Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:58:05.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of grain and forage fractions of corn silage on milk production and composition in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2012

M. Boivin ,
R. Gervais  and
P. Y. Chouinard
M. Boivin
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l'Agriculture, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada
R. Gervais
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l'Agriculture, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada
P. Y. Chouinard*
Affiliation:
Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, 2425 rue de l'Agriculture, Québec, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada
*
†E-mail: yvan.chouinard@fsaa.ulaval.ca
Get access

Abstract

Corn silage (CS) is associated with a reduction in milk fat content. The fact that CS is constituted of a grain and a forage fraction could explain this effect. This experiment evaluated the effect of grain fraction of CS on rumen fermentation, production performance and milk composition. Earless CS (ECS) was harvested after manually removing corn ears from the plant. Whole CS (WCS) was harvested from the same field on the same day. Eight (four ruminally fistulated) multiparous Holstein cows (84 days in milk) were utilized in a double 4 × 4 Latin square with 21-day periods. Treatments were (dry matter (DM) basis) (1) 23.0% WCS; (2) 12.4% ECS plus 10.6% high moisture corn (HMC) to obtain reconstituted CS (RCS); (3) 23.0% ECS; and (4) 23.0% timothy silage (TS). Diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous and were fed as total mixed ration once a day. DM intake (DMI), milk yield, 4.0% fat-corrected milk (FCM), as well as protein concentration and yield were higher for WCS than ECS. Compared with WCS, cows tended to eat less with RCS, and produced less milk and milk protein. However, yield of FCM was similar between WCS and RCS. Milk fat concentration and yield, as well as the specific ratio of t11 18:1 to t10 18:1 in milk fat did not differ among diets. Milk urea-N tended to be higher for ECS than WCS and TS, whereas ruminal NH3-N was higher with ECS than TS. Rumen pH decreased linearly with time after feeding but was not different between treatments. Higher acetate and lower propionate concentration resulted in greater acetate to propionate ratio with ECS compared with WCS. In conclusion, removing grain fraction from CS decreased milk production and modified rumen fermentation without affecting milk fat concentration and yield. Moreover, despite some differences in DMI and total ruminal volatile fatty acid concentration between WCS and RCS, the restoration of FCM yield, using HMC in RCS diets, to a level of production similar to WCS highlights the importance of energy and nutrients supplied by the grain fraction of CS to support milk yield.

Keywords

corn silagecorn stalklageforage-to-concentrate ratio
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , February 2013 , pp. 245 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batajoo, KK, Shaver, RD 1994. Impact of nonfiber carbohydrate on intake, digestion, and milk production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 1580–1588.Google Scholar
Bauman, DE, Griinari, JM 2001. Regulation and nutritional manipulation of milk fat: low-fat milk syndrome. Livestock Production Science 70, 15–29.Google Scholar
Brito, AF, Broderick, GA 2006. Effect of varying dietary ratios of alfalfa silage to corn silage on production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3924–3938.Google Scholar
Broderick, GA 1985. Alfalfa silage or hay versus corn silage as the sole forage for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68, 3262–3271.Google Scholar
Canadian Council on Animal Care 1993. Guidelines to the care and use of experimental animals, vol. 1, 2nd edition. CCAC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Chouinard, PY, Lévesque, J, Girard, V, Brisson, GJ 1997. Dietary soybeans extruded at different temperatures: milk composition and in situ fatty acid reactions. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2913–2924.Google Scholar
Clark, PW, Armentano, LE 1999. Influence of particle size on the effectiveness of the fiber in corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 581–588.Google Scholar
Daynard, TB, Hunter, RB 1975. Relationship among whole-plant moisture, grain moisture, dry matter yield, and quality of whole-plant corn silage. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 77–84.Google Scholar
De Boever, JL, De Brabander, DL, De Smet, AM, Vanacker, JM, Boucque, CV 1993. Evaluation of physical structure. 2. Maize silage. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 1624–1634.Google Scholar
Dhiman, TR, Satter, LD 1997. Yield response of dairy cows fed different proportions of alfalfa silage and corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 2069–2082.Google Scholar
Emery, RS 1978. Feeding for increased milk protein. Journal of Dairy Science 61, 825–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, RJ, Colenbrander, VF, Mertens, DR 1990. Milk fat depression in dairy cows: role of silage particle size. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 1834–1842.Google Scholar
Griinari, JM, Dwyer, DA, McGuire, MA, Bauman, DE, Palmquist, DL, Nurmela, KVV 1998. Trans-octadecenoic acids and milk fat depression in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1251–1261.Google Scholar
Kramer, JKG, Hernandez, M, Cruz-Hernandez, C, Kraft, J, Dugan, MER 2008. Combining results of two GC separations partly achieves determination of all cis and trans 16:1, 18:1, 18:2 and 18:3 except CLA isomers of milk fat as demonstrated using Ag-ion SPE fractionation. Lipids 43, 259–273.Google Scholar
Lechartier, C, Peyraud, JL 2010. The effects of forage proportion and rapidly degradable dry matter from concentrate on ruminal digestion in dairy cows fed corn silage-based diets with fixed neutral detergent fiber and starch contents. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 666–681.Google Scholar
Lobley, GE, Connell, A, Lomax, MA, Brown, DS, Milne, E, Calder, AG, Farningham, DAH 1995. Hepatic detoxification of ammonia in ovine liver: possible consequences for amino acid catabolism. British Journal of Nutrition 73, 667–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macleod, GK, Grieve, DG, McMillan, I 1983. Performance of first lactation dairy cows fed complete rations of several ratios of forage to concentrate. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 1668–1674.Google Scholar
Mader, TL, Britton, RA 1986. Utilization of alfalfa hay and alfalfa silage. 2. Protein sources in ensiled corn stover diets. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 2342–2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maekawa, M, Beauchemin, KA, Christensen, DA 2002. Effect of concentrate level and feeding management on chewing activities, saliva production, and ruminal pH of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1165–1175.Google Scholar
Mertens, DR 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1463–1481.Google Scholar
Morrison, FB, Humphrey, GC, Hulce, RS 1921. Corn stover silage versus corn silage for milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 4, 29–31.Google Scholar
Novozamsky, I, van Eck, R, van Schouwenburg, JC, Walinga, I 1974. Total nitrogen determination in plant material by means of the indophenol-blue method. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 22, 3–5.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th revised edition. NRC, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Oba, M, Allen, MS 2003. Effects of corn grain conservation method on feeding behavior and productivity of lactating dairy cows at two dietary starch concentrations. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 174–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onetti, SG, Reynal, SM, Grummer, RR 2004. Effect of alfalfa forage preservation method and particle length on performance of dairy cows fed corn silage-based diets and tallow. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 652–664.Google Scholar
Onetti, SG, Shaver, RD, McGuire, MA, Palmquist, DL, Grummer, RR 2002. Effect of supplemental tallow on performance of dairy cows fed diets with different corn silage:alfalfa silage ratios. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 632–641.Google Scholar
Rahman, AU, Khan, A, Amjed, M, Ahmad, N 2003. Effect of substitution of whole crop versus maize stover silages with commercial concentrates on milk yield and its composition in Sahiwal cows. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 23, 150–152.Google Scholar
Ruppert, LD, Drackley, JK, Bremmer, DR, Clark, JH 2003. Effects of tallow in diets based on corn silage or alfalfa silage on digestion and nutrient use by lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 593–609.Google Scholar
Staples, CR, Cullens, FM 2005. Implications of fat-feeding practices for lactating dairy cows – effects on milk fat. In Advances in dairy technology (ed. KA Beauchemin), pp. 277–295. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.Google Scholar
Sukhija, PS, Palmquist, DL 1988. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 36, 1202–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, JD 1989. Altering milk composition by feeding. Journal of Dairy Science 72, 2801–2814.Google Scholar
Szasz, JI, Hunt, CW, Szasz, PA, Weber, RA, Owens, FN, Kezar, W, Turgeon, OA 2007. Influence of endosperm vitreousness and kernel moisture at harvest on site and extent of digestion of high-moisture corn by feedlot steers. Journal of Animal Science 85, 2214–2221.Google Scholar
Valadares Filho, SC, Broderick, GA, Valadares, RFD, Clayton, MK 2000. Effect of replacing alfalfa silage with high moisture corn on nutrient utilization and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 106–114.Google Scholar
Vlaeminck, B, Fievez, V, Cabrita, ARJ, Fonseca, AJM, Dewhurst, RJ 2006. Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: a review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131, 389–417.Google Scholar
Weiss, WP, St-Pierre, NR, Willett, LB 2009. Varying type of forage, concentration of metabolizable protein, and source of carbohydrate affects nutrient digestibility and production by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 5595–5606.Google Scholar