<0.05) NR in the wheat sample with high starch and protein and hard endosperm but not in the rest of the wheat samples. Similar interactions (P<0.05) were also observed between wheat sample and steam pelleting for gain to feed (G : F) and water to feed (W : F) ratios. Pelleting improved G : F ratio the greatest in the wheat sample with high starch and protein and hard endosperm. Feeding the same wheat sample also decreased (P<0.05) W : F but only in the mash diets. Regardless of the wheat sample the values of dietary AMEn did not differ (P>0.05). Feeding different wheat types and pelleting did not (P>0.05) change the development of the gastrointestinal tract of the birds. The study showed that there were differences between four wheat samples when they were fed in pelleted complete feed, but no differences were observed when fed in mash form complete diets. Research on the interaction between pelleting and wheat chemical and quality characteristics is warranted.

Keywords

wheatbroilersgrowth performancewater intakegut development
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , April 2016 , pp. 571 - 577
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdollahi, MR, Ravindran, V and Svihus, B 2013. Pelleting of broiler diets: an overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Animal Feed Science and Technology 179, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdollahi, MR, Ravindran, V, Wester, TJ, Ravindran, G and Thomas, DV 2011. Influence of feed form and conditioning temperature on performance, apparent metabolisable energy and ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen in broiler starters fed wheat-based diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 168, 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerah, AM and Ravindran, V 2008. Influence of method of whole-wheat feeding on the performance, digestive tract development and carcass traits of broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 326–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amerah, AM, Ravindran, V and Lentle, RG 2009. Influence of wheat hardness and xylanase supplementation on the performance, energy utilisation, digestive tract development and digesta parameters of broiler starters. Animal Production Science 49, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Association of Cereal Chemists 2000. Approved methods of the AACC, 10th edition. AACC, St Paul, MN, USA.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Ball, MEE, Owens, B and McCracken, KJ 2013. Chemical and physical predictors of the nutritive value of wheat in broiler diets. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 26, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camire, ME, Camire, A and Krumhar, K 1990. Chemical and nutritional changes in food during extrusion. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 29, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carre, B, Muley, N, Gomez, J, Oury, F-X, Laffitte, E, Guillou, D and Signoret, C 2005. Soft wheat instead of hard wheat in pelleted diets results in high starch digestibility in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 46, 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Englyst, HN, Quigley, ME and Hudson, GJ 1994. Determination of dietary fiber as non-starch polysaccharides with gas-liquid chromatographic, high performance liquid chromatographic or spectrophotometric measurement of constituent sugars. Analyst 119, 1497–1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Englyst, KN, Hudson, GJ and Englyst, HN 2000. Starch analysis in food. In Encyclopaedia of analytical chemistry (ed. RA Meyers), pp. 4246–4262. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
Faridi, H and Faubion, JM 1995. Wheat usage in North America. In Wheat end uses around the world (ed. H Faridi and JM Faubion), pp. 1–41. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, MN, USA.Google Scholar
Furuse, M, Yang, SI, Niwa, H and Okumura, J 1991. Effect of short chain fatty acids on the performance and intestinal weight in germ free and conventional chicks. British Poultry Science 32, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutierrez-Alamo, A, Perez de Ayala, P, Verstegen, MWA, Den Hartog, LA and Villamide, MJ 2008. Variability in wheat: factors affecting its nutritional value. World’s Poultry Science Journal 64, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, FW and Anderson, DL 1958. Comparison of metabolisable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. Journal of Nutrition 64, 587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchel, H, Langridge, P, Mosionek, L, Williams, K and Jefferies, SP 2006. The genetic control of milling yield, dough rheology and baking quality of wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112, 1487–1495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pirgozliev, V, Birch, CL, Rose, SP, Kettlewell, PS and Bedford, MR 2003. Chemical composition and the nutritive quality of different wheat cultivars for broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 44, 464–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pirgozliev, V, Rose, SP, Pellny, T, Amerah, AM, Wickramasinghe, M, Ulker, M, Rakszegi, M, Bedo, Z, Shewry, PR and Lovegrove, A 2015. Energy utilization and growth performance of chickens fed novel wheat inbred lines selected for different pentosan levels with and without xylanase supplementation. Poultry Science 94, 232–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, SP, Tucker, LA, Kettlewell, PS and Collier, JDA 2001. Rapid tests of wheat nutritive value for growing chickens. Journal of Cereal Science 34, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, TA, Silversides, FG, Classen, HL, Swift, ML and Bedford, MR 1998. Effect of cultivar and environment on the feeding value of Western Canadian wheat and barley samples with and without enzyme supplementation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78, 649–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenfeldt, S 2001. The dietary effect of different wheat cultivars for broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 42, 595–609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svihus, B and Hetland, H 2001. Ileal starch digestibility in growing broiler chickens fed on a wheat-based diet is improved by mash feeding, dilution with cellulose or whole wheat inclusion. British Poultry Science 42, 633–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Svihus, B, Kløvstad, KH, Perez, V, Zimonja, O, Sahlstrom, S, Schuller, RB, Jeksrud, WK and Prestløkken, E 2004. Physical and nutritional effects of pelleting of broiler chicken diets made from wheat ground to different coarsenesses by the use of roller mill and hammer mill. Animal Feed Science and Technology 117, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M, van Vliet, T and van der Poel, AFB 1998. Physical quality of pelleted animal feed 3. Contribution of feedstuff components. Animal Feed Science and Technology 70, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voragen, AGJ, Gruppen, H, Marsman, GJP and Mul, AJ 1995. Effect of some manufacturing technologies on chemical, physical and nutritional properties of feed. In Recent advances in animal nutrition: University of Nottingham Feed Manufacturers Conference (ed. PC Garnsworthy and DJA Cole), pp. 93–126. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Wiseman, J, Boorman, N, Short, F, Stringer, S, Snape, J, Orford, S, Angus, W and Garland, P 2001. Nutritional value of wheat for poultry: analysis of gene effects using isogenic lines. Project Report No. 197E, HGCA, London, UK.Google Scholar
Wrigley, CW 1991. Improved tests for cereal-grain quality based on better understanding of composition-quality relationships. In Cereals international (ed. DJ Martin and CW Wrigley), pp. 117–120. Royal Australian Chemistry Institute, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.Google Scholar