Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:53:04.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of neural histomorphology in tail tips from pigs docked using clippers or cautery iron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

N. J. Kells ,
N. J. Beausoleil ,
C. B. Johnson ,
M. A. Sutherland ,
R. S. Morrison  and
W. Roe
N. J. Kells*
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
N. J. Beausoleil
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
C. B. Johnson
Affiliation:
Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
M. A. Sutherland
Affiliation:
AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton 3214, New Zealand
R. S. Morrison
Affiliation:
Rivalea Australia, Corowa, NSW 2646, Australia
W. Roe
Affiliation:
Pathobiology Department, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
†E-mail: N.J.Kells@massey.ac.nz
Get access

Abstract

Tail docking of pigs is commonly performed to reduce the incidence of unwanted tail-biting behaviour. Two docking methods are commonly used: blunt trauma cutting (i.e. using side clippers), or cutting and concurrent cauterisation using a hot cautery iron. A potential consequence of tail amputation is the development of neuromas at the docking site. Neuromas have been linked to neuropathic pain, which can influence the longer-term welfare of affected individuals. To determine whether method of tail docking influences the extent of neuroma formation, 75 pigs were allocated to one of three treatments at birth: tail docked using clippers; tail docked using cautery iron; tail left intact. Tail docking was performed at 2 days of age and pigs were kept under conventional conditions until slaughter at 21 weeks of age. Tails were removed following slaughter and subjected to histological examination. Nerve histomorphology was scored according to the following scale: 1=discrete well-organised nerve bundles; 2=moderate neural proliferation and disorganisation affecting more than half of the circumference of the tail; 3=marked neural proliferation to form almost continuous disorganised bundles or non-continuous enlarged bundles compressing the surrounding connective tissue. Scores of 2 or 3 indicated neuroma formation. Scores were higher in docked pigs than undocked pigs (P<0.001), but did not differ between pigs docked using clippers and those docked using cautery (P=0.23). The results indicate that tail docking using either clippers or cautery results in neuroma formation, thus having the potential to affect long-term pig welfare.

Keywords

neuromapainpigtail dockingwelfare
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 7 , July 2017 , pp. 1222 - 1227
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breward, J and Gentle, MJ 1985. Neuroma formation and abnormal afferent nerve discharges after partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in poultry. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 41, 1132–1134.Google Scholar
Costigan, M, Scholz, J and Woolf, CJ 2009. Neuropathic pain: a maladaptive response of the nervous system to damage. Annual Review of Neuroscience 32, 1–32.Google Scholar
Devor, M and Seltzer, Z 1999. Pathophysiology of damaged nerves in relation to chronic pain. In Textbook of pain (ed. PD Wall and R Melzack), pp. 129–144. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Done, S, Guise, J and Chennells, D 2003. Tail biting and tail docking in pigs. The Pig Journal 51, 136–154.Google Scholar
Dougherty, RW 1976. Problems associated with feeding farm livestock under intensive systems. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 25, 249–275.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) 2007. The risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems. EFSA Journal 611, 1–13.Google Scholar
Fisher, GT and Boswick, JA Jr 1983. Neuroma formation following digital amputations. The Journal of Trauma 23, 136–142.Google Scholar
Foltán, R, Klíma, K, Špačková, J and Šedý, J 2008. Mechanism of traumatic neuroma development. Medical Hypotheses 71, 572–576.Google Scholar
Gross, T and Carr, S 1990. Amputation neuroma of docked tails in dogs. Veterinary Pathology 27, 61–62.Google Scholar
French, N and Morgan, K 1992. Neuromata in docked lambs’ tails. Research in Veterinary Science 52, 389–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herskin, MS, Thodberg, K and Jensen, HE 2015. Effects of tail docking and docking length on neuroanatomical changes in healed tail tips of pigs. Animal 9, 677–681.Google Scholar
Hunter, E, Jones, T, Guise, H, Penny, R and Hoste, S 1999. Tail biting in pigs 1: the prevalence at six UK abattoirs and the relationship of tail biting with docking, sex and other carcass damage. The Pig Journal 43, 18–32.Google Scholar
Hunter, E, Jones, T, Guise, H, Penny, R and Hoste, S 2001. The relationship between tail biting in pigs, docking procedure and other management practices. Veterinary Journal 161, 72–79.Google Scholar
Kells, N, Beausoleil, N, Chambers, JP, Sutherland, MA, Morrison, R and Johnson, CB 2013. EEG assessment of acute pain in pigs during tail docking. Manipulating Pig Production, 24–27 November 2013, Melbourne, Australia, p. 129.Google Scholar
Lewin-Kowalik, J, Marcol, W, Kotulska, K, Mandera, M and Klimczak, A 2006. Prevention and management of painful neuroma. Neurologia Medico-Chirurfica (Tokyo) 46, 62–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morrison, RS, Kells, NJ, Johnson, CB and Hemsworth, PH 2013. Assessment of pain induced by tail docking in piglets and strategies to reduce this pain. Final Report, APL Project 2010/1018.348, Corowa, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
Nannoni, E, Valsami, T, Luca, S and Martelli, G 2014. Tail docking in pigs: a review on its short- and long-term consequences and effectiveness in preventing tail biting. Italian Journal of Animal Science 13, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, AB, Jensen, HE and Leifsson, PS 2011. Immunohistochemistry for 2′,3′-cyclic nucleotide-3′-phosphohydrolase in 63 bovine peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Veterinary Pathology 48, 796–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroder-Petersen, D and Simonsen, HB 2001. Tail biting in pigs. Veterinary Journal 162, 196–210.Google Scholar
Scollo, A, Contiero, B and Gottardo, F 2015. Frequency of tail lesions and risk factors for tail biting in heavy pig production from weaning to 170 kg live weight. Veterinary Journal 207, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonsen, HB, Klinken, L and Bindseil, E 1991. Histopathology of intact and docked pigtails. British Veterinary Journal 147, 407–412.Google Scholar
Sonoda, L, Fels, M, Oczak, M, Vranken, E, Ismayilova, G, Guarino, M, Viazzi, S, Bahr, C, Berckmans, D and Hartung, J 2012. Tail biting in pigs – causes and management intervention strategies to reduce the behavioural disorder. A review. Berliner Und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 126, 104–112.Google Scholar
Stafford, KJ 2010. Tail biting: an important and undesirable behaviour of growing pigs. Veterinary Journal 186, 131–132.Google Scholar
Sullivan, DJ 1985. Results of digital neurorrhaphy in adults. The Journal of Hand Surgery: British & European Volume 10, 41–44.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Bryer, PJ, Krebs, N and McGlone, JJ 2008. Tail docking in pigs: acute physiological and behavioural responses. Animal 2, 292–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutherland, MA, Bryer, PJ, Krebs, N and McGlone, JJ 2009. The effect of method of tail docking on tail-biting behaviour and welfare of pigs. Animal Welfare 18, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, MA and Tucker, CB 2011. The long and short of it: a review of tail docking in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 179–191.Google Scholar
Taylor, NR, Parker, RMA, Mendl, M, Edwards, SA and Main, DCJ 2012. Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies. Veterinary Journal 194, 77–83.Google Scholar
van der Avoort, DJJC, Hovius, SER, Selles, RW, van Neck, JW and Coert, JH 2013. The incidence of symptomatic neuroma in amputation and neurorrhaphy patients. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 66, 1330–1334.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M 2001. Pathobiology of neuropathic pain. European Journal of Pharmacology 429, 23–37.Google Scholar