Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:11:39.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digestibility of whole-crop barley and oat silages in dairy heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

J. Wallsten ,
J. Bertilsson ,
E. Nadeau  and
K. Martinsson
J. Wallsten*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden
J. Bertilsson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Kungsängen Research Centre, SE-753 23 Uppsala, Sweden
E. Nadeau
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Environment and Health, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 234, SE-532 23 Skara, Sweden
K. Martinsson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Research for Northern Sweden, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden
*
†E-mail: Johanna.Wallsten@njv.slu.se
Get access

Abstract

This study evaluated the digestibility of whole-crop cereal silage (WCCS) made from oats and six-rowed barley harvested at the heading, early milk and early dough stages, and two-rowed barley harvested at the early milk and early dough stages of maturity. The eight WCCSs were fed to 32 Swedish Red heifers in a changeover design over three periods of 28 days each. The heifers were first fed ad libitum for 17 days and then at 0.95 of ad libitum for 11 days of each period. During the last 5 days all faeces and orts were collected to determine the digestibility of the silages. Only the maturity stage effect was significant for the WCCS organic matter (OM) digestibility and the average OM digestibility was higher at the heading stage (698 g/kg) than at early milk (647 g/kg) and early dough (652 g/kg) stages of maturity. For neutral detergent fibre (NDF) digestibility the crop × maturity stage effect was significant. The NDF digestibility decreased from the heading to the early milk stage for both six-rowed barley (746 to 607 g/kg) and oats (698 to 596 g/kg). There was no further significant decrease in NDF digestibility for six-rowed barley at the early dough stage (577 g/kg), but for two-rowed barley it decreased from the early milk (682 g/kg) to the early dough (573 g/kg) stage, and also for oats the NDF digestibility was lowest at the early dough stage (507 g/kg). The decrease in NDF digestibility during maturation was to a large extent compensated by an increase in starch concentration in the crops. The starch digestibility was lower for six-rowed barley at early dough stage (948 g/kg) than at early milk stage (977 g/kg), and was also lower compared with oats (979 g/kg) at early dough stage. The average crude protein (CP) digestibility was higher at the heading (646 g/kg) and the early milk (642 g/kg) stages than at the early dough stage (599 g/kg), and oats had higher average CP digestibility (650 g/kg) than six-rowed (613 g/kg) and two-rowed (624 g/kg) barley. Delaying the harvest of WCCS from the heading to the early milk and dough stage of maturity will decrease the OM digestibility; as a result there is a decreased NDF digestibility.

Keywords

Avena sativa,Hordeum vulgare, whole-crop cereal silage, utilization, maturity
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , March 2010 , pp. 432 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, YM, Stallings, CC, Polan, CE, Miller, CN 1991. Evaluation of barley silage harvested at boot and soft dough stages. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, WG, Byrem, TM, Grant, AL 1991. Ensiling characteristics of whole-crop small grains harvested at milk and dough stages. Journal of Animal Science 69, 1766–1774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borowiec, F, Furgal, K, Kaminski, J, Zajac, T 1998. Nutritive value of silage made of whole barley crop harvested at various stages of maturity. Journal of Animal and Feed Science 7, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crovetto, GM, Galassi, G, Rapetti, L, Sandrucci, A, Tamburini, A 1998. Effect of maturity on the nutritive value of whole crop wheat silage. Livestock Production Science 55, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emile, JC, Jobim, CC, Suralt, F, Barrière, Y 2007. Genetic variations in the digestibility in sheep of selected whole-crop cereals used as silages. Animal 8, 1122–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, HK, Van Soest, PJ 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis, USDA, Agricultural Research Service Handbook, number 379.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, AH, Mehlqvist, M, Volden, H, Larsen, M, Gudmundsson, G 2005. NorFor: the new Nordic feed evaluation system. In Book of abstracts of the 56th annual meeting of the European association for animal production (ed. van der Honing Y, Strandberg E, Cenkvári E, von Borell E, Kemp B, Lazzaroni C, Gauly M, Wenk C, Martin-Rosset W, Bernués Jal A and Thomas C), no 11, p 56. Wagening Academic Publishers, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Jackson, MA, Readman, RJ, Huntington, JA, Sinclair, LA 2004. The effects of processing at harvest and cutting height of urea-treated whole-crop wheat on performance and digestibility in dairy cows. Animal Science 78, 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaster, EH, Murphy, MR 1983. Effects of varying particle size of forage on digestion and chewing behaviour of dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 802–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khorasani, GR, Jedel, PE, Helm, JH, Kennelly, JJ 1997. Influence of stage of maturity on yield components and chemical composition of cereal grain silages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litell, RC, Milliken, GA, Stroup, WW, Wolfinger, RD 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS institute Inc, Cary, USA.Google Scholar
McCartney, DH, Vaage, AS 1994. Comparative yield and feeding value of barley, oat and triticale silages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 74, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustafa, AF, Seguin, P 2003. Effects of stage of maturity on ensiling characteristics and ruminal nutrient degradability of oat silage. Archives of Animal Nutrition 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadeau, E 2007. Effects of plant species, stage of maturity and additive on the feeding value of whole-crop cereal silage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 87, 789–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, JB, Van Soest, PJ 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In The analysis of dietary fibres in foods (ed. WPT James and O Theander). Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Soita, HW, Christensen, DA, McKinnon, JJ, Mustafa, AF 2002. Effects of barley silage of different theoretical cut length on digestion kinetics in ruminants. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spörndly, R 2003. Fodertabeller för idisslare (In Swedish). The Department of Animal Nutrition and Management Report 257. The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Südekum, K-H, Röh, H, Brandt, M, Rave, G, Stangassinger, M 1995. Comparative digestion in cattle and sheep fed wheat silage at low and high intakes. Journal of Dairy Sciences 78, 1498–1511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tottman, DR 1987. The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Annals of Applied Biology 110, 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ 1994. Carbohydrates. In Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd edition. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallsten, J, Martinsson, K 2009. Effects of maturity stage and feeding strategy of whole crop barley silage on intake, digestibility and milk production in dairy cows. Livestock Science 121, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallsten, J, Nadeau, E, Bertilsson, J, Martinsson, K 2009. Voluntary intake and diet selection by dairy heifers fed ensiled whole-crop barley and oats harvested at different stages of maturity. Livestock Science 122, 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, JC, Chang, TT, Konzak, CF 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar