Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:35:19.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whole inedible date in the grower–finisher broiler diets and the impact on productive performance, nutrient digestibility and meat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2010

A. A. El-Deek ,
Y. A. Attia  and
M. A. Al-Harthi
A. A. El-Deek
Affiliation:
Department of Arid Land Agriculture, Faculty of Meteorology Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
Y. A. Attia*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour Branch, Alexandria University, Damanhour 22516, Egypt
M. A. Al-Harthi
Affiliation:
Department of Arid Land Agriculture, Faculty of Meteorology Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
*
†E-mail: yfat_alexu40@hotmail.com
Get access

Abstract

The growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality measurements were evaluated on broiler chicks fed different dietary levels of whole inedible dates (WID). WID used in this study were consisted of date fruits (∼850 g/kg) and date pits (∼150 g/kg). Three hundred unsexed Lohman broiler chicks were randomly and equally distributed into six groups. Each was formed of 50 chicks (five replicates, 10 chicks per replicate), and was assigned to a dietary treatment. Six dietary treatments of WID (0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 g/kg feed) were included in the formation of isocaloric (metabolizable energy of ∼3060 kcal/kg feed) and isonitrogenous (CP of ∼192 g/kg feed) broiler rations. The treated rations were fed to the group chicks between 15 and 42 days of age (the experimental period). A straight-run design was considered. At 42 days of age, five males from each treatment were randomly chosen and slaughtered to determine carcass characteristics, internal organs and meat quality measurements. Digestibility of nutrients was measured at the end of the experimental period using five caged-individual males per treatment. The inclusion of broiler rations on WID for up to 150 g/kg feed, over the experimental period, did not significantly influence body weight gain (1452 to 1521 g/chick), feed intake (3268 to 3621 g/chick), feed conversion ratio (2.26 to 2.36 kg/kg) and dressed carcass (63.4% to 67.3%). In addition, levels of WID for up to 150 g/kg feed did not significantly influence the digestibility of nutrients and meat quality measurements. Such results suggest the possible inclusion of broiler rations on WID for up to 150 g/kg feed, during the period of 15 to 42 days of age without adverse effects on growth performance and meat quality.

Keywords

whole inedible datesbroilersgrowth performancemeat quality
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 10 , October 2010 , pp. 1647 - 1652
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afzal, N, Nafemipou, H, Riasi, A 2006. The effect of different levels of surplus date in grower and finisher diets on broiler performance. World’s Poultry Science Journal. Proceedings of the XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy. World’s Poultry Science supplement 62, 372–373.Google Scholar
Aggoor, FAM, Attia, YA, Qota, EMA 2000. A study on the energetic efficiency of different fat sources and levels in broiler chick vegetable diets. Mansoura University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25, 801–820.Google Scholar
Aitken, A, Casey, JC, Penny, IF, Volys, CA 1962. Effect of drying temperature in the accelerated freezes drying of pork. Journal Science Food Agriculture 13, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Homidan, AH 2003. Date waste, whole dates and date pits as ingredients in broiler diets. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal 23, 15–35.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Attia, YA, Böhmer Barbara, M, Roth-Maier Dora, A 2006. Responses of broiler chicks raised under constant relatively high ambient temperature to enzymes, amino acid supplementations, or diet density. Archiv Für Geflügelkunde 70, 80–91.Google Scholar
Carpenter, KL, Clegg, KM 1956. The metabolizable energy of poultry feeding stuffs in relation to their chemical composition. Journal Science food Agriculture 7, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daghir, N 2008. Poultry Production in hot climates, 2nd edition. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1999. Rome, Date Palm Cultivation. Retrieved August 20, 2005 from http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/006/Y4360E/y4360e00.htmGoogle Scholar
Farrell, D 2005. Matching poultry production with available fee resources: issues and constraints. World’s Poultry Science Journal 61, 298–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hmeidan, MCY, Al-Yousef, NH, Al-Turki, I 1993. Dates as an energy source in broiler rations. In Proceedings of the 3rd symposium of date palms, King Faisal University, pp. 401–413. Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia.Google Scholar
Husani, SA, Deatherage, FB, Kunlkle, LE 1950. Studies on meat. 11. Observations on relation of biochemical factors to change in tenderness. Feed Technology 4, 366–369.Google Scholar
Hussein, AS, Alhadrami, GA, Khalil, YH 1998. The use of dates and date pits in broiler starter and finisher diets. Bioresource Technology 66, 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, PE, Gertov, K, Nilsen, SH 1960. Frdjelighed frogmed fierbrae. “Digestibility trails with poultry”. Bereting fra for sogslabortoriet, Kabenhaven 56, 1–34.Google Scholar
Kamel, BS, Diab, MF, Ilian, MA, Salman, AJ 1981. Nutritional value of whole dates and date pits in broiler rations. Poultry Science 60, 1005–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumpkins, B, Batal, A 2005. Bioavailability of lysine and phosphorus in distillers’ dried grains with solubles. Poultry Science 84, 581–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council (NRC) 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute (SAS) 1990. In SAS/STAT user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sawaya, WN, Khalil, JK, Khatchadourian, HA, Safi, WM, Mashadi, AS 1983. Sugars, tannins and some vitamins contents of twenty-five date cultivars grown in Saudi Arabia at the Khalal (mature color) and Tamer (ripe stages). In Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on date palms in Saudi Arabia, pp. 468–477. Al-Hassa, Saudi Arabia.Google Scholar
Summers, JD 1984. The extra calorific value of fats in poultry diets. In Fats in Animal Nutrition (ed. J. Wiseman), pp. 265–276. Butterworths, London, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Światkiewicz, S, Korleski, J 2008. The use of distillers dried grains with soluble DDGS in poultry nutrition. World’s Poultry Science Journal 64, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandepopuliere, JM, Al-Yousef, Y, Lyons, JJ 1995. Dates and date pits as ingredients in broiler starting and Coturnix quail breeder diets. Poultry Science 74, 1134–1142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volovinskaia, VP, Kelman, BY 1962. Modification of the water holding capacity method of meat F.D. industry 11, 80, Moscow.Google Scholar