Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:37:46.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of calf jacket usage on performance, behaviour and physiological responses of group-housed dairy calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2019

G. Scoley Open the ORCID record for G. Scoley [Opens in a new window] ,
A. Gordon  and
S. J. Morrison
G. Scoley*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
A. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, Northern Ireland
S. J. Morrison
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland
*
†E-mail: Gillian. Scoley@afbini.gov.uk
Get access

Abstract

Poor performance and ill-health of calves in the pre-wean period can affect future productivity. Increasing numbers of producers are opting to use calf jackets as a means of mitigating the potential negative effects of low ambient temperatures, wind speed and precipitation on growth and health. This study aimed to use a range of noninvasive monitoring technologies to investigate the effects of using calf jackets in the first 3 weeks of life on calf performance and behavioural and physiological parameters. Ninety Holstein-Friesian calves were allocated to one of the two treatments: (i) Jacketed until 21 days of age and (J; n = 44) ii. Nonjacketed (NJ; n = 46). Calves were group housed and fed milk replacer (MR) and concentrate solid feed via automatic feeders. Calves were weaned at day 56, and the experiment was completed at day 63. Health assessments were conducted on a daily basis throughout the experiment using predefined faecal and respiratory scoring protocols. A range of novel, noninvasive monitoring technologies were used to examine the activity, heart rate and thermal profiles of calves on an individual basis throughout the experimental period. There were no differences in calf live weight (LWT), average daily gain (ADG) or feed conversion efficiency (FCE) in J and NJ calves between days 5 to 20. However, NJ calves consumed more MR and had more unrewarded visits to the milk feeder than J calves during this period. Although calf LWT was comparable across treatments in the week following jacket removal (days 21 to 28), both ADG and FCE tended to be greater in NJ calves. There were no treatment differences in calf LWT at the end of the study (d63). When measured over a period of 24 h and at a mean ambient temperature of 7.7°C, skin surface temperature was 6.37°C higher in J calves. Core body temperature was higher in J calves between days 5 to 20; however, there were no differences in IR eye or IR rectal temperature. No differences in lying behaviour occurred, with calves spending 18 and 17 h/day lying between days 5 to 20 and days 21 to 28, respectively. Under the climatic and management conditions described, no significant benefits to calf performance were found as a result of the provision of calf jackets to group-housed calves in the first 3 weeks of life. The higher frequency of unrewarded visits to the milk feeder in NJ calves during the first 3 weeks of life could be suggestive of a lack of satiety in these calves.

Keywords

early calfhoodlower critical temperaturethermoregulationmonitoring technologiesthermo neutral zone
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 12 , December 2019 , pp. 2876 - 2884
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Byrne, CJ, Fair, S, English, AM, Johnston, D, Lonergan, P and Kenny, DA 2017. Effect of milk replacer and concentrate intake on growth rate, feeding behaviour and systemic metabolite concentrations of pre-weaned bull calves of two dairy breeds. Animal 11, 1531–1538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carstens, G 1994. Cold thermoregulation in the newborn calf. Veterinary clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 10, 69–106.Google ScholarPubMed
Clapp, JB, Croarkin, S, Dolphin, C and Lyons, SK 2014. Heart rate variability: a biomarker of dairy calf welfare. Animal Production Science 55, 1289–1294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockram, MS and Rowan, TG 1989. Effect of air temperature on the abomasal and small intestinal digestion of a milk substitute diet given to young calves. Animal Production 48, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushnahan, A and Gordon, FJ 1995. The effects of grass preservation on intake, apparent digestibility and rumen degradation characteristics. Animal Science 60, 429–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earley, B, Murray, M, Farrell, JA and Nolan, M 2004. Rearing calves outdoors with and without calf jackets compared with indoor housing on calf health and live-weight performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 43, 59–67.Google Scholar
Finney, G, Gordon, A, Scoley, G and Morrison, SJ 2018. Validating the IceRobotics IceQube tri-axial accelerometer for measuring daily lying duration in dairy calves. Livestock Science 214, 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Jimenez, E and Blaxter, KL 1962. The metabolism and thermal regulation of calves in the first month of life. The British Journal of Nutrition 16, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hänninen, L 2003. Resting behaviour, growth and diarrhoea incidence rate of young dairy calves housed individually or in groups in warm or cold buildings. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica: Section A, Animal Science 53, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepola, H, Hänninen, L,Pursiainen, P, Tuure, VM, Syrjälä-Qvist, L, Pyykkönen, M and Saloniemi, H 2006. Feed intake and oral behaviour of dairy calves housed individually or in groups in warm or cold buildings. Livestock Science 105, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, TM, Bateman, HG, Aldrich, JM, Quigley, JD and Schlotterbeck, RL 2013. Short communication: intensive measurements of standing time of dairy calves housed in individual pens within a naturally ventilated, unheated nursery over different periods of the year. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 1811–1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUPS Thermal Commission 2001. Glossary of terms for thermal physiology. The Japanese Journal of Physiology 51, 245–280.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, T, Sütterlin, S, Schulz, SM and Vögele, C 2011. ARTiiFACT: a tool for heart rate artifact processing and heart rate variability analysis. Behavior Research Methods 43, 1161–1170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuirk, SM and Peek, SF 2014. Timely diagnosis of dairy calf respiratory disease using a standardized scoring system. Animal Health Research Reviews 15, 145–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nonnecke, BJ, Foote, MR, Miller, BL, Fowler, M, Johnson, TE and Horst, RL 2009. Effects of chronic environmental cold on growth, health, and select metabolic and immunologic responses of preruminant calves1. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 6134–6143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, DP, Papasian, CJ and Ritter, RC 1980a. The effects of cold stress on neonatal calves II. absorption of colostral immunoglobulins. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 44, 19–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Olson, DP, Papasian, CJ and Ritter, RC 1980b. The effects of cold stress on neonatal calves. I. Clinical condition and pathological lesions. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 44, 11–18.Google Scholar
Piccione, G, Caola, G and Refinetti, R 2003. Daily and estrous rhythmicity of body temperature in domestic cattle. BMC Physiology 3, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quigley, JD, Wolfe, TA and Elsasser, TH 2006. Effects of additional milk replacer feeding on calf health, growth, and selected blood metabolites in calves. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawson, RE, Dziuk, HE, Good, AL,Anderson, JF, Bates, DW and Ruth, GR 1989a. Thermal insulation of young calves exposed to cold. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 53, 275–278.Google Scholar
Rawson, RE, Dziuk, HE, Good, AL, Anderson, JF, Bates, DW, Ruth, GR and Serfass, RC 1989b. Health and metabolic responses of young calves housed at -30 degrees C to -8 degrees C. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 53, 268–274.Google ScholarPubMed
Roland, L, Drillich, M, Klein-Jobstl, D and Iwersen, M 2016. Invited review: influence of climatic conditions on the development, performance, and health of calves. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 2438–2452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J, Chapinal, N and de Passille, AM 2012. Automated monitoring of behavioural-based animal welfare indicators. Animal Welfare 21, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrama, JW, Arieli, A, Brandsma, HA, Luiting, P and Verstegen, MWA 1993. Thermal requirements of young calves during standing and lying. Journal of Animal Science 71, 3285–3292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scibilia, LS, Muller, LD, Kensinger, RS, Sweeney, TF and Shellenberger, PR 1987. Effect of environmental-temperature and dietary-fat on growth and physiological-responses of newborn calves. Journal of Dairy Science 70, 1426–1433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scoley, GE, Gordon, AW and Morrison, SJ 2018. Use of thermal imaging in dairy calves: exploring the repeatability and accuracy of measures taken from different anatomical regions. Translational Animal Science 3, 564–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, M, Stookey, JM, Stafford, KJ, Tucker, CB, Rogers, AR, Dowling, SK, Verkerk, GA, Schaefer, AL and Webster, JR 2009. Effects of local anesthetic and a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug on pain responses of dairy calves to hot-iron dehorning. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 1512–1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Stewart, M and Schütz, KE 2013. Effects of two substrate types on the behaviour, cleanliness and thermoregulation of dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147, 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theurer, ME, Amrine, DE and White, BJ 2013. Remote noninvasive assessment of pain and health status in cattle. Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice 29, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, AJF, Gordon, JG and McGregor, R 1978. Cold tolerance of beef and dairy type calves in 1st weeks of life. Animal Production 26, 85–92.Google Scholar
Young, BA 1981. Cold stress as it affects animal production. Journal of Animal Science 52, 154–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Scoley et al. supplementary material

Scoley et al. supplementary material 1

Download Scoley et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17.8 KB