Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:40:45.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Birth weight and postnatal dietary protein level affect performance, muscle metabolism and meat quality in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2011

P. M. Nissen  and
N. Oksbjerg
P. M. Nissen
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
N. Oksbjerg*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Food Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
*
† E-mail: Niels.Oksbjerg@Agrsci.dk
Get access

Abstract

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), resulting in low birth body weight (LBW) occurs naturally in pigs. However, IUGR may also cause persistent changes in physiology and metabolism resulting in poorer performance, organogenesis and meat quality. As IUGR pigs have a lower daily gain from birth to slaughter they may differ in utilization of nutrients and requirements for dietary protein compared with their larger littermates. Thus, the objective in this study was to examine the interaction between birth body weight (BW) and the postnatal dietary protein level, in relation to postnatal performance, organogenesis, muscle metabolism and meat quality. The experiment was carried out with offspring from 16 purebred Danish Landrace gilts mated to Danish Landrace boars. The female and entire male pigs with LBW that survived at weaning were compared with the female and male pigs with the highest/high birth body weight (HBW) within each litter. The offspring were reared individually from weaning and were fed ad libitum a diet containing either a normal level of protein (NP) for optimal growth or an isocaloric diet containing a 30% lower protein content (LP) from 3 weeks to 150 days of age. At slaughter, we found no interactions between birth weight group and dietary protein level for any of the measured traits. The relative crown–rump length (cm/kg) at birth indicates that LBW pigs were thinner than HBW pigs. Daily gain and feed intake were reduced by 14% and 10%, respectively, while the kg feed/kg gain was slightly increased by 3% in LBW pigs compared with HBW pigs. The LP diet reduced daily gain by 27% due to reduced feed intake and increased kg feed/kg gain by 12% and 21%, respectively compared with the NP diet. LBW male pigs produced meat with a higher shear force than male HBW pigs and also LP pigs produced meat with higher shear force than NP pigs. The activity of lactate dehydrogenase in the Longissimus dorsi muscle (LD) was reduced in pigs fed the LP diet. Calpastatin was increased in LD of LBW pigs and decreased in pigs fed the NP diet. In conclusion, these results suggest a rejection of our hypothesis that low birth weight littermates have a lower requirement for dietary protein compared with heavy weight littermates. Furthermore, LBW male pigs and LP fed pigs of both genders produced less tender meat than HBW pigs or NP fed pigs, respectively.

Keywords

performancemusclemeatmetabolism
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 5 , Issue 9 , 05 August 2011 , pp. 1382 - 1389
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bérard, J, Kreuzer, M, Bee, G 2008. Effect of litter size and birth weight on growth, carcass and pork quality, and their relationship to post-mortem proteolysis. Journal of Animal Science 86, 2357–2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, RG, Taverner, MR, Curic, DM 1984. Effect of feeding level and dietary protein content on the growth, body composition and rate of protein deposition in pigs growing from 45 to 90 kg. Animal Production 38, 233–240. doi:10.1017/S0003356100002221.Google Scholar
Chen, H-Y, Lewis, AJ, Miller, PS, Yen, JT 1999. The effect of excess protein on growth performance and protein metabolism of finishing barrows and gilts. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3238–3247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, M, Zhu, MJ, Means, WJ, Hess, BW, Ford, SP 2004. Effect of nutrient restriction on calpain and calpastatin content of skeletal muscle from cows and foetuses. Journal of Animal Science 82, 2541–2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, CM, Fletcher, JM, Stickland, NC 1993. Muscle cellularity and postnatal growth in the pig. Journal of Animal Science 71, 3339–3343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freathy, RM, Bennett, AJ, Ring, SM, Shields, B, Groves, CJ, Timpson, NJ, Weedon, MN, Zeggini, E, Lindgren, CM, Lango, H, Perry, JRB, Pouta, A, Ruokomem, A, Hyppönen, E, Power, C, Elliott, P, Strachan, DP, Järvelin, MR, Smith, GD, McCarthy, MI, Fraling, TM, Hattersley, AT 2009. Type 2 diabetes risk alleles are associated with reduced size at birth. Diabetes 58, 1428–1433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfrey, KM, Barker, JP 2000. Fetal nutrition and adult disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 71, 1344S–1352S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goerl, KF, Eilert, SJ, Mandigo, RW, Chen, HY, Miller, PS 1995. Pork characteristics as affected by two populations of swine and six crude protein levels. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3621–3626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gondret, F, Lefaucheur, L, Juin, H, Louveau, I, Lebret, B 2006. Low birth weight is associated with enlarged muscle fiber area and impaired meat tenderness of the longissimus muscle in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84, 93–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinson, RB, Schinckel, AP, Radcliffe, JS, Allee, GL, Sutton, AL, Richert, BT 2009. Effect of feeding reduced crude protein and phosphorus diets on weaning–finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and bone characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1502–1517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honikel, KO 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science 49, 447–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamalakar, RB, Chiba, LI, Divakala, KC, Rodning, SP, Welles, EG, Bergen, WG, Kerth, CR, Kuhlers, DL, Nadarajah, NK 2009. Effect of the degree and duration of early dietary amino acid restrictions on subsequent and overall pig performance and physical and sensory characteristics of pork. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3596–3606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, BJ, Yen, JT, Nienaber, JA, Easter, RA 2003. Influences of dietary protein level, amino acid supplementation and environmental temperature on performance, body composition, organ weights and total heat production of growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 1998–2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koohmaraie, M, Kent, MP, Shackelford, SD, Veiseth, E, Wheeler, TL 2002. Meat tenderness and muscle growth: is there any relationship? Meat Science 62, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lösel, D, Kalbe, C, Rehfeldt, C 2009. l-Carnitine supplementation during suckling intensifies the early postnatal skeletal myofiber formation in piglets of low birth weight. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2216–2226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millet, S, Ongenae, E, Hesta, M, Seynaeve, M, De Smet, S, Janssens, GJ 2006. The feeding of ad libitum dietary protein to organic growing–finishing pigs. Veterinary Journal 171, 483–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milligan, BN, Fraser, D, Kramer, DL 2002. Within-litter birth weight variation in the domestic pig and its relation to pre-weaning survival, weight gain, and variation in weaning diets. Livestock Production Science 76, 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morise, A, Louveau, I, Le Huërou-Luron, I 2008. Growth and development of adipose tissue and gut and related endocrine status during early growth in the pig: impact of low birth weight. Animal 2, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, AJ 1981. Analysis of Warner–Bratzler shear pattern with regard to myofibrillar and connective tissue components of tenderness. Meat Science 5, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, PM, Jorgensen, PF, Oksbjerg, N 2004. Within-litter variation in muscle fiber characteristics, pig performance, and meat quality. Journal of Animal Science 82, 414–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, PM, Pedersen, B, Therkildsen, M, Oksbjerg, N 2009. Pig meat quality predicted by growth rate at farm level. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 59, 167–172.Google Scholar
Oksbjerg, N, Henckel, P, Rolph, T, Erlandsen, E 1994. Effects of salbutamol, a β2-adrenergic agonist, on muscles of growing pigs fed different levels of dietary protein. II. Aerobic- and glycolytic capacities and glycogen metabolism of the longissimus dorsi muscle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 43, 20–24.Google Scholar
Oksbjerg, N, Petersen, JS, Sorensen, MT, Henckel, P, Agergaard, N 1995. The influence of porcine growth hormone on muscle fibre characteristics, metabolic potential and meat quality. Meat Science 39, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, PH, Oksbjerg, N, Karlsson, AH, Busk, H, Bendixen, E, Henckel, P 2001. A within litter comparison of muscle fibre characteristics and growth of halothane carrier and halothane free crossbreed pigs. Livestock Production Science 73, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehfeldt, C, Tuchscherer, A, Hartung, M, Kuhn, G 2008. A second look at the influence of birth weight on carcass and meat quality in pigs. Meat Science 78, 170–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruusunen, M, Partanen, K, Pösö, R, Puolanne, E 2007. The effect of dietary protein supply on carcass composition, size of organs, muscle properties and meat quality of pigs. Livestock Science 107, 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therkildsen, M 2005. Muscle protein degradation in bull calves with compensatory growth. Livestock Production Science 98, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therkildsen, M, Vestergaard, M, Busk, H, Jensen, MT, Riis, B, Karlsson, AH, Kristensen, L, Ertbjerg, P, Aaslyng, M, Oksbjerg, N 2004. Compensatory growth in slaughter pigs – in vitro muscle protein turnover at slaughter, circulating IGF-I, performance and carcass quality. Livestock Production Science 88, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, VF, Saldaña, S, Cong, J, Goll, DE 2000. A bodipy fluorescent microplate assay for measuring activity of calpains and other porteases. Analytical Biochemistry 279, 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, G, Bazer, JN, Wallece, JM, Spencer, TE 2006. Board-invited review: intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences. Journal of Animal Science 84, 2316–2337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed