Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T08:52:55.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Among farm variation in heifer BW gains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2015

G. B. Bond ,
M. A. G. von Keyserlingk ,
N. Chapinal ,
E. A. Pajor  and
D. M. Weary
G. B. Bond
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, Canada, BC V6T 1Z4 Department of Production Animal Health, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Canada, AB T2N 4N1
M. A. G. von Keyserlingk
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, Canada, BC V6T 1Z4
N. Chapinal
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, Canada, BC V6T 1Z4
E. A. Pajor
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Health, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, Canada, AB T2N 4N1
D. M. Weary*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, Canada, BC V6T 1Z4
*
†E-mail: danweary@mail.ubc.ca
Get access

Abstract

BW of replacement heifers is rarely measured on commercial farms, making it difficult to evaluate the success of management practices related to calf growth. Our aims were to describe variability among commercial farms in Holstein heifer BW, determine how BW differences varied with management and propose a method of estimating calf growth based upon single measurement. Heart girth circumference was used to estimate BW of 576 heifers 48 to 70 weeks of age on 33 different farms (on average 11±6 heifers/farm) in British Columbia, Canada. Regression analysis showed a linear relationship of BW with age (BW (kg)=116+5×age (weeks)). Residuals from this regression were averaged across heifers within each farm to identify farms where heifers were heavier or lighter than would be predicted on the basis of their age; farm average residuals ranged from −54 to 72 kg. Farms with heifers showing the highest residual BW also had the highest rates of gain for pre-weaned calves. These results indicate that farms able to rear faster growing calves before weaning were also rearing faster growing heifers at breeding, and suggest that management of milk-fed calves is a particularly important component of replacement heifer management.

Keywords

growth trajectoryheifer managementdairy calfwelfare assessment
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 11 , November 2015 , pp. 1884 - 1887
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bach, A and Ahedo, J 2008. Record keeping and economics of dairy heifers. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 24, 117–138.Google ScholarPubMed
Bartlett KS, McKeith FK, Van de Haar MJ, Dahl GE and Drackley JK 2006. Growth and body composition of dairy calves fed milk replacers containing different amounts of protein at two feeding rates. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1454–1467.Google Scholar
Bøe, KE and Færevik, G 2003. Grouping and social preferences in calves, heifers and cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVries, TJ 2010. Review: behaviour and its role in the nutritional management of the growing dairy heifer. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 90, 295–302.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, AJ and Heinrichs, BS 2011. A prospective study of calf factors affecting first-lactation and lifetime milk production and age of cows when removed from the herd. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 336–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrichs, AJ, Rogers, GW and Cooper, JB 1992. Predicting body weight and wither height in Holstein heifers using body measurements. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 3576–3581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrichs, AJ, Erb, HN, Rogers, GW, Cooper, JB and Jones, CM 2007. Variability in Holstein heifer heart-girth measurements and comparison of prediction equations for live weight. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 78, 333–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinrichs, J and Lammers, B 1998. Monitoring dairy heifer growth. The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, USA. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Khan, MA, Weary, DM and von Keyserlingk, MAG 2011. Invited review: effects of milk ration on solid feed intake, weaning, and performance in dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 1071–1081.Google Scholar
Mohd Nor, N, Steeneveld, W, van Werven, T, Mourits, MCM and Hogeveen, H 2013. First-calving age and first-lactation milk production on Dutch dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 981–992.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture 2010. Dairy 2007 – heifer calf health and management practices on U.S. operations. USDA:APHIS, Fort Collins, CO, USA. 168 pp.Google Scholar
Van Amburgh ME, Galton DM, Bauman DE, Everett RW, Fox DG, Chase LE and Erb HN 1998. Effects of three prepubertal body growth rates on performance of Holstein Heifers during first lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 527–538.Google Scholar