Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:03:07.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-alimentation strategy to manoeuvre body condition and carcass characteristics in cull ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

R. S. Bhatt ,
N. M. Soren ,
A. Sahoo  and
S. A. Karim
R. S. Bhatt
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar, PO Box 304 501, Rajasthan, India
N. M. Soren
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar, PO Box 304 501, Rajasthan, India
A. Sahoo*
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar, PO Box 304 501, Rajasthan, India
S. A. Karim
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Avikanagar, PO Box 304 501, Rajasthan, India
*
†E-mail: sahooarta1@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Improvement in body condition and carcass traits through nutritional intervention was studied in cull ewes. Sixty-eight adult non-productive Malpura ewes (average body weight 26.7 ± 0.33 kg) were randomly divided into four equal groups: G0 maintained on free grazing for 8 h on protected natural rangeland with ad libitum guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) straw (GS) after grazing; G1, G2 and G3 fed with supplemental concentrate at the rate of 250 g, 2.5% of live weight (LW) and ad libitum, respectively. The experiment was continued for 90 days and daily feed intake, weekly LW and body condition score (BCS) were recorded. Intake and digestibility of nutrients were assessed by indicator method. Rumen fermentation attributes and blood biochemical profile were studied to assess the dietary effects and animals were slaughtered at the end of experiment for evaluation of carcass characteristics. Higher dry matter (DM) intake and improvement in plane of nutrition was observed in G2 and G3 with a higher LW gain (LWG) and improvement in BCS than in G0. The digestibility of DM, organic matter, CP, ADF and cellulose was higher (P < 0.05) in G2 and G3 than in G0. A lower ruminal pH and ammonia N but higher total N and trichloroacetic acid-precipitable N, an increase in holotrichs, spirotrichs and total protozoa population, increase in haemoglobin but decrease in serum total cholesterol and non-esterified fatty acids were observed in high-concentrate-fed groups. Carcass attributes revealed increase (P < 0.05) in empty LW, dressing yield, eye muscle area, subcutaneous and intramuscular fat, decrease in shear force value and higher (P < 0.05) protein content in Longissimus dorsi muscle in test groups than in the control. Above all, the G2 animals had better rumen environment and blood biochemical attributes and consumed more feed with enhanced digestibility that supported higher LWG at better feed conversion efficiency, improvement in BCS and carcass quality. Thus, re-alimentation of cull ewes with challenged feeding of concentrate at 2.5% of LW on a basal roughage diet for a period of 3 months may have promise for better economic return to the farmers with possibly meeting quality mutton for human consumption.

Keywords

cull ewesnutrient utilizationrumen and blood profilebody condition scorecarcass characteristics
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 61 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1995. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Australian Agriculture Council (AAC) 1990. Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock, Ruminant Subcommittee. CSIRO, Australian Agriculture Council, Eastern Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Baker, RD, Young, NE, Laws, JA 1985. Changes in the body composition of cattle exhibiting compensatory growth and the modifying effects of grazing management. Animal Production 41, 309–321.Google Scholar
Barnett, AJG, Reid, RL 1957. Studies on the production of volatile fatty acids from grass by rumen liquor in an artificial rumen. 1. The volatile acid production from fresh grass. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 48, 315–321.Google Scholar
Brossard, L, Martin, C, Durand, FC, Michalet-Doreau, B 2004. Protozoa involved in butyric rather than lactic fermentative pattern during latent acidosis in sheep. Reproduction Nutrition Development 44, 195–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A, Devant, M 2002. Effect of pH and pH fluctuations on microbial fermentation and nutrient flow from a dual-flow continuous culture system. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 574–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cannas, A, Tedeschi, LO, Fox, DG, Pell, AN, Van Soest, PJ 2004. A mechanistic model for predicting the nutrient requirements and feed biological values for sheep. Journal of Animal Science 82, 149–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carro, MD, Valdes, C, Ranilla, MJ, Gonzalez, JS 2000. Effect of forage to concentrate ratio in the diet on ruminal fermentation and digesta flow kinetics in sheep offered food at a fixed and restricted level of intake. Animal Science 70, 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaturvedi, OH, Sankhyan, SK, Mann, JS, Karim, SA 2008. Livestock holding pattern and feeding practices in semiarid eastern region of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 14, 224–229.Google Scholar
Chilliard, Y, Bocquier, F, Doreau, M 1998. Digestive and metabolic adaptations of ruminants to under nutrition, and consequences on reproduction. Reproduction Nutrition Development 38, 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, JD 1985. Measurement of iron status. A Report of the International Nutritional Anaemia Consultative Group, New York, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Dikmen, S, Ustuner, H, Turkmen, II, Ogan, M 2009. Fattening performance and feed source preference of native Awassi lambs fed individually in a cafeteria feeding system. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, DB 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, JM 2003. The multifactorial nature of food intake control. Journal of Animal Science 81 (Suppl. 2), E139–E144.Google Scholar
Fox, DG, Barry, MC, Pitt, RE, Roseler, DK, Stone, WC 1995. Application of the Cornell net carbohydrate and protein model for cattle consuming forages. Journal of Animal Science 73, 267–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimp, HA, Steven, PH, David, VT 1989. Effect of altering nutrient density (concentrate to roughage ratio) and restricting energy intake on rate, efficiency and composition of growing lambs. Journal of Animal Science 67, 865–871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ha, JK, Lindsay, RC 1991. Volatile alkylphenols and thiophenol in species related characterizing flavor of red meats. Journal of Food Science 56, 1197–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, LE 1967. Nutrient research technique for domestic and wild animals, vol. 1. Agricultural Services, Logan, UT, USA.Google Scholar
Hristov, AN, Ivan, M, Rode, LM, McAllister, TA 2001. Fermentation characteristics and ruminal ciliate protozoal population in cattle fed medium or high concentrate diets, Journal of Animal Science 79, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hood, RL, Thornton, RF 1980. The effect of compensatory growth on lipogenesis in ovine carcass adipose tissue. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, RH, Walker, PJ, Skerritt, JW, Davidson, RH, Hopkins, DL, Thompson, JM, Pethick, DW 2005. The effect of lairage time on consumer sensory scores of the M. longissimus thoracis et lumborum from lambs and lactating ewes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 535–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karim, SA, Tripathi, MK, Singh, VK 2007. Effect of varying levels of concentrate supplementation on growth performance and carcass traits of finisher lambs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19, 173.Google Scholar
Koenig, JM, Boling, JA, Bull, LS 1980. Energy and protein metabolism in ewes as influenced by age and dietary protein- calorie ratio. Journal of Animal Science 51, 1011–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopp, J, Bonnet, M 1987. Stress- strain and isometric tension measurements in collagen. In Advances in meat research, vol. 4. Collagen as a food (ed. AM Pearson and TR Dutson), pp. 163–185. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Krishna, N, Bhandari, DS, Patnayak, BC 1981. A double indicator method of determining dry matter intake and digestibility of nutrients in grazing sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 51, 716–719.Google Scholar
Mandebvu, P, Galbraith, H 1999. Effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation and variation in the proportion of barley and sugar beet pulp on growth performance and rumen, blood and carcass characteristics in young entire lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 82, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P, Edward, RA, Greenhalgh, JFDF, Morgan, CA 1996. Animal Nutrition. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, UK.Google Scholar
Mendiratta, SK, Kondaiah, N, Anjaneyulu, ASR, Sharma, BD 2008. Comparisons of handling practices of culled sheep meat for production of mutton curry. Asian–Australasian Journal of Animal Science 21, 738–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, PD, Smith, NB, Dobbie, PM, Smith, DR, Bown, MD 2001. Effects of growth path on beef quality in 18-month-old Angus and South Devon × Angus pasture-fed steers. Animal Science 72, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, JB, Van Soest, PJ 1981. The detergent systems of analysis. In The analysis of dietary fibre in food (ed. WPT James and O Theander), pp. 123–158. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Russel, AJF, Doney, JM, Gunn, RG 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 72, 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahoo, A, Agarwal, N, Kamra, DN, Chaudhary, LC, Pathak, NN 1999. Influence of the level of molasses in deoiled rice bran based concentrate mixture on rumen fermentation pattern in crossbred calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology 80, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankhyan, SK, Shinde, AK, Bhatta, R, Karim, SA 1999a. Comparison of diet and faecal methods for assessment of seasonal variation in dry matter intake by sheep maintained on Cenchrus pasture. Animal Feed Science and Technology 82, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankhyan, SK, Shinde, AK, Karim, SA 1999b. Seasonal changes in biomass yield, nutrient intake and its utilization by sheep maintained on public rangeland. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 69, 617–620.Google Scholar
Santra, A, Chaturvedi, OH, Tripathi, MK, Kumar, R, Karim, SA 2003. Effect of dietary sodium bicarbonate supplementation on fermentation characteristics and ciliate protozoal population in rumen of lambs. Small Ruminant Research 47, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipe, WF, Senyk, GF, Fountain, KB 1980. Modified copper soap solvent extraction method for measuring free fatty acids in milk. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriver, BJ, Hoover, WH, Sargent, JP, Crawford, RJ, Thaine, WV 1986. Fermentation of a high-concentrate diet as affected by ruminal pH and digesta flow. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skiba, G 2010. Effect of energy or protein restriction followed by realimentation on the composition of gain and meat quality characteristics of Musculus longissimus dorsi in pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition 64, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, GW, Cochran, WG 1989. Statistical methods, 8th edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MM, Ames, JM 1996. Free fatty acid composition of the adipose tissue of intact and castrated lambs slaughtered at 12 and 30 weeks of age. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44, 3113–3116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiruvenkadan, AK, Karunanithi, K, Puroshothaman, MR 2004. Socio-economic status of the Meecheri sheep farmers and economics of rearing under farmers’ management. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 10, 117–122.Google Scholar
Towne, G, Nagaraja, TG, Brandt, RT Jr, Kemp, KE 1990. Dynamics of Ruminal Ciliated Protozoa in Feedlot Cattle. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56, 3174–3178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trinder, P 1969. Determination of blood glucose using an oxidase–peroxidase system with a non-carcinogenic chromogen. Journal of Clinical Pathology 22, 158–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tripathi, MK, Chaturvedi, OH, Karim, SA, Singh, VK, Sisodiya, SL 2007. Effect of different levels of concentrate allowances on rumen fluid pH, nutrient digestion, nitrogen retention and growth performance of weaner lambs. Small Ruminant Research 72, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, MK, Santra, A, Chaturvedi, OH, Karim, SA 2004. Effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on ruminal fluid pH, feed intake, nutrient utilization and growth of lambs fed high concentrate diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 111, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods of dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weatherburn, MW 1967. Phenol hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39, 971–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, AG, Coleman, GS 1992. The Rumen Protozoa. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, E, Johnson, CB, Nixon, LN 1975. The contribution of 4- methylactanoic (hircinoic) acid to mutton and goat meat flavour. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wybenga, DR, Pilegg, VJ, Dirstine, PH, Giorgio, JD 1970. Direct manual determination of serum total cholesterol with a single stable reagent. Clinical Chemistry 16, 980–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, OA, Berdague, JL, Viallon, C, Rousset-Akrim, S, Theriez, M 1997. Fat borne volatiles and sheep meat odour. Meat Science 45, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar