Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:55:08.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of lifetime performance of small ruminants under different feeding systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2016

T. A. Amole ,
M. Zijlstra ,
K. Descheemaeker ,
A. A. Ayantunde  and
A. J. Duncan
T. A. Amole*
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), 01 BP 1496 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
M. Zijlstra
Affiliation:
Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
K. Descheemaeker
Affiliation:
Plant Production Systems, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands
A. A. Ayantunde
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), 01 BP 1496 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
A. J. Duncan
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
*
†E-mail: t.amole@cgiar.org
Get access

Abstract

Evaluation of lifetime productivity of individual animals in response to various interventions allows assessment of long-term investment opportunities for farmers. In order to gain a better understanding of promising feed interventions for improvement of small ruminant production in Southwestern Nigeria, a dynamic modelling approach was used to explore the effect of different feeding strategies on the lifetime productivity of West African Dwarf (WAD) goats. Modifications were made to the current version of Livestock Simulator developed for cattle production to simulate goat production systems particularly for WAD goats. Effects of changes in input parameters (quality of feed and potential adult weight) confirmed the sensitivity of the modelled weight development and reproductive performance. The values of simulated model outputs corresponded well with observed values for most of the variables, except for the pre-weaning mortality rate in the cut-and-carry system where a wide discrepancy between simulated (2.1%) and observed (23%) data was found. The scenario analysis showed that simulated goats in the free grazing system attained sexual maturity and kidded much later than those in the grazing with supplementation and the cut-and-carry systems. The simulated results suggested that goats require supplementation with protein and energy sources, in order to promote lifetime productivity, early sexual maturity and higher birth weight. In terms of economic returns based on feed cost alone, the moderately intense system produced the most profit. We therefore conclude that grazing with adequate supplementation using farm-generated feed resources offers an opportunity for improving smallholder goat production systems in West Africa.

Keywords

lifetime productivityfeeding systemssimulation modelWest African Dwarf goats
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , May 2017 , pp. 881 - 889
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abegunde, TO, Babayemi, OJ and Akinsoyinu, AO 2011. Nutritive value assessment of Ficus polita and Panicum maximum at varying proportions using an in vitro gas production method in the dry and wet seasons. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 10, 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adebambo, AO, Adebambo, O, Williams, JL, Blott, S and Urquart, B 2011. Genetic distance between two popular Nigerian goat breeds used for milk production. Livestock Research for Rural Development 23. Retrieved on 17 November 2014 from hhtp://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/2/adeb23026.htm.Google Scholar
Adjorlolo, LK, Timpong-Jones, EC, Boadu, S and Adogla-Bessa, T 2016. Potential contribution of neem (Azadirachta indica) leaves to dry season feeding of ruminants in West Africa. Livestock Research for Rural Development 28, Article No. 75. Retrieved on 4 July 2016 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/5/adjo28075.htm.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on response to nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Ajayi, DA, Adeneye, JA and Ajayi, FT 2005. Intake and nutrient utilization of West African dwarf goats fed mango (Mangifera indica), Ficus (Ficus thionningii), Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) foliages and concentrates as supplements to basal diet of guinea grass (Panicum maximum). World Journal of Agricultural Science 1, 184–189.Google Scholar
Ajayi, FT, Babayemi, OJ and Taiwo, AA 2007. Effects of Stylosanthes guianensis and Aeschynomene histrix on the yield, proximate composition and in-situ dry matter and crude protein degradation of Panicum maximum (Ntchisi). Livestock Research for Rural Development 19. Retrieved on 9 October 2014 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/3/ajay19032.htm.Google Scholar
Akinfemi A, Adesanya AO and Aya VE 2009. Use of an in vitro gas production technique to evaluate some Nigerian feedstuffs. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research 4, 240–245.Google Scholar
Amankwaha, K, Klerkx, L, Oosting, SJ, Sakyi-Dawsond, O, van der Zijppc, AJ and Millar, D 2012. Diagnosing constraints to market participation of small ruminant producers in northern Ghana: an innovation systems analysis. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 60–63, 37–47.Google Scholar
Amole, TA, Oduguwa, BO, Shittu, O, Famakinde, A, Okwelum, N, Ojo, VOA, Dele, PA, Idowu, OJ, Ogunlolu, B and Adebiyi, AO 2013. Herbage yield and quality of Lablab purpureus during the late dry season in western Nigeria. Slovak Journal of Animal Science 46, 22–30.Google Scholar
An, LV 2004. Sweet potato leaves for growing pigs: biomass yield, digestion and nutritive value. PhD, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Anaeto, M, Tayo, G O, Chioma, G O, Ajao, A O and Peters, T A 2009. Health and nutrition practices among smallholder sheep and goat farmers in Ogun State Nigeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development 21, Article No. 197. Retrieved on 24 July 2016 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/11/anae21197.htm.Google Scholar
Anandan, S, Ayantunde, AA, Okike, I, Babayemi, OJ, Sosina, AO and Duncan, AJ 2014. Assessment of livestock feed value chain in Ido and Ogo Oluwa local government areas, Oyo state, Nigeria. Retrieved on 15 July 2016 from http://ilri-humidtropics.wikispaces.com/file/view/oyo_feedvc_dec2014.pdf/546149870/oyo_feedvc_dec2014.pdf.Google Scholar
Asaolu, V, Binuomote, R, Akinlade, J, Aderinola, O and Oyelami, O 2012. Intake and growth performance of West African Dwarf goats fed Moringa oleifera, Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala dried leaves as supplements to cassava peels. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 2, 76–88.Google Scholar
Asaolu, VO and Odeyinka, SM 2006. Performance of West African Dwarf sheep fed cassava peel-based diets. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 33, 230–238.Google Scholar
Avornyo, FK, Ayantunde, A, Shaibu, M, Konlan, S and Karbo, N 2015. The effect of feed and health packages on the performance of village small ruminants in northern Ghana. International Journal of Livestock Research 5, 91–98.Google Scholar
Ayantunde, AA 1994. Design and validation of a simulation model for small ruminants in smallholder livestock systems. MSc thesis, Department of Tropical Animal production, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Baah, J, Tuah, AK, Addah, W and Tait, RM 2012. Small ruminant production characteristics in urban households in Ghana. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24, Article No. 86. Retrieved on 4 July 2016 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/5/baah24086.htm.Google Scholar
Barrett, CB 2008. Smallholder market participation: concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy 33, 299–317.Google Scholar
Belay, S, Gebru, G, Godifey, G, Brhane, M, Zenebe, M, Hagos, H and Teame, T 2014. Reproductive performance of Abergelle goats and growth rate of their crosses with Boer goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development 26, Article No. 5. Retrieved on 24 July 2016 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/1/bela26005.htm.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Y and Mekhon, V 1983. A management model of grassland sheep system under Israeli conditions. Bet Dagan, http://www.worldcat.org/title/management-model-of-grassland-sheep-system-under-israeli-conditions/oclc/610437411.Google Scholar
Bernués, A and Herrero, M 2008. Farm intensification and drivers of technology adoption in mixed dairy-crop systems in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 279–293.Google Scholar
Blackburn HD and Cartwright TC 1987. Description and validation of the Texas A&M sheep simulation model. Journal of Animal Science 65, 373–386.Google Scholar
Bosman, HG, Ayantunde, AA, Steenstra, FA and Udo, HMJ 1997. A simulation model to assess productivity of goat production in the tropics. Agricultural Systems 54, 539–576.Google Scholar
Bosman, HG and Ayeni, AO 1993. Zootechnical assessment of innovations as adapted and adopted by the goat keepers. In Proceedings of a workshop on Goat Production Systems in the Humid Tropics, 6–9 July 1992, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, Nigeria, pp. 45–57. Retrieved on 8 October 2015 from library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/23991.Google Scholar
Byerlee, D, Stevenson, J and Villoria, N 2014. Does intensification slow crop land expansion or encourage deforestation? Global Food Security 3, 92–98.Google Scholar
Chah, JM, Obi, UP and Ndofor-Foleng, HM 2013. Management practices and perceived training needs of small ruminant farmers in Anambra State, Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 2713–2721.Google Scholar
Chiboka, O, Somade, B and Montsma, G 1988. Reproduction of West African Dwarf goats: a summary of research work at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. In Proceedings of a workshop on Goat Production in the Humid Tropics, 20–24 July, University of Ife, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, pp. 21–28. Retrieved on 15 July 2016 from http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=NL880103788.Google Scholar
Chiejina, SN and Behnke, JM 2011. The unique resistance and resilience of the Nigerian West African Dwarf goat to gastrointestinal nematode infections. Parasites Vectors 4, 10.1186/1756-3305-4-12.Google Scholar
Debele, G, Duguma, M and Hundessa, F 2011. Effect of different factors on mortality rate of Arsi- Bale kids in mid rift valley of Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 6, 56–60.Google Scholar
Dereje, T, Mengistu, U, Getachew, A and Yoseph, M 2015. A review of productive and reproductive characteristics of indigenous goats in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 27, Retrieved on 22 July 2015 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/2/dere27034.html.Google Scholar
Dossa, LH, Rischkowsky, B, Birner, R and Wollny, C 2008. Market potential for the local Djallonké goat in Southern Benin: empirical evidence from two rural markets. Livestock Research for Rural Development 20, Article 78.Google Scholar
Dove, H 1996. Constraints to the modelling of diet selection and intake in the grazing ruminant. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, DB 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics 11, 1–42.Google Scholar
Fasae, OA, Adesope, AI and Ojo, VOA 2011. The effect of Leucaena leaf supplementation to maize residues on village goat performance. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 10, 1276–1282.Google Scholar
Flint, M 2005. Management guide for lot feeding goats. Retrieved on 29 June 2015 from http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/sheep/15153.html.Google Scholar
Franzel, S, Carsan, S, Lukuyu, B, Sinja, J and Wambugu, C 2014. Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6, 98–103.Google Scholar
Giller, KE, Tittonell, P, Rufino, MC, van Wijk, MT, Zingore, S, Mapfumo, P, Adjei-Nsiah, S, Herrero, M, Chikowo, R, Corbeels, M, Rowe, EC, Baijukya, F, Mwijage, A, Smith, J, Yeboah, E, van der Burg, WJ, Sanogo, OM, Misiko, M, de Ridder, N, Karanja, S, Kaizzi, C, K’ungu, J, Mwale, M, Nwaga, D, Pacini, C and Vanlauwe, B 2011. Communicating complexity: integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agricultural Systems 104, 191–203.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J, Ae Kim, S and Paudel, K 2007. Why don’t producers adopt best management practices? An analysis of the beef cattle industry. Agricultural Economics 36, 89–102.Google Scholar
Gimenez, D and Rodning, S 2007. Reproductive management of sheep and goats. Retrieved on 27 February 2015 from http://www.ace.edu/pubs/docs/A/ANR-1316.Google Scholar
Gusha, J, Ngongoni, NT and Halimani, T 2013. Nutritional composition and effective degradability of four forage trees grown for protein supplementation. Online Journal of Animal Feed Research 3, 170–175.Google Scholar
Heuzé, V, Tran, G 2015. Gliricidia (Gliricidia sepium) feedipedia, a grogramme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. Retrieved on 11 May 2015 from http://www.feedipedia.org/node/552 .Google Scholar
Hounkonnou, D, Kossou, D, Kuyper, TW, Leeuwis, C, Nederlof, ES, Röling, N, Sakyi-Dawson, O, Traoré, M and van Huis, A 2012. An innovation systems approach to institutional change: smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems 108, 74–83.Google Scholar
Ifut, OJ 1988. The potential of cassava peel for feeding goats in Nigeria. In Proceedings of the IITA/ILCA/University of Ibadan workshop on the Potential Utilization of Cassava as Livestock Feed in Africa, 14–18 November, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, pp. 72–81. Retrieved on 8 February 2016 from http://www.fao.org/wairdocs/ILRI/x5458E/x5458e0a.htm.Google Scholar
Kalio, GA, Ayuk, AA and Agwunobi, LN 2013. Performance and economics of production of West African Dwarf (WAD) bucks fed crop by-products as sole feed in Cross River State, Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1, 81–87.Google Scholar
Lawal-Adebowale, OA 2012. Dynamics of ruminant livestock management in the context of the Nigerian agricultural system. In Livestock production (ed. K. Javed), pp. 61–80. InTech, Croatia. Retrieved on http://www.intechopen.com/books/livestock-production/dynamics-of-ruminant-livestock-management-in-the-context-of-the-nigerian-agricultural-system.Google Scholar
Mako, AA, Akinwande, VO and Oyegunwa, AS 2013. Nutritive value assessment of the alternative feed resources using gas fermentation techniques and acceptability by WAD goats. International Journal of Agricultural Science 3, 365–371.Google Scholar
Mpairwe, DR, Sabiiti, EN, Ummuna, NN, Tegegne, A and Osuji, P 2002. Effect of intercropping cereal crops with forage legumes and source of nutrients on cereal grain yield and fodder dry matter yields. African Crop Science Journal 10, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngongoni, NT, Mwale, M, Mapiye, C, Moyo, MT, Hamudikuwanda, H and Titterton, M 2007. Evaluation of cereal-legume intercropped forages for smallholder dairy production in Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19, Article No. 129. Retrieved on 6 July 2016 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/9/ngon19129.htm.Google Scholar
Nnadi, PA, Kamalua, TN and Onah, DN 2007. Effect of dietary protein supplementation on performance of West African Dwarf (WAD) does during pregnancy and lactation. Small Ruminant Research 71, 200–204.Google Scholar
National Research Council 1981. Nutrient requirements of goats: angora, dairy and meat goats in temperate and tropical countries. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nwafor, CU 2004. Anthelmintics use for small ruminant production in the Gambia: a participatory and economic benefit-cost analysis. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16, Article 68.Google Scholar
Odeyinka, SM 2000. Feeding behaviour and diet selection by West African Dwarf goats. Archiv Tierzucht Dummerstorf 43, 57–61.Google Scholar
Odeyinka, SM and Torimiro, DO 2006. Assessment of adoption status of management practices for West African Dwarf goat production in Southwestern Nigeria. Tropicultura 24, 162–168.Google Scholar
Okafor, EC, Lakpini, CAM and Fayomi, A 2012. Dried Gmelina (Gmelina arborea roxb) leaves as replacement forage to groundnut haulms in the diet of fattening Red Sokoto bucks. International Journal of Agriculture and Bioscience 1, 5–10.Google Scholar
Olanite, JA, Tarawali, SA and Aken’ova, ME 2004. Biomass yield, quality and acceptability of selected grass-legume mixtures in the moist savanna of West Africa. Tropical Grasslands 38, 117–128.Google Scholar
Omeke, BCO 1988. Improving goat productivity in the humid zone of the tropics. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 36, 126–130.Google Scholar
Oosting, SJ, Udo, HMJ and Viets, TC 2014. Development of livestock production in the tropics: farm and farmers’ perspectives. Animal 8, 1238–1248.Google Scholar
Rufino, MC, Herrero, M, Van Wijk, MT, Hemerik, L, De Ridder, N and Giller, KE 2009. Lifetime productivity of dairy cows in smallholder farming systems of the Central highlands of Kenya. Animal 3, 1044–1056.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System 1999. User guide. Statistical Analysis Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Steele, M 2006. Goats. CTA-Macmillan Publishing Ltd, London and Basingstoke. 152 pp.Google Scholar
Umunna, MO, Olafadehan, OA and Arowon, A 2014. Small ruminant production and management systems in urban area of southern guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural and Food Science 2, 107–114.Google Scholar
Upton, M 1988. Goat production in the humid tropics – actual and potential contribution to agricultural development. In Proceedings of a workshop on Goat Production in the Humid Tropics, 20–24 July, University of Ife, Ile-Ife, Nigeria, pp. 21–28.Google Scholar
Whitbread, A, Robertson, M, Carberry, P and Dimes, J 2010. How farming systems simulation can aid the development of more sustainable smallholder farming systems in southern Africa. European Journal of Agronomy 32, 51–58.Google Scholar
Yousuf, MB, Belewu, MA, Daramola, JO and Ogundun, NI 2007. Protein supplementary values of cassava, leucaena and gliricidia leaf meals in goats fed low quality Panicum maximum hay. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19, Article No. 23. Retrieved on 30 October 2014 from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/2/yous19023.htm.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Amole supplementary material

Amole supplementary material 1

Download Amole supplementary material(File)
File 21.9 KB