Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:35:50.481Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of several factors of variation of gestation loss in breeding mares

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2012

B. Langlois ,
C. Blouin  and
S. Chaffaux
B. Langlois*
Affiliation:
INRA-CRJ, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France
C. Blouin
Affiliation:
INRA-CRJ, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France
S. Chaffaux
Affiliation:
INRA-CRJ, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas Cedex, France
*
†E-mail: bertrand.langlois@jouy.inra.fr
Get access

Abstract

The files for ultrasound diagnosis of gestating mares belonging to the French equine herd recorded for 3 consecutive years were joined with the files for foal birth of these same mares, allowing the statistical analysis of factors of pregnancy loss. For 28 872 positive diagnoses of gestation, 2898 losses were recorded, that is, a global rate of gestation interruption of 9.12%. The etiology of these interruptions is mainly extrinsic: the year and month of insemination, as well as region for climatic reasons. The intrinsic causes that are implicated are breed of the father (heavy breeds except the hypermetric ones lose fewer pregnancies than warm-blooded breeds), age of the mother (losses are lower in mares of 7 to 10 years of age) and status (mares with foals have fewer pregnancy losses than mares not having foaled the previous year), as well as fetuses with consanguinity (when this increases, the pregnancy losses increase as well). However, the additive genetic effect is extremely low; it corresponds to heritability below 5% and few effects of the environment, common to the offspring of the same mare, were identified. This therefore gives little hope of being able to select against the ‘gestation loss’ trait.

Keywords

horsegestation lossfactor of variationlogistic regression
Type
Breeding and genetics
Information
animal , Volume 6 , Issue 12 , December 2012 , pp. 1925 - 1930
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, WR, Brown, L, Wright, M, Wilsher, S 2007. Reproductive efficiency of Flat race and national Hunt Thoroughbred mares and stallions in England. Equine Veterinary Journal 39, 438–485.Google Scholar
Ball, BA, Hillman, RB, Woods, GL 1997. Survival of equine embryos transferred to normal and subfertile mares. Theriogenology 28, 167–174.Google Scholar
Boichard, D 2002. Pedig: a Fortran package for pedigree analysis suited for large populations. Conference at the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, August 19–23, Communication No. 28–13, 2pp.Google Scholar
Bruck, I, Anderson, GA, Hyland, JH 1993. Reproductive performance of Thoroughbred mares on six commercial stud farms. Australian Veterinary Journal 70, 299–303.Google Scholar
Chaffaux, S, Dugardin, D, Pitel, P-H, Hendrikx, P, Laugier, C, et Valon, F 2011. Création d'un réseau d’épidémiosurveillance des avortements, de la mortinatalité et de la mortalité néonatale infectieux et contagieux chez les équidés, en France. Bilan des deux premières années d'activité. Bulletin de l'Académie Vétérinaire de France 164, 119–126.Google Scholar
Chevalier, F, Palmer, E 1982. Ultrasonic echography in the mare. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (suppl. 32), 423–430.Google Scholar
Langlois, B, Blouin, C 2004. Statistical analysis of some factors affecting the number of horse births in France. Reproduction Nutrition Development 44, 583–595.Google Scholar
Morris, LHA, Allen, WR 2002. Reproductive efficiency of intensively managed Thoroughbred mares in Newmarket. Equine Veterinary Journal 34, 51–60.Google Scholar
Bilan et perspectives in Troisième journée du Réseau Economique de la Filière Equine (REFErence), Paris 19 janvier 2010. Retrieved from http://www.instelevage.asso.fr/html1/spip.php?page=article_espace&id_espace=930&id_article=16306Google Scholar
Sairanen, J, Nivola, K, Katila, T, Virtala, A-M, Ojala, M 2009. Effects of inbreeding and other genetic components on equine fertility. Animal 3, 1662–1672.Google Scholar
SAS Institute 2003. SAS/STAT software release 9.1.3 – PROC LOGISTIC, user's guide, SAS online doc 9.1 and PROC GENMOD, user's guide, SAS online doc 9.1.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sharma, S, Dhaliwal, GS, Dadarwal, D 2010. Reproductive efficiency of Thoroughbred mares under Indian subtropical conditions: a retrospective survey over 7 years. Animal Reproduction Science 117, 241–248.Google Scholar
Vanderwall, D 2008. Early embryonic loss in the mare. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 28, 691–702.Google Scholar
Yang, YJ, Cho, GJ 2007. Factors concerning early embryonic death in Thoroughbred mares in South Korea. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Science 69, 787–792.Google Scholar