Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:57:22.016Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of match or mismatch of maternal–offspring nutritional environment on the development of offspring in broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2010

E. H. van der Waaij ,
H. van den Brand ,
J. A. M. van Arendonk  and
B. Kemp
E. H. van der Waaij
Affiliation:
Adaptation and Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
H. van den Brand
Affiliation:
Adaptation and Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. A. M. van Arendonk
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
B. Kemp*
Affiliation:
Adaptation and Physiology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
†E-mail: Bas.Kemp@wur.nl
Get access

Abstract

In mammals, maternal food restriction around conception and during pregnancy results in low birth weight and an adjusted growth trajectory of offspring. If, subsequently, the offspring are born into a food-abundant environment, they are at increased risk of developing obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and renal dysfunction. Here, we show similar effects of maternal undernutrition on hatch weight, growth and fat deposition in offspring of birds (domestic chicken). Both mothers and offspring were fed either ad libitum or restricted in a two-by-two factorial design, resulting in two matched and two mismatched maternal–offspring nutritional environments. Offspring of ad libitum mothers grew heavier than those of restricted mothers, possibly due to the larger muscle mass. Ad libitum-fed offspring, especially females, of restricted mothers were lighter at hatch, and were heavier and had more abdominal fat at 6 weeks of age than daughters of ad libitum-fed mothers. These results suggest a common mechanism in mammals and birds in response to a mismatch in the maternal–offspring nutritional environment. They also indicate that the common practice of restrictive feeding of the broiler breeders and subsequent ad libitum feeding of the broilers may result in reduced growth and increased abdominal fat as compared to broilers of less restricted broiler breeders.

Keywords

maternal effectbroilermismatchoffspring developmentchicken
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 5 , 04 April 2011 , pp. 741 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, BR, Forsberg, NE, Hu, CY 1985. Potential for altering energy partition in the lactating cow. Journal of Dairy Science 68, 3394–3402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, DJP 1998. Mothers, babies and health in later life, 2nd edition. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Bateson, P, Barker, D, Clutton-Brock, T, Deb, D, D'Udine, B, Foley, RA, Gluckman, P, Godfrey, K, Kirkwood, T, Lahr, MM, McNamara, J, Metcalfe, NB, Monaghan, P, Spencer, HG, Sultan, SE 2004. Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature 430, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cleal, JK, Poore, KR, Boullin, JP, Khan, O, Chau, R, Hambridge, O, Torrens, C, Newman, JP, Poston, L, Noakes, DE, Hanson, MA, Green, LR 2007. Mismatched pre-and postnatal nutrition leads to cardiovascular dysfunction and altered renal function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 9529–9533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coe, CL, Shirtcliff, EA 2004. Growth trajectory evident at birth affects age of first delivery in female monkeys. Pediatric Research 55, 914–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desai, M, Crowther, NJ, Lucas, A, Hales, CN 1996. Organ-selective growth in the offspring of protein restricted mothers. British Journal of Nutrition 76, 591–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dos Santos Silva, I, De Stavola, BL, Mann, V, Kuh, D, Hardy, R, Wadsworth, MEJ 2002. Prenatal factors, childhood growth trajectories and age at menarche. International Journal of Epidemiology 31, 405–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM, Stickland, NC, Fletcher, JM 1994. The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. Journal of Animal Science 72, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fagerberg, B, Bondjers, L, Nilsson, P 2004. Low birth weight in combination with catch-up growth predicts the occurrence of the metabolic syndrome in men at late middle age: the atherosclerosis and insulin resistance study. Journal of Internal Medicine 256, 254–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, SP, Hess, BW, Schwope, MM, Nijland, MJ, Gilbert, JA, Vonnahme, KA, Means, WJ, Han, H, Nathanielsz, PW 2007. Maternal undernutrition during early to mid-gestation in the ewe results in altered growth, adiposity, and glucose tolerance in male offspring. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1285–1294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, CR, Martyn, CN, Kellingray, S, Eastell, R, Cooper, C 2001. Intrauterine programming of adult body composition. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 86, 267–272.Google ScholarPubMed
Gorman, HE, Nager, RG 2004. Prenatal developmental conditions have long-term effects on offspring fecundity. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B 271, 1923–1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasselquist, D, Nilsson, JA 2009. Maternal transfer of antibodies in vertebrates: trans-generational effects on offspring immunity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howie, GJ, Sloboda, DM, Kamal, T, Vickers, MH 2009. Maternal nutritional history predicts obesity in adult offspring independent of postnatal diet. Journal of Physiology 587, 905–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karaolis-Danckert, N, Buyken, AE, Sonntag, A, Kroke, A 2009. Birth and early life influences on the timing of puberty onset: results from the DONALD (Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed) study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 90, 1559–1565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemke, H, Coutinho, A, Lange, H 2004. Lamarckian inheritance by somatically acquired maternal IgG phenotypes. Trends in Immunology 25, 180–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lourens, A, Van den Brand, H, Meijerhof, R, Kemp, B 2005. Effect of eggshell temperature during incubation on embryo development, hatchability, and posthatch development. Poultry Science 84, 914–920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, DJ, Uller, T 2007. When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116, 1957–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metges, CC 2009. Early nutrition and later obesity: animal models provide insights into mechanisms. In Early nutrition programming and health outcomes in later life (ed. B Koletzko, T Decsi, D Molnár and A de la Hunty), pp. 105–112. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mousseau, TA, Fox, CW 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 403–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozanne, SE, Hales, CN 2004. Lifespan: catch-up growth and obesity in male mice. Nature 427, 411–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozanne, SE, Hales, CN 2005. Poor fetal growth followed by rapid postnatal catch-up growth leads to premature death. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 126, 852–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, DIW 2006. External influences on the fetus and their long-term consequences. Lupus 15, 794–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, SP, Kleemann, DO, Kakar, MA, Owens, JA, Nattrass, GS, Maddocks, S, Walker, SK 2005. Myogenesis in sheep is altered by maternal food intake during the peri-conception period. Animal Reproduction Science 87, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roseboom, T, De Rooij, S, Painter, R 2006. The Dutch famine and its long-term consequences for adult health. Early Human Development 82, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samuelsson, AM, Matthews, PA, Argenton, M, Christie, MR, McConnell, JM, Jansen, EHJM, Piersma, AH, Ozanne, SE, Fernandez Twinn, D, Remacle, C, Rowlerson, A, Poston, L, Taylor, PD 2008. Diet-induced obesity in female mice leads to offspring hyperphagia, adiposity, hypertension, and insulin resistance. A novel murine model of developmental programming. Hypertension 51, 383–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (SAS) 2003. SAS/STAT Software, release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shankar, K, Harell, A, Liu, X, Gilchrist, JM, Ronis, MJJ, Badger, TM 2008. Maternal obesity at conception programs obesity in the offspring. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 294, R528–R538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taborsky, B 2006a. Mothers determine offspring size in response to own juvenile growth conditions. Biology Letters 2, 225–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taborsky, B 2006b. The influence of juvenile and adult environments on life-history trajectories. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273, 741–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vickers, MH, Breier, BH, Cutfield, WS, Hofman, PL, Gluckman, PD 2000. Fetal origins of hyperphagia, obesity, and hypertension and postnatal amplification by hypercaloric nutrition. American Journal of Physiology – Endocrinology and Metabolism 279, E83–E87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, HR 1991. Interrelationships of egg size, chick size, posthatching growth and hatchability. World's Poultry Science Journal 47, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, MJ, Ford, SP, Nathanielsz, PW, Du, M 2004. Effect of maternal nutrient restriction in sheep on the development of fetal skeletal muscle. Biology and Reproduction 71, 1968–1973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, MJ, Ford, SP, Means, WJ, Hess, BW, Nathanielsz, PW, Du, M 2006. Maternal nutrient restriction affects properties of skeletal muscle in offspring. Journal of Physiology 575, 241–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed