Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:17:38.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calm Merino ewes have a higher ovulation rate and more multiple pregnancies than nervous ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2017

E. van Lier ,
K. W. Hart ,
C. Viñoles ,
B. Paganoni  and
D. Blache
E. van Lier*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Avda. Garzón 780, Montevideo 12900, Uruguay Estación Experimental Facultad de Agronomía Salto, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Ruta 31, km 21, Salto 50009, Uruguay School of Animal Biology M085, UWA Institute of Agriculture M082, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
K. W. Hart
Affiliation:
School of Animal Biology M085, UWA Institute of Agriculture M082, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia Ewetopia Consulting, Narrogin, WA 6312, Australia
C. Viñoles
Affiliation:
School of Animal Biology M085, UWA Institute of Agriculture M082, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia INIA Tacuarembó, Ruta 5 Km 386, Tacuarembó 45000, Uruguay
B. Paganoni
Affiliation:
School of Animal Biology M085, UWA Institute of Agriculture M082, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, WA 6151, Australia
D. Blache
Affiliation:
School of Animal Biology M085, UWA Institute of Agriculture M082, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
*
†E-mail: evanlier@fagro.edu.uy
Get access

Abstract

In 1990, two selection lines of Merino sheep were established for low and high behavioural reactivity (calm and nervous temperament) at the University of Western Australia. Breeding records consistently showed that calm ewes weaned 10% to 19% more lambs than the nervous ewes. We hypothesise that calm ewes could have a higher ovulation rate than nervous ewes and/or calm ewes could have a lower rate of embryo mortality than nervous ewes. We tested these hypotheses by comparing the ovulation rate and the rate of embryo mortality between the calm and nervous lines before and after synchronisation and artificial insemination. Merino ewes from the temperament selection lines (calm, n=100; nervous, n=100) were synchronised (early breeding season) for artificial insemination (day 0) (intravaginal sponges containing fluogestone acetate and eCG immediately after sponge withdrawal). On day-17 and 11 ovarian cyclicity and corpora lutea, and on days 30 and 74 pregnancies and embryos/foetuses were determined by ultrasound. Progesterone, insulin and leptin concentrations were determined in blood plasma samples from days 5, 12 and 17. Ovarian cyclicity before and after oestrus synchronisation did not differ between the lines, but ovulation rate did (day-17: calm 1.63; nervous 1.26; P<0.01; day 11: calm 1.83; nervous 1.57; P<0.05). Ovulation rate on day 11 in nervous ewes was higher than on day-17. Loss of embryos by day 30 was high (calm: 71/150; nervous: 68/130); but nervous ewes had a lower proportion (15/47) of multiple pregnancies compared with calm ewes (30/46; P<0.01). Reproductive loss between days 30 and 74 represented 7.3% of the overall loss. Temperament did not affect concentrations of progesterone, but nervous ewes had higher insulin (32.0 pmol/l±1.17 SEM; P=0.013) and lower leptin (1.18 μg/l±0.04 SEM; P=0.002) concentrations than calm ewes (insulin: 27.8 pmol/l±1.17 SEM; leptin: 1.35 μg/l±0.04 SEM). The differences in reproductive outcomes between the calm and nervous ewes were mainly due to a higher ovulation rate in calm ewes. We suggest that reproduction in nervous ewes is compromised by factors leading up to ovulation and conception, or the uterine environment during early pregnancy, that reflect differences in energy utilisation.

Keywords

embryoprogesteroneinsulinleptinOvis aries
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 7 , July 2017 , pp. 1196 - 1202
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamiak, SJ, Mackie, K, Watt, RG, Webb, R and Sinclair, KD 2005. Impact of nutrition on oocyte quality: cumulative effects of body composition and diet leading to hyperinsulinemia in cattle. Biology of Reproduction 73, 918–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashworth, CJ 1995. Maternal and conceptus factors affecting histotrophic nutrition and survival of embryos. Livestock Production Science 44, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickell, SL, Durmic, Z, Blache, D, Vercoe, PE and Martin, GB 2010a. Rethinking the management of health and reproduction in small ruminants. In Proceedings of the 26th World Buiatrics Congress, updates on ruminant production and medicine, 14–17 November 2010, Santiago, Chile, pp. 317–325.Google Scholar
Bickell, SL, Poindron, P, Nowak, R, Ferguson, DM and Blache, D 2010b. Maternal behaviour at parturition in outdoor conditions differs only moderately between single bearing ewes selected for their calm or nervous temperament. Animal Production Science 50, 675–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blache, D and Bickell, SL 2010. Temperament and reproductive biology: emotional reactivity and reproduction in sheep. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blache, D, Chagas, LM and Martin, GB 2007. Nutritional inputs into the reproductive neuroendocrine control system – a multidimensional perspective. Society of Reproduction and Fertility Supplement 64, 123–139.Google ScholarPubMed
Blache, D, Tellam, R, Chagas, LM, Blackberry, MA, Vercoe, PV and Martin, GB 2000. Level of nutrition affects leptin concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in sheep. Journal of Endocrinology 165, 625–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breen, KM, Billings, HJ, Wagenmaker, ER, Wessinger, EW and Karsch, FJ 2005. Endocrine basis for disruptive effects of cortisol on preovulatory events. Endocrinology 146, 2107–2112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockrem, JF 2013. Individual variation in glucocorticoid stress responses in animals. General and Comparative Endocrinology 181, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, RH, Fergani, C, Roulty, JE and Smith, RF 2012. Effects of stress on reproduction in ewes. Animal Production Science 130, 135–140.Google ScholarPubMed
Doney, JM, Gunn, RG, Smith, WF and Carr, WR 1976. Effects of pre-mating environmental stress, ACTH, cortisone acetate or metyrapone on oestrus and ovulation in sheep. The Journal of Agricultural Science 87, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelez, H, Lindsay, DR, Blache, D, Martin, GB and Fabe-Nys, C 2003. Temperament and sexual experience affect female sexual behaviour in sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 8, 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafez, ESE and Lindsay, DR 1965. Behavioral responses in farm animals and their relevance to research technique. Animal Breeding Abstracts 33, 1–16.Google Scholar
Haresign, W 1985. The physiological basis for variation in ovulation rate and litter size in sheep: a review. Livestock Production Science 13, 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, K, Chadwick, A, Sèbe, F, Poindron, P, Nowak, R and Blache, D 2006. Colostrum quality of ewes of calm temperament this not responsible for low lamb mortality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 827–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawken, PA, Luckins, N, Tilbrook, AJ, Fiol, C, Martin, GB and Blache, D 2013. Genetic selection for temperament affects behaviour and the secretion of adrenal and reproductive hormones in sheep subjected to stress. Stress 16, 130–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawken, PAR, Williman, M, Milton, J, Kelly, R, Nowak, R and Blache, D 2012. Nutritional supplementation during the last week of gestation increased the volume and reduced the viscosity of colostrum produced by twin bearing ewes selected for nervous temperament. Small Ruminant Research 105, 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferies, BC 1961. Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19–21.Google Scholar
Kendall, NR, Guitierrez, CG, Scaramuzzi, RJ, Baird, DT, Webb, R and Campbell, BK 2004. Direct in vivo effects of leptin on ovarian steroidogenesis in sheep. Reproduction 128, 757–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koolhaas, JM, de Boer, SF, Coppens, CM and Buwalda, B 2010. Neuroendocrinology of coping styles: towards understanding the biology of individual variation. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 31, 307–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krisher, RL 2004. The effect of oocyte quality on development. Journal of Animal Science 82, E14–E23.Google ScholarPubMed
Murphy, PM 1999. Maternal behaviour and rearing ability of Merino ewes can be improved by strategic feed supplementation during late pregnancy and selection for calm temperament. PhD thesis, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
Murphy, PM, Purvis, IW, Lindsay, DR, Le Neindre, P, Orgeur, P and Poindron, P 1994. Measures of temperament are highly repeatable in Merino sheep and some are related to maternal behaviour. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 20, 247–250.Google Scholar
Murray, TL, Blache, D and Bencini, R 2009. The selection of dairy sheep on calm temperament before milking and its effect on management and milk production. Small Ruminant Research 87, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, EO 2002. Social environment. In Animal domestication and behavior (ed. EO Price), pp. 320. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietema, SE, Blackberry, MA, Maloney, SK, Martin, GB, Hawken, PAR and Blache, D 2015. Twenty-four-hour profiles of metabolic and stress hormones in sheep selected for a calm or nervous temperament. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 53, 78–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sart, S, Bencini, R, Blache, D and Martin, GB 2004. Calm ewes produce milk with more protein than nervous ewes. Animal Production Australia 25, 307.Google Scholar
Scaramuzzi, RJ, Baird, DT, Campbell, BK, Driancourt, MA, Dupont, J, Fortune, JE, Gilchrist, RB, Martin, GB, McNatty, KP, McNeilly, AS, Monget, P, Monniaux, D, Viñoles, C and Webb, R 2011. Regulation of folliculogenesis and the determination of ovulation rate in ruminants. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 23, 444–467.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Setchell, BP 1992. Domestication and reproduction. Animal Reproduction Science 28, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, C, Abecia, JA, Forcada, F, Viñoles, C, Tasende, C, Valares, JA, Palacín, A, Martin, GB and Meikle, A 2006. Effect of undernutrition on uterine progesterone and oestrogen receptors and on endocrine profiles during the ovine oestrous cycle. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 18, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Susmel, P and Piasentier, E 1992. Assessment of pregnancy in Bergamasca ewes by analysis of plasma progesterone. Small Ruminant Research 8, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tindal, JS, Knaggs, GS, Hart, IC and Blake, LA 1978. Release of growth hormone in lactating and non-lactating goats in relation to behaviour, stages of sleep, electroencephalograms, environmental stimuli and levels of prolactin, insulin, glucose and free fatty acids in the circulation. Journal of Endocrinology 76, 333–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viñoles, C, Glover, KMM, Paganoni, BL, Milton, JTB and Martin, GB 2012. Embryo losses in sheep during short-term nutritional supplementation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 24, 1040–1047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viñoles, C, Gonzalez de Bulnes, A, Martin, GB, Sales, F and Sale, S 2010a. Chapter 11: Sheep and goats. In Atlas of ruminant and camelid reproductive ultrasonography (ed. L Des Côteaux, J Colloton and G Gnemi), pp. 181–210. Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, IA, USA.Google Scholar
Viñoles, C, Paganoni, B, Glover, KMM, Milton, JTB, Blache, D, Blackberry, MA and Martin, GB 2010b. The use of a ‘first-wave’ model to study the effect of nutrition on ovarian follicular dynamics and ovulation rate in the sheep. Reproduction 140, 865–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar