Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:59:14.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of starch-rich or lipid-supplemented diets that induce milk fat depression on rumen biohydrogenation of fatty acids and methanogenesis in lactating dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

A. Bougouin Open the ORCID record for A. Bougouin [Opens in a new window] ,
C. Martin ,
M. Doreau  and
A. Ferlay Open the ORCID record for A. Ferlay [Opens in a new window]
A. Bougouin
Affiliation:
Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
C. Martin
Affiliation:
Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
M. Doreau
Affiliation:
Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
A. Ferlay*
Affiliation:
Université Clermont Auvergne, INRA, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
*
†E-mail: anne.ferlay@inra.fr
Get access

Abstract

Optimizing milk production efficiency implies diets allowing low methane (CH4) emissions and high dairy performance. We hypothesize that nature of energy (starch v. lipids) and lipid supplement types (monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) v. polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) mitigate CH4 emissions and can induce low milk fat content via different pathways. The main objective of this experiment was to study the effects of starch-rich or lipid-supplemented diets that induce milk fat depression (MFD) on rumen biohydrogenation (RBH) of unsaturated fatty acids (FA) and enteric CH4 emissions in dairy cows. Four multiparous lactating Holstein cows (days in milk=61±11 days) were used in a 4×4 Latin square design with four periods of 28 days. Four dietary treatments, three of which are likely to induce MFD, were based (dry matter basis) on 56% maize silage, 4% hay and 40% concentrates rich in: (1) saturated fatty acid (SFA) from Ca salts of palm oil (PALM); (2) starch from maize grain and wheat (MFD-Starch); (3) MUFA (cis-9 C18:1) from extruded rapeseeds (MFD-RS); and (4) PUFA (C18:2n-6) from extruded sunflower seeds (MFD-SF). Intake and milk production were measured daily. Milk composition and FA profile, CH4 emissions and total-tract digestibility were measured simultaneously when animals were in open-circuit respiration chambers. Fermentation parameters were analysed from rumen fluid samples taken before feeding. Dry matter intake, milk production, fat and protein contents, and CH4 emissions were similar among the four diets. We observed a higher milk SFA concentration with PALM and MFD-Starch, and lower milk MUFA and trans-10 C18:1 concentrations in comparison to MFD-RS and MFD-SF diets, while trans-11 C18:1 remained unchanged among diets. Milk total trans FA concentration was greater for MFD-SF than for PALM and MFD-Starch, with the value for MFD-RS being intermediate. Milk C18:3n-3 content was higher for MFD-RS than MFD-SF. The MFD seems more severe with MFD-SF and MFD-RS than PALM and MFD-Starch diets, because of a decrease in milk SFA concentration and a stronger shift from trans-11 C18:1 to trans-10 C18:1 in milk. The MFD-SF diet increased milk trans FA (+60%), trans-10 C18:1 (+31%), trans-10,cis-12 CLA (+27%) and PUFA (+36%) concentrations more than MFD-RS, which explains the numerically lowest milk fat yield and indicates that RBH pathways of PUFA differ between these two diets. Maize silage-based diets rich in starch or different unsaturated FA induced MFD with changes in milk FA profiles, but did not modify CH4 emissions.

Keywords

dairy cowlow-fat milk syndromerumen lipid digestionmilk fatty acidsmethane emissions
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 7 , July 2019 , pp. 1421 - 1431
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauman, DE and Griinari, JM 2003. Nutritional regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annual Review of Nutrition 23, 203–227.Google Scholar
Bougouin, A, Ferlay, A, Doreau, M and Martin, C 2018. Effects of carbohydrate type or bicarbonate addition to grass silage-based diets on enteric methane emissions, milk production, and fatty acid composition in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 6085–6097.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J and Doreau, M 2007. Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109, 828–855.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Martin, C, Rouel, J and Doreau, M 2009. Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed whole crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil, and their relationship with methane output. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5199–5211.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J, Van Zijderveld, SM, Apajalahti, JA, Bannink, A, Gerrits, WJJ, Newbold, JR, Perdok, HB and Berends, H 2011. Relationships between methane production and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 590–595.Google Scholar
Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Meynadier, A and Malpuech-Brugère, C 2017. Production of trans and conjugated fatty acids in dairy ruminants and their putative effects on human health: a review. Biochimie 141, 107–120.Google Scholar
Ferlay, A, Martin, B, Lerch, S, Gobert, M, Pradel, P and Chilliard, Y 2010. Effects of supplementation of maize silage diets with extruded linseed, vitamin E and plant extracts rich in polyphenols, and morning vs. evening milking on milk fatty acid profiles in Holstein and Montbéliarde cows. Animal 4, 627–640.Google Scholar
France Conseil Elevage (FCEL) 2013. Résultats 2013 du réseau France Conseil Elevage. Retrieved on 4 February 2018 from http://www.france-conseil-elevage.fr.Google Scholar
Ganguly, R and Pierce, GN 2015. The toxicity of dietary trans fats. Food and Chemical Toxicology 78, 170–176.Google Scholar
Gerber, P, Vellinga, T, Opio, C and Steinfeld, H 2011. Productivity gains and greenhouse gas emissions intensity in dairy systems. Livestock Science 139, 100–108.Google Scholar
Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Doreau, M, Schmidely, P, Sauvant, D and Chilliard, Y 2008. Long chain fatty acid metabolism in dairy cows: a meta-analysis of milk fatty acid yield in relation to duodenal flows and de novo synthesis. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2771–2785.Google Scholar
Grainger, C and Beauchemin, KA 2011. Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 308–320.Google Scholar
Guyader, J, Eugène, M, Nozière, P, Morgavi, DP, Doreau, M and Martin, C 2014. Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emissions in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach. Animal 8, 1816–1825.Google Scholar
He, M and Armentano, LE 2011. Effect of fatty acid profile in vegetable oils and antioxidant supplementation on dairy cattle performance and milk fat depression. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2481–2491.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 2007. Alimentation des bovins ovins et caprins. Besoins des animaux – Valeurs des aliments – Tables INRA 2007. Editions Quae, Versailles, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Jenkins, TC and McGuire, MA 2006. Major advances in nutrition: impact on milk composition. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1302–1310.Google Scholar
Le Mezec, P and Launay, A 2017. Le cheptel laitier français. Evolution génétique et phénotypique 1996-2016. Prévision d’évolution génétique 2016-2022. Edition Institut de l’Elevage, Paris, France. http://idele.fr/no_cache/recherche/publication/idelesolr/recommends/le-cheptel-laitier-francais-2.html.Google Scholar
Lock, AL, Preseault, CL, Rico, JE, De Land, KE and Allen, MS 2013. Feeding a C16:0-enriched fat supplement increased the yield of milk fat and improved conversion of feed to milk. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 6650–6659.Google Scholar
Loor, JJ, Ferlay, A, Ollier, A, Doreau, M and Chilliard, Y 2005. Relationship among trans and conjugated fatty acids and bovine milk fat yield due to dietary concentrate and linseed oil. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 726–740.Google Scholar
McManus, A, Merga, M and Newton, W 2011. Omega-3 fatty acids. What consumers need to know. Appetite 57, 806–883.Google Scholar
Martin, C, Morgavi, DP and Doreau, M 2010. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 4, 351–365.Google Scholar
Morgavi, DP, Jouany, JP and Martin, C 2008. Changes in methane emission and rumen fermentation parameters induced by refaunation in sheep. Animal Production Science 48, 69–72.Google Scholar
Mosley, SA, Mosley, EE, Hatch, B, Szasz, JI, Corato, A, Zacharias, N, Howes, D and McGuire, MA 2007. Effect of varying levels of fatty acids from palm oil on feed intake and milk production in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 987–993.Google Scholar
Niu, M, Kebreab, E, Hristov, AN, Oh, J, Arndt, C, Bannink, A, Bayat, AR, Brito, AF, Boland, T, Casper, D, Crompton, LA, Dijkstra, J, Eugene, M, Garnsworthy, PC, Haque, MN, Hellwing, ALF, Huhtanen, P, Kreuzer, M, Kuhla, B, Lund, P, Madsen, J, Martin, C, McClelland, SC, McGee, M, Moate, PJ, Muetzel, S, Munoz, C, O’Kiely, P, Peiren, N, Reynolds, CK, Schwarm, A, Shingfield, KJ, Storlien, TM, Weisbjerg, MR, Yanez-Ruiz, DR and Yu, Z 2018. Prediction of enteric methane production, yield, and intensity in dairy cattle using an intercontinental database. Global Change Biology 2018, 1–22.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Giger-Reverdin, S and Peyraud, JL 2018. Digestive welfare and rumen acidosis. In INRA Feeding System for Ruminants (ed. Nozière P, Sauvant D and Delaby L), pp. 213–218. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D and Peyraud, JL 2010. Calculs de ration et évaluation du risque d’acidose. INRA Productions Animales 23, 333–342.Google Scholar
Shingfield, KJ, Bernard, L, Leroux, C and Chilliard, Y 2010. Role of trans fatty acids in the nutritional regulation of mammary lipogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4, 1140–1166.Google Scholar
Shingfield, KJ and Griinari, JM 2007. Role of biohydrogenation intermediates in milk fat depression. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109, 799–816.Google Scholar
Williams, AG and Coleman, GS 1992. Methods used for the separation and the cultivation of rumen protozoa. In The rumen protozoa, pp. 133–164. Brock/Springer Series in Contemporary Bioscience, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Williams, SRO, Moate, PJ, Deighton, MH, Hannah, MC and Wales, WJ 2014. Methane emissions of dairy cows cannot be predicted by the concentrations of C8:0 and total C18 fatty acids in milk. Animal Production Science 54, 1757–1761.Google Scholar
Zened, A, Enjalbert, F, Nicot, MC and Troegeler-Meynadier, A 2013. Starch plus sunflower oil addition to the diet of dry dairy cows results in a trans-11 to trans-10 shift of biohydrogenation. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 451–459.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bougouin et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Bougouin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 27.3 KB