Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:58:04.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of early feed restriction on physiological responses, performance and ascites incidence in broiler chickens raised in normal or cold environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2016

R. Mohammadalipour*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
H. R. Rahmani
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
R. Jahanian
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
A. Riasi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
M. Mohammadalipour
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
N. Nili
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
Get access

Abstract

Intensive selection of broilers for faster growth and better feed efficiency resulted in greater susceptibility to metabolic disorders such as ascites syndrome, which is one of the major causes of mortality and economic loss in broiler industry. Whereas cool temperature is one of the primary triggers for ascites, early feed restriction (FDR) significantly alleviates its incidence and mortality. However, little is known about effects of FDR, cold environmental temperature and their interaction on physiological responses in broiler chickens. For this purpose, 320 one-day-old male broilers were divided into two treatment groups of Ad libitum (Ad) and feed restricted (FR) with eight pen replicates each. Chickens in FR group underwent feed access limitation from days 7 to 14 of age. On day 21 half of the birds (four pens) in each group exposed to the cold temperature (CT) and the other half (four pens) continued at normal temperature (NT). Average daily feed intake, average daily weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were measured at days 7, 14, 21, 28 and 42. At 39 and 46 days of age two chicks with a BW around the pen average were selected from each pen and slaughtered after collecting blood samples. Then, relative weight of internal organs and right ventricle weight per total ventricle weight (RV : TV) ratio were calculated. Compared with NT group, CT birds had higher daily feed intake and FCR (P<0.05) from day 28 to 42. Cumulative ascites mortality in CT chickens was higher (P<0.001) than NT chicks. Within the CT group, ascites mortality in FR chickens was reduced (P<0.001) to 1.25% compared with 8.75% in Ad chicks. Birds in CT group had significantly (P<0.05) thicker right ventricle and greater relative weight of heart, hematocrit and triiodothyronine concentration. However, none of these parameters were affected by FDR. Under cold stress conditions, FDR reduced activity of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase (P<0.05). Serum triglyceride, cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein and total protein were not influenced by either temperature or feeding regimen. In conclusion, these findings suggest that FDR reduces ascites incidence mainly by allowing better development of internal organs, which helps them to cope with the high metabolic pressure and suffer less damage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aftab, U and Khan, AA 2005. Strategies to alleviate the incidence of ascites in broilers: a review. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 7, 199204.Google Scholar
Arce, J, Berger, M and Lopez Coello, C 1992. Control of ascites syndrome by feed restriction techniques. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 1, 15.Google Scholar
Baghbanzadeh, A and Decuypere, E 2008. Ascites syndrome in broilers: physiological and nutritional perspectives. Avian Pathology 37, 117126.Google Scholar
Balog, JM, Anthony, NB, Cooper, MA, Kidd, BD, Huff, GR, Huff, WE and Rath, NC 2000. Ascites syndrome and related pathologies in feed restricted broilers raised in a hypobaric chamber. Poultry Science 79, 318323.Google Scholar
Butzen, FM, Ribeiro, AML, Vieira, MM, Kessler, AM, Dadalt, JC and Della, MP 2013. Early feed restriction in broilers. I–Performance, body fraction weights, and meat quality. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22, 251259.Google Scholar
Daneshyar, M, Kermanshahi, H and Golian, A 2009. Changes of biochemical parameters and enzyme activities in broiler chickens with cold-induced ascites. Poultry Science 88, 106110.Google Scholar
Fontana, EA, Weaver, WD Jr, Watkins, BA and Denbow, DM 1992. Effect of early feed restriction on growth, feed conversion, and mortality in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 71, 12961305.Google Scholar
Harr, KE 2002. Clinical chemistry of companion avian species: a review. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 31, 140151.Google Scholar
Ipek, A and Sahan, U 2006. Effects of cold stress on broiler performance and ascites susceptibility. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 19, 734738.Google Scholar
Julian, RJ 2000. Physiological, management and environmental triggers of the ascites syndrome: a review. Avian Pathology 29, 519527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Julian, RJ 2007. The response of the heart and pulmonary arteries to hypoxia, pressure, and volume: a short review. Poultry Science 86, 10061011.Google Scholar
Julian, RJ, McMillan, I and Quinton, N 1989. The effect of cold and dietary energy on right ventricular hypertrophy, right ventricular failure and ascites in broiler chickens. Avian Pathology 18, 675684.Google Scholar
Khajali, F and Qujeq, D 2005. Relationship between growth and serum lactate dehydrogenase activity and the development of ascites in broilers subjected to skip-a-day feed restriction. International Journal of Poultry Science 4, 317319.Google Scholar
Khajali, F, Zamani-Moghaddam, A and Asadi-Khoshoei, E 2007. Application of an early skip-a-day feed restriction on physiological parameters, carcass traits and development of ascites in male broilers reared under regular or cold temperatures at high altitude. Animal Science Journal 78, 159163.Google Scholar
Luger, D, Shinder, D, Rzepakovsky, V, Rusal, M and Yahav, S 2001. Association between weight gain, blood parameters, and thyroid hormones and the development of ascites syndrome in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 80, 965971.Google Scholar
Luger, D, Shinder, D, Wolfenson, D and Yahav, S 2003. Erythropoiesis regulation during the development of ascites syndrome in broiler chickens: a possible role of corticosterone. Journal of Animal Science 81, 784790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGovern, RH, Feddes, JJR, Robinson, FE and Hanson, JA 1999. Growth performance, carcass characteristics, and the incidence of ascites in broilers in response to feed restriction and litter oiling. Poultry Science 78, 522528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMurtry, JP, Plavnik, I, Rosebrough, RW, Steele, NC and Proudman, JA 1988. Effect of early feed restriction in male broiler chicks on plasma metabolic hormones during feed restriction and accelerated growth. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 91A, 6770.Google Scholar
McNabb, FMA 2000. Thyroids. In Sturkie’s avian physiology (ed. GC Whittow), 5th edition, pp. 461471. Academic Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
McNichols, MJ and McNabb, FMA 1987. Comparative thyroid function in adult Japanese quail and ring doves: influence of dietary iodine availability. Journal of Experimental Zoology 244, 263268.Google Scholar
National Research Council 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry, 9th revised edition. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Ozkan, S, Plavnik, I and Yahav, S 2006. Effects of early feed restriction on performance and ascites development in broiler chickens subsequently raised at low ambient temperature. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 15, 919.Google Scholar
Ozkan, S, Takma, Ç, Yahav, S, Söğüt, B, Türkmut, L, Erturun, H and Cahaner, A 2010. The effects of feed restriction and ambient temperature on growth and ascites mortality of broilers reared at high altitude. Poultry Science 89, 974985.Google Scholar
Pratt, DS and Kaplan, MM 2000. Evaluation of abnormal liver-enzyme results in asymptomatic patients. New England Journal of Medicine 342, 12661271.Google Scholar
Rajman, M, Juráni, M, Lamošová, D, Máčajová, M, Sedlačková, M, Košťál, L, Ježová, D and Výboh, P 2006. The effects of feed restriction on plasma biochemistry in growing meat type chickens (Gallus gallus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 145A, 363371.Google Scholar
Rudas, P and Pethes, G 1984. The importance of the peripheral thyroid hormone deiodination in adaptation to ambient temperature in the chicken (Gallus domesticus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 77A, 567571.Google Scholar
Wideman, RF 2001. Pathophysiology of heart/lung disorders: pulmonary hypertension syndrome in broiler chickens. World’s Poultry Science 57, 289307.Google Scholar
Wideman, RF, Rhoads, DD, Erf, GF and Anthony, NB 2013. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (ascites syndrome) in broilers: a review. Poultry Science 92, 6483.Google Scholar
Yahav, S, Straschnow, A, Plavnik, I and Hurwitz, S 1996. Effects of diurnally cycling versus constant temperatures on chickens growth and food intake. British Poultry Science 37, 4354.Google Scholar
Yahav, S, Straschnow, A, Plavnik, I and Hurwitz, S 1997. Blood system response of chickens to changes in environmental temperature. Poultry Science 76, 627633.Google Scholar
Zhan, XA, Wang, M, Ren, H, Zhao, RQ, Li, JX and Tan, ZL 2007. Effect of early feed restriction on metabolic programming and compensatory growth in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 86, 654660.Google Scholar