Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:32:16.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nutritional properties of potato protein concentrate compared with soybean meal as the main protein source in feed for the double-muscled Belgian Blue bull

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2008

E. Froidmont*
Affiliation:
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Animal Production and Nutrition Department, Rue de Liroux 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
B. Wathelet
Affiliation:
Industrial Biological Chemistry Unit, Gembloux Agricultural University, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
R. Oger
Affiliation:
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Unit of Biometry, Data Processing, and Agrometeorology, Rue de Liroux 9, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
J. M. Romnée
Affiliation:
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Quality of Agricultural Products Department, Chaussée de Namur 24, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
A. Colinet
Affiliation:
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Animal Production and Nutrition Department, Rue de Liroux 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
D. Cloet
Affiliation:
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Animal Production and Nutrition Department, Rue de Liroux 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
M. Didelez
Affiliation:
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Animal Production and Nutrition Department, Rue de Liroux 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
J. C. Pichon
Affiliation:
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Animal Production and Nutrition Department, Rue de Liroux 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
C. Boudry
Affiliation:
Animal Science Unit, Gembloux Agricultural University, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
G. Jean
Affiliation:
Animal Science Unit, Gembloux Agricultural University, Passage des Déportés 2, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
N. Bartiaux-Thill
Affiliation:
Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Animal Production and Nutrition Department, Rue de Liroux 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to compare the nutritional properties of potato protein concentrate, a by-product of the starch industry produced entirely in Europe, with that of soybean meal (SBM), for growing cattle. The experiment was conducted on double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls, fitted with rumen, duodenal and ileal cannulas, according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design. They were fed three different iso-N and iso-net energy diets formulated according to the Dutch feed evaluation system, differing in the nature of the main protein source, which was either SBM (‘SBM’ treatment), potato protein concentrate (PPC, ‘PPC’ treatment) or an iso-N mixture of these two protein sources (‘mixed’ treatment). A fourth treatment consisted of ‘PPC’ supplemented by 9.5% digestible proteins supplied by duodenal perfusion of sodium caseinate (CAS, ‘PPC + CAS’ treatment). No significant difference was observed in the ruminal fluid pH, whereas both ‘PPC’ and ‘PPC + CAS’ had the effect of reducing the ruminal ammonia nitrogen (N-NH3) concentration. No significant difference was observed in the apparent intestinal digestibility of the dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM) or N. Outflows of non-NH3-N, microbial proteins and dietary proteins from the rumen were similar for ‘PPC’, ‘SBM’ and ‘mixed’, and increased with CAS infusion by 20%, 17% and 27%, respectively. On the basis of in vivo observations, the degradability of SBM and PPC proteins was estimated at 0.60 and 0.43, respectively, corresponding to the values quoted in the literature. The supply of digestible essential amino acids (EAA) was significantly greater with ‘PPC + CAS’ and did not differ among ‘SBM’, ‘mixed’ and ‘PPC’. This illustrates the difficulty of altering the amino acid (AA) pattern of digestible protein by the nature of the protein of dietary origin when an animal is fed a high nutritional value diet. N retention was not affected by replacing SBM with PPC, but increased by 10% with CAS infusion. On the basis of the plasma AA pattern, the supply of digestible Met was probably limiting with ‘SBM’, ‘mixed’ and ‘PPC’. The CAS perfusion supplemented all AA, including Met, leading to increased N retention. This improvement was limited, however, and N utilisation remained unchanged between treatments. In conclusion, despite a more favourable EAA pattern, PPC offered no advantage compared with SBM for growing bulls when diets were formulated according to the Dutch feed evaluation system.

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1984. Official methods of analysis, 14th edition. AOAC, Airlington, VA.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Airlington, VA.Google Scholar
Baumont, R, Dulphy, JP, Sauvant, D, Tran, G, Meshy, F, Aufrère, J, Peyraud, JL, Champciaux, P 2007. Les tables de la valeur des aliments. In Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins, besoin des animaux – valeur des aliments. Quae editions, Paris, pp. 181286.Google Scholar
Cabaraux, JF, Dufrasne, I, Roux, M, Istasse, L, Hornick, JL 2005. La production de viande bovine à partir de femelles de réforme. INRA Productions Animales 18, 3748.Google Scholar
Cecava, MJ, Parker, JE 1993. Intestinal supply of amino acids in steers fed ruminally degradable and undegradable crude protein sources alone and in combination. Journal of Animal Science 71, 15961605.Google Scholar
Clarck, JH, Klusmeyer, TH, Cameron, MR 1992. Microbial protein synthesis and flows of nitrogen fractions to the duodenum of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 23042323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, SA, Strydom, DJ 1988. Amino acid analysis utilizing phenylisothiocyanate derivatives. Analytical Biochemistry 174, 116.Google Scholar
Cuvelier, C, Cabaraux, JF, Dufrasne, I, Clinquart, A, Hocquette, JF, Istasse, L, Hornick, JL 2006. Performance, slaughter characteristics and meat quality of young bulls from Belgian Blue, Limousin and Aberdeen Angus breeds fattened with a sugar-beet pulp or a cereal-based diet. Animal Science 82, 125132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centraal Veevoederbureau (2000). Tabellenboek veevoeding 2000. Voedernormen landbouwhuisdieren en voederwaarde veevoeders. CVB, Lelystad, Nederland.Google Scholar
De Campeneere, S, Fiems, LO, Boucqué, CV 2001a. Energy and protein standards for Belgian double-muscled bulls. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 153167.Google Scholar
De Campeneere, S, Fiems, LO, De Paepe, M, Vanacker, JM, Boucqué, CV 2001b. Compositional data on Belgian Blue double-muscled bulls. Animal Research 50, 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehareng, D, Ndibualonji, BB 1994. Naissance et destinée de l’ammoniaque ruminale: revue. 1. Naissance dans le rumen et destinée dans le tube digestif. Annales de Médecine Vétérinaire 138, 387398.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, Cottyn, BG, Boucqué, CV, Bogaerts, DF, Van Eenaeme, C, Vanacker, JM 1997. Effect of beef type, body weight and dietary protein content on voluntary feed intake, digestibility, blood and urine metabolites and nitrogen retention. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrution 77, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
François, E, Thill, N, Théwis, A 1978. Méthode rapide de dosage de l’oxyde de chrome dans les aliments, les fèces et les contenus digestifs par titrage après oxydation nitroperchlorique. Annales de Zootechnie 27, 355361.Google Scholar
Froidmont, E 2001. Détermination des besoins en acides aminés essentiels chez le taurillon Blanc Bleu Belge culard en période de croissance et en période de finition. PhD, Gembloux University.Google Scholar
Froidmont, E, Beckers, Y, Théwis, A 2000. Determination of the methionine requirement of growing double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls with a three-step method. Journal of Animal Science 78, 233241.Google Scholar
Hvelplund, T 1985. Digestibility of rumen microbial protein and undegraded dietary protein estimated in the small intestine of sheep and by in sacco procedure. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica (suppl. 25), 132144.Google Scholar
Kerr, CA, Goodband, RD, Smith, JW, Musser, RE, Bergström, JR, Nessmith, WB Jr, Tokach, MD, Nelssen, JL 1998. Evaluation of potato proteins on growth performance of early-weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 30243033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krzywiecki, S, Bodarski, R, Piechota, A, Wertelecki, T 2003. Rumen degradability of some plant concentrates used as components of mixtures for cattle. Annals of Animal Science 3(suppl. 2), 4144.Google Scholar
Lapierre, H, Lobley, G 2001. Nitrogen recycling in the ruminant: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 84(E. suppl.), E223E236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez de Romana, G, Maclean, WC, Placko, RP, Graham, GG 1981. Fasting and postprandial plasma free amino acids of infants and children consuming exclusively potato protein. Journal of Nutrition 111, 17661771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludden, PA, Cecava, MJ 1995. Supplemental protein sources for steers fed corn-based diets: I. Ruminal characteristics and intestinal amino acid flow. Journal of Animal Science 73, 14661475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchen, NR, Titgemeyer, EC 1992. Manipulation of amino acid supply to the growing ruminant. Journal of Animal Science 70, 32383247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaux, C, Stasse, A, Sonnet, R, Leroy, P, Hanset, R 1983. La composition de la carcasse de taureaux culards Blanc Bleu Belge. Annales de Médecine Vétérinaire 127, 349375.Google Scholar
Montagne, L, Toullec, R, Lallès, JP 2001. Intestinal digestion of dietary and endogenous proteins along the small intestina of calves fed soybean or potato. Journal of Animal Science 79, 27192730.Google Scholar
Montagne, L, Crévieu-Gabriel, I, Toullec, R, Lallès, JP 2003. Influence of dietary protein level and source on the course of protein digestion along the small intestine of the veal calf. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 934943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute of Statistics 2006. Agriculture, Recensement agricole. INS, Bruxelles,Belgium.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academy Press, NRC, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Oosting, SJ, Velmmix, PJ, Van Bruchem, J 1994. Effect of ammonia treatment of wheat straw with or without supplementation of potato protein on intake, digestion and kinetics of comminution, rumen degradation and passage in steers. The British Journal of Nutrition 72, 147165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oosting, SJ, Van Bruchem, J, Chen, XB 1995. Intake, digestion and small intestinal protein availability in sheep in relation to ammoniation of wheat straw with or without protein supplementation. The British Journal of Nutrition 74, 347368.Google Scholar
Poncet, C, Rémond, D 2002. Rumen digestion and intestinal nutrient flows in sheep consuming pea seeds: the effect of extrusion of chestnut tannin addition. Animal Research 51, 201206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, CR, Hatfield, EE 1978. The limiting amino acids in growing cattle. Journal of Animal Science 46, 740745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rondia, P, Froidmont, E, Beckers, Y, Decruyenaere, V and Bartiaux-Thill, N 2006. Effects of an additive enriched with the first limiting amino acids on growing performances of double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls fed a corn silage based diet. Conference at the 57th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Antalya, Turkey, 5pp.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 2004. SAS/STAT user’s guide version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Van Milgem, J 1995. Les conséquences de la dynamique de la digestion des aliments sur le métabolisme ruminal et les performances animales. INRA Productions Animales 8, 353367.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Perez, JM, Tran, G 2002. Tables de composition et de valeurs nutritives des matières premières destinées aux animaux d’élevage. INRA Editions, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Smith, DB, Roddick, JG, Jones, JL 1996. Potato glycoalkaloids: some unanswered questions. Trends in Food Science and Technology 7, 126131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storm, E, ∅rskov, ER 1984. The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. 4. The limiting amino acids of microbial protein in growing sheep determined by a new approach. The British Journal of Nutrition 52, 613620.Google Scholar
Taciak, M, Pastuszewska, B 2007. Potato protein concentrate – nutritional value and effect on gut morphology, ileal digestibility, and caecal fermentation in rats. In Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition (ed. I Ortigues-Marty, N Miraux and W Brand-Williams), pp. 627628. EAAP publication No. 124, Vichy, France.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S, Van Straalen, WM, Subnel, APJ, Meijer, RGM, Steg, A, Wever, CJG, Blok, MC 1994. The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40, 139155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titgemeyer, EC, Merchen, NR 1990. The effect of abomasal methionine supplementation on nitrogen retention of growing steers postruminally infused with casein or nonsulfur-containing amino acids. Journal of Animal Science 68, 750757.Google Scholar
Tuśnio, A, Pastuszewska, B, Święch, E, Buraczewska, L 2007. The effect of potato protein and potato fibre on amino acid digestibility, small intestinal structure and on N-balance and performance of young pigs. In Energy and protein metabolism and nutrition (ed. I Ortigues-Marty, N Miraux and W Brand-Williams), pp. 441442. EAAP publication No. 124, Vichy, France.Google Scholar
Valkeners, D, Théwis, A, Amant, S, Beckers, Y 2006. Effect of various levels of imbalance between energy and nitrogen release in the rumen on microbial protein synthesis and nitrogen metabolism in growing double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls fed a corn silage-based diet. Journal of Animal Science 84, 877885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Es, AJH, Van der Honing, Y 1977. Het nieuwe energetische voederwaarderingssysteem voor herkauwers: wijze van afleiding en uiteindelijk voorstel. Report IVVO 92, 148.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.Google Scholar
Veenhuizen, JJ, McGilliard, AD, Young, JW 1984. Apparatus for total collection of urine from steers. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 18651867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinn, RA, Shen, Y 1998. An evaluation of ruminally degradable intake protein and amino acid requirements of feedlot calves. Journal of Animal Science 76, 12801289.Google Scholar