Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:17:40.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Castration of piglets under CO2-gas anaesthesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

M. A. Gerritzen ,
M. Kluivers-Poodt ,
H. G. M. Reimert ,
V. Hindle  and
E. Lambooij
M. A. Gerritzen*
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Animal Sciences Group, P.O. Box 65, 8200, AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
M. Kluivers-Poodt
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Animal Sciences Group, P.O. Box 65, 8200, AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
H. G. M. Reimert
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Animal Sciences Group, P.O. Box 65, 8200, AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
V. Hindle
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Animal Sciences Group, P.O. Box 65, 8200, AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
E. Lambooij
Affiliation:
Wageningen University and Research Centre, Animal Sciences Group, P.O. Box 65, 8200, AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
*
E-mail: marien.gerritzen@wur.nl
Get access

Abstract

It has become common practice in pig fattening production systems to castrate young boar piglets without the use of anaesthesia. In this study, we examined whether or not CO2 gas is capable of inducing an acceptable anaesthetic state during which castration can be performed. The first step was to identify the most promising CO2/O2 mixture. Based on the results from this first experiment, a mixture of 70% CO2 + 30% O2 was chosen for further investigation as a potential anaesthetic during the castration of young piglets. Thereby, it was established whether the duration and depth of anaesthesia were acceptable for castration where the animal has to be insensible and unconscious. Physiological effects were assessed based on electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements, blood gas values and behavioural responses. During the induction phase, the only typical behaviour the piglets exhibited when exposed to the 70/30 gas mixture was heavy breathing. All piglets (n = 25) lost consciousness after approximately 30 s according to the EEG. Heart rate decreased slowly during the induction phase, a serious drop occurred when piglets lost their posture. Immediately after this drop, the heart rate neared zero or showed a very irregular pattern. Shortly after loss of posture, most animals showed a few convulsions. None of the animals showed any reaction to castration in behaviour and/or on the EEG and ECG. On average, the piglets recovered within 59 s, i.e. EEG returned to its pre-induction pattern and piglets were able to regain a standing position. After 120 s, heart rate returned to pre-induction levels. In order to explore the usage range of CO2 concentration, 24 piglets were exposed to 60% CO2 + 20% O2 + 20% N2 for up to 30 s after loss of consciousness (as registered on EEG), and castrated after removal from the chamber. Sixteen of the 24 animals showed a reaction to the castration on the EEG. To establish the maximum time piglets survive in 70% CO2 + 30% O2, five piglets were placed in this mixture for 3 min. Two of them died. After that, four piglets were placed in this mixture for 2 min after unconsciousness, one died after 2 min. It was concluded from this study that it is possible to anaesthetise piglets with a mixture of 70% CO2 + 30% O2, but that there are limits to its safety in terms of CO2 concentration and duration of exposure. Before implementation for practical use, further research is essential to assess the limits of gas concentration and exposure times.

Keywords

anaesthesiacarbon dioxidecastration piglets
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 11 , November 2008 , pp. 1666 - 1673
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AVMA Panel 2004. Report on the AVMA panel on euthanasia. www.avma.org/issues/animal_welfare/euthanasia.pdfGoogle Scholar
van den Bogaard, AJM, van Dam, E, Weekers, FH 1985. Het gebruik van een koolzuurgas euthenasie apparaat voor ratten. Biotechniek 3, 34–38.Google Scholar
Coenen, AML, Drinkenburg, WHIM, Hoenderken, R, van Luijtelaar, ELJM 1995. Carbon dioxide euthanasia in rats: oxygen supplementation minimizes signs of agitation and asphyxia. Laboratory Animals 29, 262–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danneman, PJ, Stein, S, Walshaw, SO 1997. Humane and practical implications of using carbon dioxide mixed with oxygen for anesthesia or euthanasia of rats. Laboratory Animal Sciences 47, 376–385.Google Scholar
Eger, EIN 1981. Isoflurane: a review. Anesthesiology 55, 559–576.Google Scholar
Eisele, JH, Eger, EI, Muallem, M 1967. Narcotic properties of carbon dioxide in the dog. Aneasthesiology 28, 856–865.Google Scholar
Forslid, A 1987. Transient neocortical, hippocampe and amygdaloid EEG silence induced by one minute inhalation of high concentrations CO2 in swine. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 130, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GenStat Committee 2000. The guide to GenStat (ed. RW Payne). VSN Int. Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
Gerritzen, MA, Lambooij, E, Reimert, HGM, Spruijt, BM, Stegeman, JA 2006. Susceptibility of ducks and turkey to severe hypercapnic hypoxia. Poultry Science 85, 1055–1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerritzen, M, Lambooij, B, Reimert, HGM, Stegeman, A, Spruijt, B 2007. A note on behaviour of poultry exposed to increasing carbon dioxide concentrations. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyton, AC, Hall, JE 2000. Chapters 5 and 7 in textbook of medical physiology, 10th edition. W.B. Saunders Co, Philadelphia, Phennsylvania, USA.Google Scholar
Hari, P, Portin, K, Kettenmann, B, Jousmäki, V, Kobal, G 1997. Right-hemisphere preponderance of responses to painful CO2 stimulation of the human nasal mucosa. Pain 72, 145–151.Google Scholar
Iwarsson, K, Rehbinder, C 1993. A study of different euthanasia techniques in guinea pigs, rats and mice. Animal response and post-mortem findings. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science 4, 191–205.Google Scholar
Jäggin, N, Kohler, I, Blum, U, Schatzmann, U 2001. Die kastration von neugeborenen ferkeln unter halothananästhesie. Der Praktische Tierarzt 82, 1054–1061.Google Scholar
Johnson, NL, Kotz, S 1969. Discrete distributions. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kohler, I, Moens, Y, Busato, A, Blum, J, Schatzman, U 1998. Inhalation anaesthesia for the castration of piglets: CO2 compared to halothane. Journal of Veterinary medicine 45, 625–633.Google Scholar
Kooi, AK, Tucker, PT, Marshall, RE 1978. Fundamentals of electroencephalography, 2nd edition. Harper & Row, Publishers, Maryland.Google Scholar
Lambooij E 1990. The use of CO2 for stunning of slaughter pigs. Report of a meeting of experts, Heeze, 26–27 January 1990 [Anwendung von CO2 zur Betäubung von Schlachtschweinen. Bericht über eine von 26. bis 27.1.1990 in Heeze abgehaltene Expertentagung]. IVO B-Rapport 354, 1990, Zeist. Fleischwirtschaft 70 1990 10, pp. 1161–1166. (Eng.: pp. 1173–1177).Google Scholar
Lambooij, E, Gerritzen, MA, Engel, B, Hillebrand, SJW, Lankhaar, J, Pieterse, C 1999. Behavioural responses during exposure of broilers to different gas mixtures. Applied Animal Behaviour science 62, 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauer S 1994. Die CO2/O2- Anästhesia zur routinemässigen kastration von Ferkeln. Beurteilung von praxiseignung und Tierschutzrelevanz anhand von Verhaltensbeobachtungen. Diss med vet München.Google Scholar
Leach, MC, Bowell, VA, Allan, TF, Morton, DB 2002. Aversion to gaseous euthanasia agents in rats and mice. Comparative Medicine 52, 249–257.Google ScholarPubMed
Martoft L 2001. Neurophysiological effects of high concentration CO2 inhalation in swine. PhD, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.Google Scholar
Martoft, L, Jørgenson, HS, Foslid, A, Pedersen, HD, Jørgenson, PF 2003. CO2 induced acute respiratory acidoses and brain tissue intracellular pH: a 31P NMR study in swine. Laboratory Animals 37, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattson, JL, Stinson, JM, Clark, CS 1972. Electroencephalographic power-spectral changes coincident with the onset of carbon dioxide narcosis in rhesus monkey. American Journal of Veterinary Research 33, 2043–2049.Google Scholar
McGlone, JJ, Hellman, JM 1988. Local and general anesthetic effects on behavior and performance of two and seven-week-old castrated and uncastrated piglets. Journal of Animal Science 66, 3049–3058.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, JJ, Nicholson, RI, Hellman, M, Herzog, DN 1993. The development of pain in young pigs associated with castration and attempts to prevent castration-induced behavioral changes. Journal Animal Science 71, 1441–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKeegan, DEF, Smith, FS 2005. Behavioural correlation of olfactory and trigeminal gaseous stimulation in chickens, Gallus domesticus. Physiology and Behaviour 84, 761–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molony, V, Kent, JE 1997. Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and hysiological measurements. Journal of Animal Science 75, 266–272.Google Scholar
Prunier, A, Mounier, AM, Hay, M 2005. Effects of castration, tooth resection, or tail dockuing on plasma metabolites and stress hormones in young pigs. Journal of. Animal Science 83, 216–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raj, ABM, Gregory, NG 1995. Welfare implications of the gas stunning of pigs 1. Determination of aversion to the initial inhalation of carbon dioxide or argon. Animal Welfare 4, 273–280.Google Scholar
Raj, ABM, Wotton, SB, Gregory, NG 1992. Changes in somatosensory evoked potentials and spontaneous electrocardiogram of hens during stunning with carbon dioxide and argon mixture. British Veterinary Journal 148, 147–156.Google Scholar
Svendsen, O 2006. Castration of piglets under carbon dioxide (CO2) anaesthesia. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 29, 47–59.Google Scholar
Taylor, AA, Weary, DM 2000. Vocal responses of piglets to castration: identifying procedural sources of pain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, AA, Weary, DM, Lessard, M, Braithwaite, LA 2001. Behavioural responses of piglets to castration: the effect of piglet age. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, B, Jäggin, N, Doherr, M, Schatsmann, U 2004. Inhalation anaesthesia for castration of newborn piglets: experiences with isoflurane and isoflurane/N2O. Journal of Veterinary Medicine 51, 150–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weary, DM, Braithwaite, LA, Fraser, D 1998. Vocal response to pain in piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wemelsfelder F and Putten G van 1985. Behavior as a possible indicator for pain in piglets. Zeist, The Netherlands, Instituut voor Veeteltkundig Onderzoek “Schoonoord”.Google Scholar
Woodburry, DM, Karler, R 1960. The role of carbon dioxide in the nervous system. Journal of American Society of Anaesthesiologists 21, 686–703.Google Scholar